Article

Neural cell transplantation effects on sciatic nerve regeneration after a standardized crush injury in the rat.

Centro de Estudos de Ciência Animal (CECA), Instituto de Ciências e Tecnologias Agrárias e Agro-Alimentares (ICETA), Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, Rua P. Armando Quintas, Vairão, Portugal.
Microsurgery (Impact Factor: 1.62). 08/2008; 28(6):458-70. DOI: 10.1002/micr.20524
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The goal of the present study was to assess whether in vitro-differentiated N1E-115 cells supported by a collagen membrane would enhance rat sciatic nerve regeneration after a crush injury. To set up an appropriate experimental model for investigating the effects of neural cell transplantation, we have recently described the sequence of functional and morphologic changes occurring after a standardized sciatic nerve crush injury with a nonserrated clamp. Functional recovery was evaluated using the sciatic functional index, the static sciatic index, the extensor postural thrust, the withdrawal reflex latency, and ankle kinematics. In addition, histomorphometric analysis was carried out on regenerated nerve fibers by means of the 2D-disector method. Based on the results of the EPT and of some of the ankle locomotor kinematic parameters analyzed, the hypothesis that N1E-115 cells may enhance nerve regeneration is partially supported although histomorphometry disclosed no significant difference in nerve fiber regeneration between the different experimental groups. Therefore, results suggest that enrichment of equine type III collagen membrane with the N1E-115 cellular system in the rat sciatic nerve crush model may support recovery, at least in terms of motor function. The discrepancy between functional and morphological results also suggests that the combined use of functional and morphological analysis should be recommended for an overall assessment of recovery in nerve regeneration studies.

1 Bookmark
 · 
94 Views
  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study describes a method that not only generates an automatic and standardized crush injury in the skull base, but also provides investigators with the option to choose from a range of varying pressure levels. We designed an automatic, non-serrated forceps that exerts a varying force of 0 to 100 g and lasts for a defined period of 0 to 60 seconds. This device was then used to generate a crush injury to the right oculomotor nerve of dogs with a force of 10 g for 15 seconds, resulting in a deficit in the pupil-light reflex and ptosis. Further testing of our model with Toluidine-blue staining demonstrated that, at 2 weeks post-surgery disordered oculomotor nerve fibers, axonal loss, and a thinner than normal myelin sheath were visible. Electrophysiological examination showed occasional spontaneous potentials. Together, these data verified that the model for oculomotor nerve injury was successful, and that the forceps we designed can be used to establish standard mechanical injury models of peripheral nerves.
    Neural Regeneration Research 11/2012; 7(32):2516-21. · 0.14 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Regeneration in the peripheral nervous system (PNS) is widely studied both for its relevance to human disease and to understand the robust regenerative response mounted by PNS neurons thereby possibly illuminating the failures of CNS regeneration(1). Sciatic nerve crush (axonotmesis) is one of the most common models of peripheral nerve injury in rodents(2). Crushing interrupts all axons but Schwann cell basal laminae are preserved so that regeneration is optimal(3,4). This allows the investigator to study precisely the ability of a growing axon to interact with both the Schwann cell and basal laminae(4). Rats have generally been the preferred animal models for experimental nerve crush. They are widely available and their lesioned sciatic nerve provides a reasonable approximation of human nerve lesions(5,4). Though smaller in size than rat nerve, the mouse nerve has many similar qualities. Most importantly though, mouse models are increasingly valuable because of the wide availability of transgenic lines now allows for a detailed dissection of the individual molecules critical for nerve regeneration(6, 7). Prior investigators have used multiple methods to produce a nerve crush or injury including simple angled forceps, chilled forceps, hemostatic forceps, vascular clamps, and investigator-designed clamps(8,9,10,11,12). Investigators have also used various methods of marking the injury site including suture, carbon particles and fluorescent beads(13,14,1). We describe our method to obtain a reproducibly complete sciatic nerve crush with accurate and persistent marking of the crush-site using a fine hemostatic forceps and subsequent carbon crush-site marking. As part of our description of the sciatic nerve crush procedure we have also included a relatively simple method of muscle whole mount we use to subsequently quantify regeneration.
    Journal of Visualized Experiments 01/2012;