The effect of early and late umbilical cord clamping on neonatal hematocrit.

Midwifery Department, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Golestan, Iran.
Journal of perinatology: official journal of the California Perinatal Association (Impact Factor: 2.35). 08/2008; 28(8):523-5. DOI: 10.1038/jp.2008.55
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To compare the effect of early and late cord clamping (LCC) on neonatal hematocrit at 2 and 18 h of life.
In this double-blind randomized trial, 64 healthy full-term vaginally born neonates were randomly allocated to either early (30 s) or late (3 min) umbilical cord clamping. During the interval between delivery and cord clamping, the attendant held the neonate supine at the level of the introitus. Neonatal venous hematocrit was measured at 2 and 18 h of life.
Neonatal hematocrit at 2 h of life (61+/-4.9 vs 61.6+/-4.5%) and 18 h of life (56.9+/-4.1 vs 56.2+/-3.9%) was not significantly different between the two groups. This was also true for neonatal polycythemia (20 vs 23.5%). In the LCC group, placental residual blood volume (PRBV) was 39.5% lower and estimated neonatal blood volume (ENBV) was 7.1% higher than that in the early cord clamping (ECC) group (P<0.001).
Late cord clamping does not lead to a significant difference in the hematocrit level of the neonate or neonatal polycythemia, but is associated with a significant increase in ENBV and a significant decrease in PRBV. Further trials should examine the effect of delaying cord clamping for a longer period of time or changing the position that the neonate is held in to determine whether these variations result in more clinically significant results.


Available from: Masoumeh Kordi, Oct 06, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Sixty term infants delivered vaginally were assigned randomly to one of the two management groups; early cord clamping (ECC) or delayed cord clamping (DCC). Six months after delivery, the children in both groups were called back for follow-up. Blood samples were obtained for measuring haemoglobin (Hb), haematocrit (Hct), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH), serum iron (SI), transferrin saturation (TS) and serum ferritin (SF) levels. The mean Hb, HCT, SI and TS at 6 months were significantly higher in the DCC group (95% confidence interval (CI); p<0.001, p<0.001, p<0.024 and p<0.009). The mean SF at 6 months was also higher in the DCC group but it was not significant (p<0.071). Polycythaemia, jaundice and other undesirable side-effects of DCC were not seen. Keywords: Placental transfusion, Delayed cord clamping, Early cord clamping, Anaemia, Infant.
    Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 11/2014; 64(11):1303-1305. · 0.40 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Journal of Neonatology 07/2014; 28(3):87-91..
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Historically, in midwifery and obstetric care, the umbilical cord was not usually clamped until all pulsation of the cord had ceased. This is now referred to as delayed cord clamping or DCC (not clamping umbilical cord before two minutes of life). During the last one hundred years with changes in the ways women give birth, especially the shift toward hospital based birth in the Western world, it became commonplace for the cord to be clamped within 20 -30 seconds of birth (immediate cord clamping or ICC). Authors have postulated various reasons for this shift in timing of umbilical cord clamping to include a possible decreased risk of postpartum hemorrhage, the need for resuscitation of the newborn and sampling of cord blood for stem cells and cord blood analysis. Recent evidence suggests that newborns (particularly in low-resourced settings) would benefit greatly from a policy of DCC with decreased risks of childhood anemia, subsequent seque-lae and the need for supplementation. This systematic review examined recent literature from the last eight years using commonly used academic search engines with associated keywords. The re-sults were carefully collated into a table of findings and outcomes.
    Open Journal of Nursing 10/2014; 4(11):730-736. DOI:10.4236/ojn.2014.411078