Determining the composition and benefit of the pre-hospital medical response team in the conflict setting.

Consultant Emergency Medicine, 16 Close Support Medical Regiment, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow G51 4TF.
Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps (Impact Factor: 0.81). 01/2008; 153(4):269-73. DOI: 10.1136/jramc-153-04-10
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To determine the optimal composition o f the pre-hospital medical response team (MERT) and the value of pre-hospital critical care interventions in a military setting, and specifically to determine both the benefit of including a doctor in the pre-hospital response team and the relevance of the time and distance to definitive care.
A comprehensive review of the literature incorporating a range of electronic search engines and hand searches of key journals.
There was no level 1 evidence on which to base conclusions. The 15 most relevant articles were analysed in detail. There was one randomized controlled trial (level 2 evidence) that supports the inclusion of a doctor on MERT. Several cohort studies were identified that analysed the benefits of specific critical care interventions in the pre-hospital setting.
A doctor with critical care skills deployed on the MERT is associated with improved survival in victims of major trauma. Specific critical care interventions including emergency endotracheal intubation and ventilation, and intercostal drainage are associated with improved survival and functional recovery in certain patients. These benefits appear to be more easily demonstrated for the rural and remote setting than for the urban setting.

  • Source
    Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps 09/2011; 157(3 Suppl 1):S305-9. · 0.81 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The management of trauma patients has matured significantly since a systematic approach to trauma care was introduced nearly a half century ago. The resuscitation continuum emphasizes the effect that initial therapy has on the outcome of the trauma patient. The initiation of this continuum begins with prompt field medical care and efficient transportation to designated trauma centers, where lifesaving procedures are immediately undertaken. Resuscitation with packed red blood cells and plasma, in parallel with surgical or interventional radiologic source control of bleeding, are the cornerstones of trauma management. Adjunctive pharmacologic therapy can assist with resuscitation. Tranexamic acid is used in Europe with good results, but the drug is slowly being added to the pharmacy formulary of trauma centers in United States. Recombinant factor VIIa can correct abnormal coagulation values, but its outcome benefit is less clear. Vasopressin shows promise in animal studies and case reports, but has not been subjected to a large clinical trial. The concept of "early goal-directed therapy" used in sepsis may be applicable in trauma as well. An early, appropriately aggressive resuscitation with blood products, as well as adjunctive pharmacologic therapy, may attenuate the systemic inflammatory response of trauma. Future investigations will need to determine whether this approach offers a similar survival benefit.
    Anesthesia and analgesia 07/2012; · 3.42 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The UK military trauma system on contemporary operations has evolved substantially in the last decade, drawing on clinical experience from post-conflict peace-enforcing in Kosovo and combat operations in both Iraq and Afghanistan. It has matured so that training, equipment, and clinical guidelines are integrated from point of wounding through to field hospital care, and that clinical practice is rigorously governed from pre-hospital care through to rehabilitation.


Available from