Article

Toxmatch--a chemical classification and activity prediction tool based on similarity measures.

Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, Joint Research Centre-European Commission, 21027 Ispra (VA), Italy.
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology (Impact Factor: 2.13). 08/2008; 52(2):77-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.05.012
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Chemical similarity forms the underlying basis for the development of (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationships ((Q)SARs), expert systems and chemical groupings. Recently a new software tool to facilitate chemical similarity calculations named Toxmatch was developed. Toxmatch encodes a number of similarity indices to help in the systematic development of chemical groupings, including endpoint specific groupings and read-across, and the comparison of model training and test sets. Two rule-based classification schemes were additionally implemented, namely: the Verhaar scheme for assigning mode of action for aquatic toxicants and the BfR rulebase for skin irritation and corrosion. In this study, a variety of different descriptor-based similarity indices were used to evaluate and compare the BfR training set with respect to its test set. The descriptors utilised in this comparison were the same as those used to derive the original BfR rules i.e. the descriptors selected were relevant for skin irritation/corrosion. The Euclidean distance index was found to be the most predictive of the indices in assessing the performance of the rules.

1 Bookmark
 · 
119 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The methods and tools of computational toxicology form an essential and integrating pillar in the new paradigm of predictive toxicology, which seeks to develop more efficient and effective means of assessing chemical toxicity, while also reducing animal testing. The increasingly prominent role of computational toxicology in the implementation of European chemicals' legislation is described, along with initiatives by the European Commission's Joint Research Centre to promote the acceptance and use of computational methods. Outstanding needs and scientific challenges are also outlined. In recent years, there have been impressive scientific and technological advances in computational toxicology. However, considerable progress is still needed to increase the acceptance of computational methods, and in particular to develop a deeper and common understanding of how to apply computational toxicology in regulatory decision making.
    Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism &amp Toxicology 07/2010; 6(7):785-92. · 2.94 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Innovative biomedical techniques operational at the nanoscale level are being developed in therapeutics, including advanced drug delivery systems and targeted nanotherapy. Given the large number of nanoparticles that are being developed for possible biomedical use, the use of computational methods in the assessment of their properties is of key importance. Among the in silico methods, quantum mechanics is still used rarely in the study of nanostructured particles. This review provides an overview of some of the main quantum mechanics methods that are already used in the assessment of chemicals. Furthermore, classical tools used in the chemistry field are described, to show their potential also in the pharmacological field. The current status of computational methods in terms of availability and applicability to nanoparticles, and recommendations for further research are highlighted. The in silico modelling of nanoparticles can assist in targeting and filling gaps in knowledge on the effects of these particular particles. Computational models of the behaviour of nanoparticles in biological systems, including simulation models for predicting intermolecular interactions and harmful side effects, can be highly valuable in screening candidate particles for potential biomedical use in diagnostics, imaging and drug delivery.
    Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery 03/2010; 7(3):295-305. · 4.87 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this chapter is to outline the different ways in which quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) methods can be used in the regulatory assessment of chemicals. The chapter draws on experience gained in the European Union in the assessment of industrial chemicals, as well as recently developed guidance for the use of QSARs within specific legislative frameworks such as REACH and the Water Framework Directive. This chapter reviews the concepts of QSAR validity, applicability, and acceptability and emphasises that the use of individual QSAR estimates is highly context-dependent, which has implications in terms of the confidence needed in the model validity. In addition to the potential use of QSAR models as stand-alone estimation methods, it is expected that QSARs will be used within the context of broader weight-of-evidence approaches, such as chemical categories and integrated testing strategies; therefore, the role of (Q)SARs within these approaches is explained. This chapter also refers to a range of freely available software tools being developed to facilitate the use of QSARs for regulatory purposes. Finally, some conclusions are drawn concerning current needs for the further development and uptake of QSARs KeywordsREACH-Regulatory assessment-Validity-Applicability-and adequacy of QSAR
    12/2009: pages 367-382;