Article

EEF2 analysis challenges the monophyly of Archaeplastida and Chromalveolata. PLoS One 3:e2621

Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.23). 02/2008; 3(7):e2621. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002621
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Classification of eukaryotes provides a fundamental phylogenetic framework for ecological, medical, and industrial research. In recent years eukaryotes have been classified into six major supergroups: Amoebozoa, Archaeplastida, Chromalveolata, Excavata, Opisthokonta, and Rhizaria. According to this supergroup classification, Archaeplastida and Chromalveolata each arose from a single plastid-generating endosymbiotic event involving a cyanobacterium (Archaeplastida) or red alga (Chromalveolata). Although the plastids within members of the Archaeplastida and Chromalveolata share some features, no nucleocytoplasmic synapomorphies supporting these supergroups are currently known.
This study was designed to test the validity of the Archaeplastida and Chromalveolata through the analysis of nucleus-encoded eukaryotic translation elongation factor 2 (EEF2) and cytosolic heat-shock protein of 70 kDa (HSP70) sequences generated from the glaucophyte Cyanophora paradoxa, the cryptophytes Goniomonas truncata and Guillardia theta, the katablepharid Leucocryptos marina, the rhizarian Thaumatomonas sp. and the green alga Mesostigma viride. The HSP70 phylogeny was largely unresolved except for certain well-established groups. In contrast, EEF2 phylogeny recovered many well-established eukaryotic groups and, most interestingly, revealed a well-supported clade composed of cryptophytes, katablepharids, haptophytes, rhodophytes, and Viridiplantae (green algae and land plants). This clade is further supported by the presence of a two amino acid signature within EEF2, which appears to have arisen from amino acid replacement before the common origin of these eukaryotic groups.
Our EEF2 analysis strongly refutes the monophyly of the Archaeplastida and the Chromalveolata, adding to a growing body of evidence that limits the utility of these supergroups. In view of EEF2 phylogeny and other morphological evidence, we discuss the possibility of an alternative eukaryotic supergroup.

