Mechanism of Homotropic Control to Coordinate Hydrolysis in a Hexameric AAA+ Ring ATPase

Division of Biology, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Journal of Molecular Biology (Impact Factor: 3.96). 09/2008; 381(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.05.075
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT AAA(+) proteins are ubiquitous mechanochemical ATPases that use energy from ATP hydrolysis to remodel their versatile substrates. The AAA(+) characteristic hexameric ring assemblies raise important questions about if and how six often identical subunits coordinate hydrolysis and associated motions. The PspF AAA(+) domain, PspF(1-275), remodels the bacterial sigma(54)-RNA polymerase to activate transcription. Analysis of ATP substrate inhibition kinetics on ATP hydrolysis in hexameric PspF(1-275) indicates negative homotropic effects between subunits. Functional determinants required for allosteric control identify: (i) an important link between the ATP bound ribose moiety and the SensorII motif that would allow nucleotide-dependent *-helical */beta subdomain dynamics; and (ii) establishes a novel regulatory role for the SensorII helix in PspF, which may apply to other AAA(+) proteins. Consistent with functional data, homotropic control appears to depend on nucleotide state-dependent subdomain angles imposing dynamic symmetry constraints in the AAA(+) ring. Homotropic coordination is functionally important to remodel the sigma(54) promoter. We propose a structural symmetry-based model for homotropic control in the AAA(+) characteristic ring architecture.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: SNARE proteins promote membrane fusion by forming a 4-stranded parallel helical bundle that brings the membranes into close proximity. Post fusion, the complex is disassembled by an AAA+ ATPase called N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor (NSF). We present evidence that NSF uses a processive unwinding mechanism to disassemble SNARE proteins. Using a real-time disassembly assay based on fluorescence dequenching, we correlate NSF-driven disassembly rates with the SNARE-activated ATPase activity of NSF. Neuronal SNAREs activate the ATPase rate of NSF by ~26-fold. One SNARE complex takes an average of ~5 seconds to disassemble in a process that consumes ~50 ATP. Investigations of substrate requirements show that NSF is capable of disassembling a truncated SNARE substrate consisting of only the core SNARE domain, but not an unrelated four-stranded coiled coil. NSF can also disassemble an engineered double-length SNARE complex, suggesting a processive unwinding mechanism. We further investigated processivity using single turnover experiments, which show that SNAREs can be unwound in a single encounter with NSF. We propose a processive helicase-like mechanism for NSF in which ~1 residue is unwound for every hydrolyzed ATP molecule.
    Journal of Biological Chemistry 06/2013; 288(32). DOI:10.1074/jbc.M113.476705 · 4.60 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is largely unknown how the typical homomeric ring geometry of ATPases associated with various cellular activities enables them to perform mechanical work. Small-angle solution X-ray scattering, crystallography, and electron microscopy (EM) reconstructions revealed that partial ATP occupancy caused the heptameric closed ring of the bacterial enhancer-binding protein (bEBP) NtrC1 to rearrange into a hexameric split ring of striking asymmetry. The highly conserved and functionally crucial GAFTGA loops responsible for interacting with σ54-RNA polymerase formed a spiral staircase. We propose that splitting of the ensemble directs ATP hydrolysis within the oligomer, and the ring's asymmetry guides interaction between ATPase and the complex of σ54 and promoter DNA. Similarity between the structure of the transcriptional activator NtrC1 and those of distantly related helicases Rho and E1 reveals a general mechanism in homomeric ATPases whereby complex allostery within the ring geometry forms asymmetric functional states that allow these biological motors to exert directional forces on their target macromolecules.
    Genes & development 11/2013; 27(22):2500-11. DOI:10.1101/gad.229385.113 · 12.64 Impact Factor
  • Revista Espa de Cardiologia 04/2009; 62(4):459-461. DOI:10.1016/S0300-8932(09)70909-1 · 3.34 Impact Factor


Available from
May 27, 2014