Humanistic, utilization, and cost outcomes associated with the use of botulinum toxin for treatment of refractory migraine headaches in a managed care organization

Pharmacy Services, SelectHealth, 4646 West Lake Park, Suite N3, Salt Lake City, UT 84107, USA.
Journal of managed care pharmacy: JMCP (Impact Factor: 2.71). 06/2008; 14(5):442-50.
Source: PubMed


Few patients with migraine syndrome receive treatment with preventive medication regimens, and some of these patients fail to gain adequate migraine relief. Botulinum toxin has been suggested to be effective in the treatment of migraine for a select population. An integrated health system created a medical policy and a supporting preauthorization form that permits coverage of botulinum toxin for the off-label treatment of migraine for patients who (1) fail at least 3 drug classes for acute treatment, (2) fail at least 4 different preventive medication classes, and (3) receive consultation from a neurologist.
To (1) evaluate the impact of botulinum toxin therapy on quality-of-life (QOL) measures evaluated by direct member survey results, and (2) assess the use and cost of migraine-related medications and overall medical and pharmacy services pre- and post-botulinum toxin therapy.
The study was a retrospective analysis of administrative claims data from a 500,000-member integrated health system for the time period January 1, 2003, to October 31, 2007. Administrative claims data were used to identify members with a billing code (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM]) for migraine (346.xx), tension headache (307.81), or headache (784.0) diagnosed by a neurologist. Administrative claims data for these patients were then queried for the use of botulinum toxin for dates of service from January 1, 2003, through October 31, 2006. A survey was sent to the identified patients (N=54) to assess 6 QOL measures associated with the use of botulinum toxin. Self-reported symptomatic improvement was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale for 6 questions regarding headache severity, headache frequency, use of rescue medications, productivity/absenteeism, recreational activities, and life enjoyment. For the subset of patients (n = 32) who maintained health plan eligibility from 18 months before through 18 months after the first botulinum toxin therapy claim (index date), medical and pharmacy claims data were used to assess the utilization and cost of specific medications and overall pharmacy and medical costs for the 18-month pre-index and post-index periods. Cost was defined as allowed charge, which is the sum of plan cost and member cost.
Of 54 surveys sent to all patients identified as having used botulinum toxin for the treatment of migraine from January 1, 2003, to October 31, 2006, 34 surveys were returned (63%). Almost 3 of 4 respondents (73%) reported moderate or better improvement in overall migraine or headache QOL measures, and 27% reported little or no improvement. For the 32 patients with continuous eligibility for the total observation period of 36 months, the average migraine-related pharmacy utilization, excluding botulinum toxin, increased by 50.5%, from 1.84 claims per patient per month (PPPM) in the 18-month pre-index period to 2.77 claims PPPM in the 18-month post-index period (P = 0.011) and by 59.5% by mean days supply (42.58 days to 67.93, P=0.008). Total migraine-related pharmacy cost increased by 80.9%, from $142.08 PPPM to $256.97 PPPM (P=0.013). Acute-treatment migraine-related pharmacy utilization increased from 1.23 claims PPPM to 1.92 claims PPPM (P=0.004). There was no significant change in either the number of claims for migraine prophylaxis medications (0.61 PPPM to 0.85 PPPM, P=0.121) or the use of hospital emergency room services related to migraine or headache (0.07 PPPM vs. 0.10 PPPM, P=0.449). The mean migraine-related and nonmigraine-related (i.e., all-cause) combined medical/hospital and pharmacy expense, including botulinum toxin, increased by 111.3%, from $651.13 PPPM in the pre-index period to $1,376.05 PPPM in the post-index period (P<0.001).
The majority of patients who received botulinum toxin for refractory migraine reported improvement in disease-specific symptoms and overall QOL, but total medical and pharmacy costs were higher in the period after treatment, and there was no reduction in the use of other migraine-related medications.

Download full-text


Available from: Matthew P Mitchell,

  • Journal of managed care pharmacy: JMCP 07/2008; 14(5):465-7. · 2.71 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Botulinum toxin (BTA) is a safe and effective therapeutic tool for many neurological conditions but few studies have investigated its real cost in neurological practice. We evaluated the daily cost of botulinum toxin type A (BTA) treatment through a cost effectiveness analysis alongside a prospective study of BTA injections at a French University Hospital over a 2-year follow-up period. The data of 3,108 BTA injections performed in 870 adult patients presenting with dystonia, facial hemispasm, or spasticity were entered in the database. Patients were questioned at each visit about the subjective effectiveness of the previous injection. The daily cost of BTA treatment was calculated as the ratio of each session's cost (including all additional costs) to the duration of subjective efficacy. The subjective rating of efficacy duration was 17.3 ± 7.7 weeks for facial hemispasm, 15.4 ± 7.7 for blepharospasm, 14.3 ± 6.7 for cervical dystonia, 14.5 ± 7.8 and 14.1 ± 7.4 weeks for upper and lower limb spasticity, respectively. The daily cost of BTA injections was 0.57 ± 0.20 for facial hemispasm, 0.95 ± 0.30 for blepharospasm, 2.85 ± 0.86 for cervical dystonia, 3.38 ± 1.49 and 3.62 ± 1.81 for upper and lower limb spasticity, respectively. When associated costs were considered, the daily cost of BTA injections was clearly increased (45-93%) in limb spasticity or rigidity but remained only modestly increased (15-37%) in other indications. These results obtained in a large cohort of patients show that BTA treatment has a low daily cost for a long-lasting effect, with a daily cost/benefit ratio that greatly depends on the indications.
    Journal of Neurology 03/2011; 258(9):1670-5. DOI:10.1007/s00415-011-5998-9 · 3.38 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study is meant to compare the direct and indirect cost of migraine headache care before and after migraine surgery and to evaluate any postoperative changes in patient participation in daily activities. Eighty-nine patients enrolled in a migraine surgery clinical trial completed the Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire, the Migraine Disability Assessment questionnaire, and a financial cost report preoperatively and 5 years postoperatively. Mean follow-up was 63.0 months (range, 56.9 to 72.6 months). Migraine medication expenses were reduced by a median of $1997.26 annually. Median cost reduction for alternative treatment expenses was $450 annually. Patients had a median of three fewer annual primary care visits for the migraine headache treatment, resulting in a median cost reduction of $320 annually. Patients missed a median of 8.5 fewer days of work or childcare annually postoperatively, with a median regained income of $1525. The median total cost spent on migraine headache treatment was $5820 per year preoperatively, declining to $900 per year postoperatively. Total median cost reduction was $3949.70 per year postoperatively. The mean surgical cost was $8378. Significant improvements were demonstrated in all aspects of the Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire and the Migraine Disability Assessment questionnaire. Surgical deactivation of migraine trigger sites has proven to be effective for the treatment of severe migraine headache. This study illustrates that the surgical treatment is a cost-effective modality, reducing direct and indirect costs. Patients may also expect improvements in the performance of and increased participation in activities of daily living. Therapeutic, IV.
    Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 12/2011; 129(4):871-7. DOI:10.1097/PRS.0b013e318244217a · 2.99 Impact Factor
Show more