Prevalence and correlates of silent cerebral infarcts in the Framingham offspring study.

Department of Neurology, Boston University, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Stroke (Impact Factor: 6.02). 06/2008; 39(11):2929-35. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.516575
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Previous estimates of the prevalence of silent cerebral infarction (SCI) on MRI in community-based samples have varied between 5.8% and 17.7% depending on age, ethnicity, presence of comorbidities, and imaging techniques. We document the prevalence and risk factors associated with SCI at midlife in the community-based Framingham sample.
Our study sample comprised 2040 Framingham Offspring (53% female; mean age, 62+/-9 years) who attended the sixth examination (1996-1998), underwent volumetric brain MRI (1999-2005,) and were free of clinical stroke at MRI. We examined the age- and sex-specific prevalences and the clinical correlates of SCI using multivariable logistic regression models.
At least 1 SCI was present in 10.7% of participants; 84% had a single lesion. SCI was largely located in the basal ganglia (52%), other subcortical (35%) areas, and cortical areas (11%). Prevalent SCI was associated with the Framingham Stroke Risk Profile score (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.10-1.46); stage I hypertension was determined by JNC-7 criteria (OR,1.56; CI,1.15-2.11), an elevated plasma homocysteine in the highest quartile (OR, 2.23; CI, 1.42-3.51), atrial fibrillation (OR, 2.16; CI, 1.07-4.40), carotid stenosis >25% (OR, 1.62; 1.13-2.34), and increased carotid intimal-medial thickness above the lowest quintile (OR, 1.65; CI, 1.22-2.24).
The prevalence and distribution of SCI in the Framingham Offspring are comparable to previous estimates. Risk factors previously associated with clinical stroke were also found to be associated with midlife SCI. Our results support current guidelines emphasizing early detection and treatment of stroke risk factors.

  • Stroke 10/2014; 45(11). · 6.02 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients have a wide spectrum of risks for subsequent cardiovascular events and death. However, there is no simple, convenience scoring system to identify risk of adverse outcomes. We investigated whether CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores were useful tools to assess the risk for adverse events among ACS patients.
    PLoS ONE 10/2014; 9(10):e111167. · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: During the course of normal aging, biological changes occur in the brain that are associated with changes in cognitive ability. This review presents data from neuroimaging studies of primarily "normal" or healthy brain aging. As such, we focus on research in unimpaired or nondemented older adults, but also include findings from lifespan studies that include younger and middle aged individuals as well as from populations with prodromal or clinically symptomatic disease such as cerebrovascular or Alzheimer's disease. This review predominantly addresses structural MRI biomarkers, such as volumetric or thickness measures from anatomical images, and measures of white matter injury and integrity respectively from FLAIR or DTI, and includes complementary data from PET and cognitive or clinical testing as appropriate. The findings reveal highly consistent age-related differences in brain structure, particularly frontal lobe and medial temporal regions that are also accompanied by age-related differences in frontal and medial temporal lobe mediated cognitive abilities. Newer findings also suggest that degeneration of specific white matter tracts such as those passing through the genu and splenium of the corpus callosum may also be related to age-related differences in cognitive performance. Interpretation of these findings, however, must be tempered by the fact that comorbid diseases such as cerebrovascular and Alzheimer's disease also increase in prevalence with advancing age. As such, this review discusses challenges related to interpretation of current theories of cognitive aging in light of the common occurrence of these later-life diseases. Understanding the differences between "Normal" and "Healthy" brain aging and identifying potential modifiable risk factors for brain aging is critical to inform potential treatments to stall or reverse the effects of brain aging and possibly extend cognitive health for our aging society.
    Neuropsychology Review 08/2014; 24(3). · 5.40 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 16, 2014