The bone diagnostic instrument II: Indentation distance increase.

Paul Hansma, Patricia Turner, Barney Drake, Eugene Yurtsev, Alexander Proctor, Phillip Mathews, Jason Lelujian, Connor Randall, Jonathan Adams, Ralf Jungmann, Federico Garza-de-Leon, Georg Fantner, Haykaz Mkrtchyan, Michael Pontin, Aaron Weaver, Morton B. Brown, Nadder Sahar, Ricardo Rossello, David Kohn

Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USADepartment of Materials Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USADepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USADepartments of Biologic and Materials Sciences, and Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.

Journal Article: Review of Scientific Instruments (impact factor: 1.52). 07/2008; 79(6):064303. DOI: 10.1063/1.2937199

Abstract

The bone diagnostic instrument (BDI) is being developed with the long-term goal of providing a way for researchers and clinicians to measure bone material properties of human bone in vivo. Such measurements could contribute to the overall assessment of bone fragility in the future. Here, we describe an improved BDI, the Osteoprobe IItrade mark. In the Osteoprobe IItrade mark, the probe assembly, which is designed to penetrate soft tissue, consists of a reference probe (a 22 gauge hypodermic needle) and a test probe (a small diameter, sharpened rod) which slides through the inside of the reference probe. The probe assembly is inserted through the skin to rest on the bone. The distance that the test probe is indented into the bone can be measured relative to the position of the reference probe. At this stage of development, the indentation distance increase (IDI) with repeated cycling to a fixed force appears to best distinguish bone that is more easily fractured from bone that is less easily fractured. Specifically, in three model systems, in which previous mechanical testing and/or tests reported here found degraded mechanical properties such as toughness and postyield strain, the BDI found increased IDI. However, it must be emphasized that, at this time, neither the IDI nor any other mechanical measurement by any technique has been shown clinically to correlate with fracture risk. Further, we do not yet understand the mechanism responsible for determining IDI beyond noting that it is a measure of the continuing damage that results from repeated loading. As such, it is more a measure of plasticity than elasticity in the bone.

Source: PubMed

Comments on this publication

ResearchGate members can add comments. Sign up now and post your comment!

Similar publications

Science & Research Jobs

Keywords

22 gauge hypodermic needle
 
bone diagnostic instrument
 
continuing damage
 
degraded mechanical properties
 
distinguish bone
 
fractured
 
human bone
 
improved BDI
 
indentation distance increase
 
measure bone material properties
 
measurements
 
mechanical measurement
 
model systems
 
Osteoprobe IItrade mark
 
postyield strain
 
previous mechanical testing
 
probe assembly
 
reference probe
 
test probe
 
tests