Article

Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria in adults: evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force reaffirmation recommendation statement.

Center for Primary Care, Prevention, and Clinical Partnerships, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA.
Annals of internal medicine (Impact Factor: 16.1). 07/2008; 149(1):W20-4. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-1-200807010-00009-w1
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Asymptomatic bacteriuria is common, and screening for this condition in pregnant women is a well-established, evidence-based standard of current medical practice. Screening other groups of adults has not been shown to improve outcomes.
To review new and substantial evidence on screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria, to support the work of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
English-language studies of adults (age >18 years) indexed in PubMed and the Cochrane Library and published from 1 January 2002 through 30 April 2007.
For benefits of screening or treatment for screened populations, systematic reviews; meta-analyses; and randomized, controlled trials were included. For harms of screening, systematic reviews; meta-analyses; randomized, controlled trials; cohort studies; case-control studies; and case series of large multisite databases were included. Two reviewers independently reviewed titles, abstracts, and full articles for inclusion.
Two reviewers extracted data from studies on benefits of screening and treatment (including decreases in the incidence of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes, symptomatic urinary tract infections, hypertension, and renal function decline).
An updated Cochrane systematic review of 14 randomized, controlled trials of treatment supports screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women. A randomized, controlled trial and a prospective cohort study show that screening nonpregnant women with diabetes for asymptomatic bacteriuria is unlikely to produce benefits. No new evidence on screening men for asymptomatic bacteriuria or on harms of screening was found.
The focused search strategy may have missed some smaller studies on the benefits and harms of screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria.
The available evidence continues to support screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women, but not in other groups of adults.

1 Follower
 · 
105 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bacteriuria, or the presence of bacteria in urine, is associated with both asymptomatic, as well as symptomatic urinary tract infection and underpins much of the dynamic of microbial colonization of the urinary tract. The prevalence of bacteriuria in dissimilar patient groups such as healthy adults, institutionalized elderly, pregnant women, and immune-compromised patients varies widely. In addition, assessing the importance of 'significant bacteriuria' in infected individuals represents a diagnostic challenge, partly due to various causal microbes, and requires careful consideration of the distinct etiologies of bacteriuria in different populations and circumstances. Recent molecular discoveries have revealed how some bacterial traits can enable organisms to grow in human urine, which, as a fitness adaptation, is likely to influence the progression of bacteriuria in some individuals. In this review, we comprehensively analyze currently available data on the prevalence of causal organisms with a focus on asymptomatic bacteriuria in dissimilar populations. We evaluate recent advances in the molecular detection of bacteriuria from a diagnostic viewpoint, and briefly discuss the potential benefits and some of the challenges of these approaches. Overall, this review provides an update on the comparative prevalence and etiology of bacteriuria from both microbiological and clinical perspectives. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    FEMS Microbiology Letters 06/2013; 346(1). DOI:10.1111/1574-6968.12204 · 2.72 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Urinary tract infection (UTI) encompasses a variety of clinical syndromes ranging from mild to life-threatening conditions. As such, it represents an interesting model for the development of an analytically based scoring system of disease severity and/or host response. Here we test the feasibility of this concept using 1H NMR based metabolomics as the analytical platform. Using an exhaustively clinically characterized cohort and taking advantage of the multi-level study design, which opens possibilities for case–control and longitudinal modeling, we were able to identify molecular discriminators that characterize UTI patients. Among those discriminators a number (e.g. acetate, trimethylamine and others) showed association with the degree of bacterial contamination of urine, whereas others, such as, for instance, scyllo-inositol and para-aminohippuric acid, are more likely to be the markers of morbidity. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11306-012-0411-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
    Metabolomics 12/2012; 8(6):1227-1235. DOI:10.1007/s11306-012-0411-y · 3.97 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Urinary Tract Infections, 09/2011; , ISBN: 978-953-307-757-4