Pragmatic Collaborations: Advancing Knowledge While Controlling Opportunism.

Industrial and Corporate Change (Impact Factor: 1.37). 02/2000; 9(3):443-87.
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT This paper starts from the observation that firms are increasingly engaging in collaborations with their suppliers, even as they are reducing the extent to which they are vertically integrated with those suppliers. This fact seems incompatible with traditional theories of the firm, which argue that integration is necessary to avoid the potential for hold-ups created when non-contractible investments are made. Our view is that pragmatist mechanisms such as benchmarking, simultaneous engineering and "root cause" error detection and correction make possible "learning by monitoring"--a relationship in which firms and their collaborators continuously improve their joint products and processes without the need for a clear division of property rights. We argue that pragmatic collaborations based on "learning by monitoring" both advance knowledge and control opportunism and thus align interests between the collaborators. Copyright 2000 by Oxford University Press.


Available from: Charles F. Sabel, May 29, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The issue of vocational learning (VL) for older workers (OWs) has become pivotal in European regions with an ageing workforce and facing economic changes and pressure to innovate. European Union policies recognize the value of formal, non-formal and informal learning to enhance workers’ skills, but report low participation of OWs in continuing formal VL. I contend that EU documents conceptualize learning according to a ‘cognitivist’ view and motivation as an individual endeavour, failing to acknowledge OWs’ subjectivities and working activities in providing the context for the development of their motives for learning. I adopt Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) to direct the attention to the OWs’ subjectivities and their personal relationships with their objects of activities (work). CHAT allows subjectivities and activities to be brought together in a holistic framework. To illuminate the different ways in which objects influence motivation and learning, I introduce sociological strategies of production as objects of industrial activities and identify two radically different models as mass production and flexible specialization. Two case studies, based on unstructured interviews with OWs and managers in two firms representing both production models, provide elements to analyse the interrelation between OWs’ activities objects and their personal senses of these. My thesis concludes that: (i) OWs’ relation with their work contexts, rather than their personal qualities, influences their engagement in their working practices and leads to the development of motives for learning; (ii) strategies of production influence the intensity and richness of OWs’ workplace learning; (iii) OWs’ previous and parallel experiences of active roles contribute to the judgement of the current work and to engagement in this; (iv) EU policies for VL need to take into account how to support the OWs’ engagement in their jobs.
    07/2013, Degree: Doctor of Philosophy, Supervisor: David Guile; Karen Evans
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As modern industrial products become increasingly complex, their development and production must draw on a wide range of external ideas, component technologies and complementary capabilities. In this landscape it is virtually impossible for any single firm to keep abreast of all relevant technological advances. This means that ‘what firms do’ involves the targeted development of specialized knowledge assets, using inputs from a wider range of other science and non-science knowledge areas. Additionally firms also make some of their specialized knowledge assets available to other actors. These activities are referred here to as their open innovation practices. The networks maintained by individual firms located within a national or regional economy represent the micro-foundations for learning and knowledge embedding at the larger system level. Knowledge development and accumulation at the firm-level enrich the wider economy by laying the basis for labor market mobility and personal network formation and by promoting collaborative ties. Territorial (national, regional) economies therefore represent potential melting pots for on-going experimental diffusion, recombination and transformation of specialized industrial and scientific knowledge. In the report we explore these aspects of open innovation practices. The point of departure is the current notion of open innovation and the subsequent attempts made at transforming this firm-level management concept into more global perspectives on innovation and growth. While contributing to a more nuanced theoretical conceptualisation of open innovation, our main contribution is the large-scale empirical analysis (130,000 firms from 22 European countries) of open innovation impacts and determinants which have been conducted based on the pan-European Community Innovation Survey. In light of this material, an extensive survey of current and relevant policy measures is provided. The overall aim of the conceptual, empirical, and policy components of the report is to promote the emergence of a new policy discussion in the area of open innovation.