0 Followers
 · 
150 Views
  • Source
    • "At some point the members of this group, which also includes the cryptophytes, haptophytes, and alveolates as well as the heterokontophytes, acquired their plastid through secondary endosymbiosis of a red alga, explained by the presence of four membranes, the outer one being continuous with the rough endoplasmic reticulum and the outer membrane of the nucleus (Keeling 2009). In recent studies of diatom genomes, however, there have been discoveries of nuclear genes of a green algal origin that are not the result of lateral gene transfer, suggesting a cryptic endosymbiont likely related to prasinophyte-like green algae in an ancestor of chromalveolates (Kim & Graham 2008). The combination of two ancient endosymbiosis events, as well as supplemental horizontal gene transfer, has provided the chromalveolates with the genetic potential to become one of "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Diatoms are one of the largest groups of primary producers in the oceans, yet despite their environmental importance little is known about their plastidial lipid biochemistry. It has been previously reported that Skeletonema species contain primarily C16/C16 and C20/C16 forms of mono- and digalactosyldiacylglycerol (MGDG and DGDG, respectively). Likewise, it was also reported that Phaeodactylum tricornutum contains primarily C16/ C16 and C20/C20 forms of MGDG and DGDG. We seek to relate their studies to other diatoms, both in the centrics and pennates, with particular focus on the marennineproducing pennate diatom, Haslea ostrearia. To this end, the composition and positional distribution of fatty acids of MGDG and DGDG were examined using positive-ion electrospray ionization/mass spectrometry (ESI/MS). Two centric diatoms, Skeletonema marinoi and Thalassiosira weissflogii, and the pennate diatom, P. tricornutum, contained primarily C20/C16 (sn-1/sn-2) and C18/C16 forms of MGDG and DGDG. The other pennate diatoms, H. ostrearia and Navicula perminuta, contained primarily C18/C16 or C18/C18 forms of MGDG and DGDG, indicating a previously unrecognized fatty acid diversity in diatom MGDG and DGDG.
    Phycological Research 07/2013; 61:199-207. DOI:10.1111/pre.12015 · 1.27 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Due to the differences in taxa sampled and ambiguous alignment, the findings of previous phylogenetic studies based on 18S rDNAs vary extensively from each other (Cavalier-Smith and Chao, 1996; Kumar and Rzhetsky, 1996; Van de Peer and De Wachter, 1997; Burki et al., 2002; Kostka et al., 2004; Nikolaev et al., 2004; Polet et al., 2004; Shalchian-Tabrizi et al., 2006; Shalchian-Tabrizi et al., 2007). Additionally because of the effects of sparse taxon sampling and heterogeneity in the sequence data, the results of the studies based on multiple proteins or protein-coding genes are also quite different from each other (Baldauf et al., 2000; Philippe et al., 2004; Harper et al., 2005; Rodríguez- Ezpeleta et al., 2005; Burki and Pawlowski, 2006; Burki et al., 2007; Hackett et al., 2007; Patron et al., 2007; Kim and Graham, 2008). Only Opisthokonta, also known as the Fungi- Metazoa group, appears in all of the studies of eukaryote interrelationships (Parfrey et al., 2006). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ribosomal RNAs are important because they catalyze the synthesis of peptides and proteins. Comparative studies of the secondary structure of 18S rRNA have revealed the basic locations of its many length-conserved and length-variable regions. In recent years, many more sequences of 18S rDNA with unusual lengths have been documented in GenBank. These data make it possible to recognize the diversity of the secondary and tertiary structures of 18S rRNAs and to identify the length-conserved parts of 18S rDNAs. The longest 18S rDNA sequences of almost every known eukaryotic phylum were included in this study. We illustrated the bioinformatics-based structure to show that, the regions that are more length-variable, regions that are less length-variable, the splicing sites for introns, and the sites of A-minor interactions are mostly distributed in different parts of the 18S rRNA. Additionally, this study revealed that some length-variable regions or insertion positions could be quite close to the functional part of the 18S rRNA of Foraminifera organisms. The tertiary structure as well as the secondary structure of 18S rRNA can be more diverse than what was previously supposed. Besides revealing how this interesting gene evolves, it can help to remove ambiguity from the alignment of eukaryotic 18S rDNAs and to improve the performance of 18S rDNA in phylogenetic reconstruction. Six nucleotides shared by Archaea and Eukaryota but rarely by Bacteria are also reported here for the first time, which might further support the supposed origin of eukaryote from archaeans.
    Protein & Cell 02/2011; 2(2):161-70. DOI:10.1007/s13238-011-1017-2 · 2.85 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "It has been suggested that 100+ genes are necessary to recover " Archaeplastida " with strong support (Rodríguez-Ezpeleta et al. 2005). The Archaeplastida hypothesis is not supported in our analyses (Tables 1 and S6 and Figs. 1 and 2) or those of others (Parfrey et al. 2006; Kim and Graham 2008; Yoon et al. 2008; Hampl et al. 2009). Here, the " Archaeplastida " lineages red algae, green algae, and glaucocystophytes are never monophyletic, but instead generally form a poorly supported cluster with the secondarily photosynthetic haptophytes and cryptomonads plus other nonphotosynthetic lineages (Table 1 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An accurate reconstruction of the eukaryotic tree of life is essential to identify the innovations underlying the diversity of microbial and macroscopic (e.g., plants and animals) eukaryotes. Previous work has divided eukaryotic diversity into a small number of high-level "supergroups," many of which receive strong support in phylogenomic analyses. However, the abundance of data in phylogenomic analyses can lead to highly supported but incorrect relationships due to systematic phylogenetic error. Furthermore, the paucity of major eukaryotic lineages (19 or fewer) included in these genomic studies may exaggerate systematic error and reduce power to evaluate hypotheses. Here, we use a taxon-rich strategy to assess eukaryotic relationships. We show that analyses emphasizing broad taxonomic sampling (up to 451 taxa representing 72 major lineages) combined with a moderate number of genes yield a well-resolved eukaryotic tree of life. The consistency across analyses with varying numbers of taxa (88-451) and levels of missing data (17-69%) supports the accuracy of the resulting topologies. The resulting stable topology emerges without the removal of rapidly evolving genes or taxa, a practice common to phylogenomic analyses. Several major groups are stable and strongly supported in these analyses (e.g., SAR, Rhizaria, Excavata), whereas the proposed supergroup "Chromalveolata" is rejected. Furthermore, extensive instability among photosynthetic lineages suggests the presence of systematic biases including endosymbiotic gene transfer from symbiont (nucleus or plastid) to host. Our analyses demonstrate that stable topologies of ancient evolutionary relationships can be achieved with broad taxonomic sampling and a moderate number of genes. Finally, taxon-rich analyses such as presented here provide a method for testing the accuracy of relationships that receive high bootstrap support (BS) in phylogenomic analyses and enable placement of the multitude of lineages that lack genome scale data.
    Systematic Biology 10/2010; 59(5):518-33. DOI:10.1093/sysbio/syq037 · 11.53 Impact Factor
Show more

Preview (3 Sources)

Download
5 Downloads
Available from