Article

Brain Glucose Sensors Play a Significant Role in the Regulation of Pancreatic Glucose-Stimulated Insulin Secretion

Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge Metabolic Research Laboratories, and National Institute for Health Research, Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
Diabetes (Impact Factor: 8.47). 12/2011; 61(2):321-8. DOI: 10.2337/db11-1050
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT As patients decline from health to type 2 diabetes, glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) typically becomes impaired. Although GSIS is driven predominantly by direct sensing of a rise in blood glucose by pancreatic β-cells, there is growing evidence that hypothalamic neurons control other aspects of peripheral glucose metabolism. Here we investigated the role of the brain in the modulation of GSIS. To examine the effects of increasing or decreasing hypothalamic glucose sensing on glucose tolerance and insulin secretion, glucose or inhibitors of glucokinase, respectively, were infused into the third ventricle during intravenous glucose tolerance tests (IVGTTs). Glucose-infused rats displayed improved glucose handling, particularly within the first few minutes of the IVGTT, with a significantly lower area under the excursion curve within the first 10 min (AUC0-10). This was explained by increased insulin secretion. In contrast, infusion of the glucokinase inhibitors glucosamine or mannoheptulose worsened glucose tolerance and decreased GSIS in the first few minutes of IVGTT. Our data suggest a role for brain glucose sensors in the regulation of GSIS, particularly during the early phase. We propose that pharmacological agents targeting hypothalamic glucose-sensing pathways may represent novel therapeutic strategies for enhancing early phase insulin secretion in type 2 diabetes.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Cy Yueh, Jul 03, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
177 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Physiological fluctuations in the levels of hormones, nutrients, and gasses are sensed in parallel by interacting control systems distributed throughout the brain and body. We discuss the logic of this arrangement and the definitions of "sensing"; and then focus on lateral hypothalamic (LH) control of energy balance and respiration. LH neurons control diverse behavioural and autonomic processes by projecting throughout the neuraxis. Three recently characterized types of LH cells are discussed here. LH orexin/hypocretin (ORX) neurons fire predominantly during wakefulness and are thought to promote reward-seeking, arousal, obesity resistance, and adaptive thermogenesis. Bidirectional control of ORX cells by extracellular macronutrients may add a new regulatory loop to these processes. ORX neurons also stimulate breathing and are activated by acid/CO2in vivo and in vitro. LH melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) neurons fire mostly during sleep, promote physical inactivity, weight gain, and may impair glucose tolerance. Reported stimulation of MCH neurons by glucose may thus modulate energy homeostasis. Leptin receptor (LepR) neurons of the LH are distinct from ORX and MCH neurons, and may suppress feeding and locomotion by signaling to the mesolimbic dopamine system and local ORX neurons. Integration within the ORX-MCH-LepR microcircuit is suggested by anatomical and behavioural data, but requires clarification with direct assays of functional connectivity. Further studies of how LH circuits counteract evolutionarily-relevant environmental fluctuations will provide key information about the logic and fragilities of brain controllers of healthy homeostasis.
    Physiology & Behavior 04/2013; DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.03.023 · 3.03 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Diabetes 03/2012; 61(3):564-5. DOI:10.2337/db11-1846 · 8.47 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze the effectiveness of bariatric surgery for hypothalamic obesity in patients with craniopharyngioma (CP). PATIENTS: Patients who developed morbid obesity after surgery for CP and who underwent laparoscopic gastric banding (LAGB), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass were included (n=9). Patients with common obesity who underwent bariatric surgery served as controls (LAGB n=40, sleeve gastrectomy n=49, and gastric bypass n=54). RESULTS: CP was diagnosed during childhood or adolescence (median [range] 10 [1-21] years) and age at bariatric surgery was 17 [12-30] years. Six patients underwent gastric banding (median follow-up 5.5 years (range 1-9)), 4 had a sleeve gastrectomy (median follow-up 2 [0.4-4] years) and two patients had gastric bypass surgery (median follow up 3 years). Three patients had more than one type of bariatric surgery. Different from controls, no weight loss was observed after LAGB or sleeve gastrectomy. The two patients who had gastric bypass surgery lost body weight comparable to controls. CONCLUSION: With LAGB and sleeve gastrectomy, no significant loss of body weight was achieved in young adult patients with craniopharyngioma associated morbid obesity. © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
    Clinical Endocrinology 04/2012; 78(3). DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2012.04409.x · 3.35 Impact Factor