Article

How to Treat Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee: Surgical Techniques and New Trends AAOS Exhibit Selection

III Clinic of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna 20136, Italy.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Impact Factor: 4.31). 01/2012; 94(1):e1(1-8). DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00748
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Osteochondritis dissecans is a relatively common cause of knee pain. The aim of this study was to describe the outcomes of five different surgical techniques in a series of sixty patients with osteochondritis dissecans.
Sixty patients (age 22.4 ± 7.4 years, sixty-two knees) with osteochondritis dissecans of a femoral condyle (forty-five medial and seventeen lateral) were treated with osteochondral autologous transplantation, autologous chondrocyte implantation with bone graft, biomimetic nanostructured osteochondral scaffold (MaioRegen) implantation, bone-cartilage paste graft, or a "one-step" bone-marrow-derived cell transplantation technique. Preoperative and follow-up evaluation included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, the EuroQol visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) score, radiographs, and magnetic resonance imaging.
The global mean IKDC score improved from 40.1 ± 14.3 preoperatively to 77.2 ± 21.3 (p < 0.0005) at 5.3 ± 4.7 years of follow-up, and the EQ-VAS improved from 51.7 ± 17.0 to 83.5 ± 18.3 (p < 0.0005). No influence of age, lesion size, duration of follow-up, or previous surgical procedures on the result was found. The only difference among the results of the surgical procedures was a trend toward better results following autologous chondrocyte implantation (p = 0.06).
All of the techniques were effective in achieving good clinical and radiographic results in patients with osteochondritis dissecans, and the effectiveness of autologous chondrocyte implantation was confirmed at a mean follow-up of five years. Newer techniques such as MaioRegen implantation and the "one-step" transplantation technique are based on different rationales; the first relies on the characteristics of the scaffold and the second on the regenerative potential of mesenchymal cells. Both of these newer procedures have the advantage of being minimally invasive and requiring a single operation.

Full-text

Available from: Elizaveta Kon, Jan 21, 2015
2 Followers
 · 
261 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The repair of osteochondral defects requires a tissue engineering approach that aims at mimicking the physiological properties and structure of two different tissues (cartilage and bone) using specifically-designed scaffold-cell constructs. Biphasic and triphasic approaches utilize two or three different architectures, materials, or composites to produce a multilayered construct. This paper gives an overview of some of the current strategies in multiphasic/gradient-based scaffold architectures and compositions for tissue engineering of osteochondral defects. In addition, the application of finite element analysis (FEA) in scaffold design and simulation of in vitro and in vivo cell growth outcomes has been briefly covered. FEA-based approaches can potentially be coupled with computer-assisted fabrication systems for controlled deposition and additive manufacturing (AM) of the simulated patterns. Finally, a summary of the existing challenges associated with the repair of osteochondral defects as well as some recommendations for future directions have been brought up in the concluding section of this paper. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.a.35356/abstract
    Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 10/2014; DOI:10.1002/jbm.a.35356 · 2.83 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: the aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the knee with a type-I collagen-hydroxyapatite nanostructural biomimetic osteochondral scaffold. twenty-three patients affected by symptomatic knee OCD of the femoral condyles, grade 3 or 4 of the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) scale, underwent biomimetic scaffold implantation. The site of the defect was the medial femoral condyle in 14 patients, whereas in 9 patients the lateral femoral condyle was involved. The average size of the defects was 3.5±1.43 cm(2). All patients were clinically evaluated using the ICRS subjective score, the IKDC objective score, the EQ-VAS and the Tegner Activity Score. Minimum follow-up was two years. MRI was performed at 12 and 24 months after surgery and then every 12 months thereafter. the ICRS subjective score improved from the baseline value of 50.93±20.6 to 76.44±18.03 at the 12 months (p<0.0005) and 82.23± 17.36 at the two-year follow-up (p<0.0005). The IKDC objective score confirmed the results. The EQ-VAS showed a significant improvement from 3.15±1.09 to 8.15±1.04 (p<0.0005) at two years of follow-up. The Tegner Activity Score improvement was statistically significant (p<0.0005). biomimetic scaffold implantation was a good procedure for treating grade 3 and 4 OCD, in which other classic techniques are burdened by different limitations. This open one-step surgery gave promising stable results at short-term follow-up. Level IV, therapeutic case series.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Treatment of osteochondral injuries is challenging, and no gold standard has been established. Layered cell-free scaffolds are a new treatment option for these defects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the osteochondral repair in patients treated with the MaioRegen(®) scaffold, a cell-free biomimetic scaffold consisting of type I collagen and hydroxyapatite. Treatment using this scaffold has previously shown promising clinical results. Ten patients with osteochondral lesions in the knee (n = 6) or in the talus (n = 4) were enrolled. The patients underwent pre-operative MRI and CT scans and were assessed at 1- and 2.5-year timescales post-operatively. The cartilage and bone formations were evaluated semi-quantitatively using the MOCART score. Knee patients were clinically evaluated using KOOS, subjective IKDC and Tegner scores, whereas ankle patients were evaluated using AOFAS Hindfoot and Tegner scores. Two patients were re-operated and excluded from further follow-up due to treatment failure. None of the patients had complete regeneration of the subchondral bone evaluated using CT. At 2.5 years, 6/8 patients had no or very limited (<10 %) bone formation in the defects and 2/8 had 50-75 % bone formation in the treated defect. MRI showed no improvement in the MOCART score at any time point. The IKDC score improved from 41.3 to 80.7, and the KOOS pain subscale improved from 63.8 to 90.8 at 2.5-year follow-up. No improvement was found with the remaining KOOS subscales, the Tegner or AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot score. Treatment of osteochondral defects in the ankle and knee joint with a biomimetic scaffold resulted in incomplete cartilage repair and poor subchondral bone repair at 1- and 2.5-year follow-up. Clinical significant improvements were observed. These results raise serious concerns about the biological repair potential of the MaioRegen(®) scaffold, and we advise to use the MaioRegen(®) scaffold with caution. Prospective therapeutic study, Level IV.
    Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy 02/2015; DOI:10.1007/s00167-015-3538-3 · 2.84 Impact Factor