The pivot shift: A global user guide

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, 3200 S Water Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15203, USA.
Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy (Impact Factor: 3.05). 03/2012; 20(4):724-31. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1859-4
Source: PubMed


The use of several different maneuvers for the pivot shift test has resulted in inconsistent quantitative measurements. The purpose of this study was to describe, analyze, and group several surgeon-specific techniques for the pivot shift test and to propose a standardized pivot shift test.
Twelve expert surgeons examined a whole lower cadaveric extremity with their preferred technique and assigned a clinical grade, I-III. Anterior tibial translation and acceleration were measured using an electromagnetic system. The test was repeated after watching an instructional video focused on a standardized pivot shift technique. Measurements were repeated and compared with the preferred technique.
The expert surgeons utilized valgus stress unanimously in addition to fixed internal rotation (n = 5), fixed external rotation (n = 1), a motion-allowing technique (n = 3), a dislocation-type maneuver (n = 2), and a fixed anterior drawer type of maneuver in extension (n = 1). Anterior tibial translation measured was on average 15.9 ± 3.7 mm. Average tibial acceleration was 3.3 ± 2.1 mm/s(2). Average clinical grading was 2.3 ± 0.5. There were no differences in average clinical grading when using high stress (2.5 ± 0.6) versus low stress (2.3 ± 0.5, n.s.), or using fixed rotation (2.2 ± 0.5) versus a motion-allowing technique (2.3 ± 0.6; n.s.).
Clinical grading, tibial translation, and acceleration vary between examiners performing the pivot shift test. High forces and extremes of rotation are not necessary to produce a clinical detectable pivot shift. In the future, a standardized pivot shift test-which can be performed universally and utilizes only gentle forces allowing motion to occur-may be beneficial when assessing differences in outcome following ACL reconstruction.

Download full-text


Available from: Paulo Araujo, Mar 11, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Our knowledge on anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) pathomechanics has increased. The diagnosis of partial ACL tears must be accurate in order to adjust the operative planning to anatomic status and injury severity. Instrumented measurement of knee laxity is a useful preoperative tool to quantify anterior tibial translation and several laximetry tests are available. Yet, their accuracy remains to be established. HYPOTHESIS: Clinical examination combined to instrumented laximetry with Telos™ 15kg and/or Rolimeter™ would increase their sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of various ACL injury patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and seventy-seven patients were prospectively included. The ACL status was validated by arthroscopy. Around 69.5% had a complete ACL tear and 30.5% had a partial ACL tear. RESULTS: Gross laxity with positive clinical tests was associated with complete ACL tears. Mean side-to-side difference was significantly greater with both laximetry methods in complete versus partial ACL tears. Laximetry results among different types of partial tears were not significantly different. Telos™ results were consistent with gross laxity confirmed by pivot-shift test, while this was not recorded with Rolimeter™. Gross laxity with clinical tests and anterior tibial translation more than 5mm with Telos™ were substantially associated with complete ACL tears. DISCUSSION: The combination of standard clinical examination with Telos™ was more accurate than with Rolimeter™ in the preoperative identification of the ACL injury pattern. Applying additional diagnostic tools can help the surgeon to preoperatively diagnose partial or complete ACL ruptures and propose an injury-specific surgical treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III (case-control study).
    Orthopaedics & Traumatology Surgery & Research 10/2012; 98(7). DOI:10.1016/j.otsr.2012.07.003 · 1.26 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: Several studies have suggested that the iliotibial (IT) band plays a role in knee laxity and that it may affect the magnitude of the pivot shift observed. However, the extent of the role played by the IT band, as well as its mechanism of action, is not currently known. This cadaveric study aimed to quantify the effect of the IT band and the hip abduction angle on the magnitude of anterior tibial translation (ATT) during the pivot shift. Methods: Six fresh-frozen hip-to-toes specimens were used. Serial sectioning of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and the IT band was performed. Lachman and mechanized pivot shift manoeuvres were employed at each stage, and ATT of the lateral and medial compartments was measured using navigation. Three hip abduction angles were tested for each condition: 0°, 15° and 30°. Results: Sequential sectioning of the ACL and the IT band resulted in a significant increase in ATT in both the lateral (Intact = 0 ± 0.5 mm; ACL deficient = 8.1 ± 0.2 mm; ACL + IT deficient = 10.8 ± 0.3 mm) and medial (Intact = 6.7 ± 0.4 mm; ACL deficient = 8.4 ± 0.3 mm; ACL + IT deficient = 9.9 ± 0.3 mm) compartments. No significant increase in ATT was observed after changing the hip abduction angle at each stage. Conclusions: An increase in the magnitude of the pivot shift and the Lachman was observed as the constraint of the IT band was removed. Additionally, it was shown that the hip abduction angle at which the pivot shift test was performed did not significantly affect the magnitude of ATT in this cadaveric model.
    Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy 10/2012; 21(9). DOI:10.1007/s00167-012-2257-2 · 3.05 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction Avec la meilleure connaissance anatomique du ligament croisé antérieur (LCA), le diagnostic de lésion du LCA, partielle ou totale doit être précis pour adapter la planification préopératoire à l’état anatomique. Les mesures instrumentées de la translation tibiale antérieure sont fondamentales pour quantifier l’importance de la laxité du genou. Plusieurs tests laximétriques sont disponibles, mais leur exactitude respective reste à établir. Hypothèse La combinaison de l’examen clinique et d’une mesure instrumentée par le Telos™ à 15 kg et/ou le Rolimeter™ améliore la sensibilité et la spécificité du diagnostic du type de rupture du LCA. Patients et méthode Cent soixante-dix-sept patients ont été inclus de façon prospective. La validation du type lésionnel étant faite par arthroscopie. Le taux de 69,5 % avait une rupture complète et 30,5 % une rupture partielle. Résultat Les laxités antérieures importantes avec des tests cliniques positifs étaient associées aux ruptures complètes du LCA. Le différentiel des translations tibiales antérieures était augmenté de façon significative dans les deux méthodes d’évaluation laximétrique. Une différence significative existait entre les ruptures partielles et les ruptures complètes. On ne pouvait établir de différence entre les types de lésions partielles. Le résultat du Telos™ était fiable dans les laxités importantes avec un ressaut positif alors que ce n’était pas toujours le cas avec le Rolimeter™. Les laxités importantes avec des tests cliniques positifs et une translation tibiale antérieure différentielle de plus de 5 mm au Telos™ montraient une association significative avec des ruptures complètes du LCA. Discussion La combinaison de l’examen clinique au Telos™ est plus précise qu’avec le Rolimeter™ dans l’identification préopératoire du type de rupture du LCA. L’utilisation de ces instruments diagnostiques peut aider le chirurgien dans le diagnostic différentiel entre ruptures partielles et complètes et dans le choix d’une chirurgie adaptée à l’état anatomique du patient. Niveau de preuve Niveau III étude cas contrôle.
    Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique 11/2012; 98(7):685–692. DOI:10.1016/j.rcot.2012.08.269
Show more