Article

Comparison of HIV Risks among Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Heterosexual Homeless Youth.

Department of Human Development and Family Science, The Ohio State University, 135 Campbell Hall, 1787 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Journal of Youth and Adolescence (Impact Factor: 2.72). 02/2008; 37(4):456-464. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-007-9171-9
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Youth who are homeless and gay, lesbian or bisexual (GLB) are one of the most disenfranchised and marginalized groups in our society. The purpose of this study is to examine and compare HIV in GLB homeless youth with their heterosexual counterparts. Participants for this study included 268 youth involved in treatment outcome studies with substance abusing homeless youth. Results suggest that GLB youth have greater HIV risks and that these risks are greater among bisexual females. In examining the predictors of sexual health risks, survival sex emerged as the most significant. Survival sex was high among females regardless of their sexual orientation and also among gay males. Implications of these findings suggest that a greater emphasis needs to be paid to preventive interventions among this population.

0 Followers
 · 
101 Views
  • Article: Abstracts.
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate the molecular subtypes of prevalent HIV-1 strains and characterize the genetics of dominant strains among men who have sex with men. Molecular epidemiology surveys in this study concentrated on the prevalent HIV-1 strains in Liaoning province by year. 229 adult patients infected with HIV-1 and part of a high-risk group of men who have sex with men were recruited. Reverse transcription and nested PCR amplification were performed. Sequencing reactions were conducted and edited, followed by codon-based alignment. NJ phylogenetic tree analyses detected two distinct CRF01_AE phylogenetic clusters, designated clusters 1 and 2. Clusters 1 and 2 accounted for 12.8% and 84.2% of sequences in the pol gene and 17.6% and 73.1% of sequences in the env gene, respectively. Another six samples were distributed on other phylogenetic clusters. Cluster 1 increased significantly from 5.6% to 20.0%, but cluster 2 decreased from 87.5% to 80.0%. Genetic distance analysis indicated that CRF01_AE cluster 1 in Liaoning was homologous to epidemic CRF01_AE strains, but CRF01_AE cluster 2 was different from other scattered strains. Additionally, significant differences were found in tetra-peptide motifs at the tip of V3 loop between cluster 1 and 2; however, differences in coreceptor usage were not detected. This study shows that subtype CRF01_AE strain may be the most prevalent epidemic strain in the men who have sex with men. Genetic characteristics of the subtype CRF01_AE cluster strain in Liaoning showed homology to the prevalent strains of men who have sex with men in other parts of China. J. Med. Virol. 87:557-568, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Journal of Medical Virology 04/2015; 87(4):557-68. DOI:10.1002/jmv.24116 · 2.22 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is growing interest in network-based interventions to reduce HIV sexual risk behavior among both homeless youth and men who have sex with men. The goal of this study was to better understand the social network and individual correlates of sexual risk behavior among homeless young men who have sex with men (YMSM) to inform these HIV prevention efforts.MethodsA multistage sampling design was used to recruit a probability sample of 121 homeless YMSM (ages: 16–24 years) from shelters, drop-in centers, and street venues in Los Angeles County. Face-to-face interviews were conducted. Because of the different distributions of the three outcome variables, three distinct regression models were needed: ordinal logistic regression for unprotected sex, zero-truncated Poisson regression for number of sex partners, and logistic regression for any sex trade.ResultsHomeless YMSM were less likely to engage in unprotected sex and had fewer sex partners if their networks included platonic ties to peers who regularly attended school, and had fewer sex partners if most of their network members were not heavy drinkers. Most other aspects of network composition were unrelated to sexual risk behavior. Individual predictors of sexual risk behavior included older age, Hispanic ethnicity, lower education, depressive symptoms, less positive condom attitudes, and sleeping outdoors because of nowhere else to stay.ConclusionsHIV prevention programs for homeless YMSM may warrant a multipronged approach that helps these youth strengthen their ties to prosocial peers, develop more positive condom attitudes, and access needed mental health and housing services.
    Journal of Adolescent Health 10/2012; 51(4):386-392. DOI:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.01.015 · 2.75 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Depuis la fin des années 1990 (aux États-Unis, puis dans d’autres pays dont la France), les enquêtes les plus probantes ont mis en évidence un risque suicidaire plus élevé parmi les jeunes des minorités sexuelles – gays, lesbiennes, bisexuel(le)s, transgenres – et ceux qui se questionnent sur leur identité sexuelle ou de genre. L’homophobie est aujourd’hui le facteur de risque le mieux identifié pour comprendre cette sursuicidalité. Les phénomènes d’exclusion, de mépris et de stigmatisation peuvent provoquer une perte d’estime de soi, une perte de confiance dans l’avenir et les autres. Le soupçon de non-conformité de genre – qui peut toucher tout jeune, indépendamment de son orientation sexuelle effective – conduit également souvent la personne qui le subit à une grande détresse qui favorise les symptômes suicidaires. Il existe aujourd’hui en France de nombreuses initiatives de prévention de l’homophobie et du risque suicidaire. Au niveau national, le gouvernement a initié en 2012 un vaste programme d’actions contre les violences et les discriminations commises à raison de l’orientation sexuelle ou de l’identité de genre, qui mobilise plusieurs ministères et s’attache particulièrement à la prévention des risques pour les jeunes LGBTQ. D’autres pistes d’actions, parfois inspirées d’exemples étrangers, pourraient être proposées : développer des équipes d’intervention mobiles, des lieux d’accueil pour les jeunes LGBTQ sans foyer, des groupes de soutien aux proches des jeunes LGBTQ, des programmes pour rendre les écoles plus sûres… La sensibilisation des divers professionnels en contact avec les jeunes pourrait être approfondie ou élargie. Enfi n, pour continuer à améliorer nos connaissances, les enquêtes pourraient intégrer des questions sur ces phénomènes spécifi ques que sont l’homophobie, la lesbophobie, la transphobie et le sexisme.
    INPES, collection « Santé en action » edited by Vincent Fournier, 07/2014; INPES., ISBN: 978-2-9161-9222-2/330-79014-L

Preview

Download
0 Downloads
Available from