Titanium dioxide nanoparticles induced cytotoxicity, oxidative stress and DNA damage in human amnion epithelial (WISH) cells

Department of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Toxicology in Vitro (Impact Factor: 2.9). 12/2011; 26(2):351-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2011.12.011
Source: PubMed


Titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO(2)-NPs) induced cytotoxicity and DNA damage have been investigated using human amnion epithelial (WISH) cells, as an in vitro model for nanotoxicity assessment. Crystalline, polyhedral rutile TiO(2)-NPs were synthesized and characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), UV-Visible spectroscopy, Fourier transform infra red (FTIR) spectroscopy, and transmission electron microscopic (TEM) analyses. The neutral red uptake (NRU) and [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] (MTT) assays revealed the concentration dependent cytotoxic effects of TiO(2)-NPs (30.6nm) in concentration range of 0.625-10μg/ml. Cells exposed to TiO(2)-NPs (10μg/ml) exhibited significant reduction (46.3% and 34.6%; p<0.05) in catalase activity and glutathione (GSH) level, respectively. Treated cells showed 1.87-fold increase in intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and 7.3% (p<0.01) increase in G(2)/M cell cycle arrest, as compared to the untreated control. TiO(2)-NPs treated cells also demonstrated the formation of DNA double strand breaks with 14.6-fold (p<0.05) increase in Olive tail moment (OTM) value at 20μg/ml concentration, vis-à-vis untreated control, under neutral comet assay conditions. Thus, the reduction in cell viability, morphological alterations, compromised antioxidant system, intracellular ROS production, and significant DNA damage in TiO(2)-NPs exposed cells signify the potential of these NPs to induce cyto- and genotoxicity in cultured WISH cells.

Download full-text


Available from: Quaiser Saquib, Oct 07, 2015
181 Reads
  • Source
    • "Although nanosilver was initially perceived to be rather harmless to human health, recent studies (Asare et al., 2012; Foldbjerg, Dang, & Autrup, 2011; Hussain et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2009) have provided convincing evidence of toxicity associated with exposure to nanosilver. More detailed information about the potential adverse effects of various ENMs has been provided by several researchers (Arora et al., 2012; Holgate, 2010; Horie & Fujita, 2011; Jeng & Swanson, 2006; Magrez et al., 2006; Saquib et al., 2012; Sharifi et al., 2012; Wani, Hashim, Nabi, & Malik, 2011). A toxicological endpoint is the measure of the toxic effect of a substance on human health or the environment, and it determines the harmfulness of a substance. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is increasing recognition that some nanomaterials may pose a risk to human health and the environment. Moreover, the industrial use of the novel engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) increases at a higher rate than data generation for hazard assessment; consequently, many of them remain untested. The large number of nanomaterials and their variants (e.g., different sizes and coatings) requiring testing and the ethical pressure towards nonanimal testing means that in a first instance, expensive animal bioassays are precluded, and the use of (quantitative) structure–activity relationships ((Q)SARs) models as an alternative source of (screening) hazard information should be explored. (Q)SAR modelling can be applied to contribute towards filling important knowledge gaps by making best use of existing data, prioritizing the physicochemical parameters driving toxicity, and providing practical solutions for the risk assessment problems caused by the diversity of ENMs. This paper covers the core components required for successful application of (Q)SAR methods to ENM toxicity prediction, summarizes the published nano-(Q)SAR studies, and outlines the challenges ahead for nano-(Q)SAR modelling. It provides a critical review of (1) the present availability of ENM characterization/toxicity data, (2) the characterization of nanostructures that meet the requirements for (Q)SAR analysis, (3) published nano-(Q)SAR studies and their limitations, (4) in silico tools for (Q)SAR screening of nanotoxicity, and (5) prospective directions for the development of nano-(Q)SAR models.
    Particuology 06/2015; 21:1-19. DOI:10.1016/j.partic.2014.12.001 · 2.11 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Wu et al. (2010) demonstrated that Fe 3 O 4 NPs penetrate human umbilical vein endothelial cells through endocytosis and contribute to cytoskeletal structure damage that leads to apoptosis. In addition, chronic and/or acute exposure to nanoparticles triggers the intracellular redox system through the expression of genes or transcription factors that can be directly implicated in DNA repair failure, proliferation arrest, and inflammatory response (Ahamed et al., 2010; Berlo et al., 2010; Gou et al., 2010; Saquib et al., 2012; Athinarayanan et al., 2014). Additionally , agglomeration or aggregation would be expected to affect nanotoxicity because it changes the size, surface area, and shape of the nanoparticles. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The use of engineered nanoparticles (NPs) across multiple fields and applications has rapidly increased over the last decade owing to their unusual properties. However, there is an increased need in understanding their toxicological effect on human health. Particularly, iron oxide (Fe3O4) have been used in various sectors, including biomedical, food, and agriculture, but the current understanding of their impact on human health is inadequate. In this investigation, we assessed the toxic effect of Fe3O4 NPs on human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) adopting cell viability, cellular morphological changes, mitochondrial transmembrane potential, and cell-cycle progression assessment methodologies. Furthermore, the expression of oxidative stress, cell death, and cell-cycle regulatory genes was assessed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The Fe3O4 NPs induced cytotoxicity and nuclear morphological changes in hMSCs by dose and time exposure. Cell-cycle analysis indicated that Fe3O4 NPs altered the cell-cycle progression through a decrease in the proportion of cells in the G0–G1 phase. The hMSC mitochondrial membrane potential loss increased with an increase in the concentration of Fe3O4 NPs exposure. The observed expression levels of the CYP1A, TNF3, TNFSF10, E2F1, and CCNC genes were significantly upregulated in hMSCs in response to Fe3O4 NPs exposure. Our findings suggest that Fe3O4 NPs caused metabolic stress through altered cell cycle, oxidative stress, and cell death regulatory gene expression in hMSCs. The results of this investigation revealed that Fe3O4 NPs exhibited moderate toxicity on hMSCs and that Fe3O4 NPs may have biomedical applications at low concentrations. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Environ Toxicol, 2014.
    Environmental Toxicology 12/2014; DOI:10.1002/tox.22098 · 3.20 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "In the human lung cancer (A549) cell line strand breaks and DNA oxidative lesions, together with a impair cell ability to repair DNA by inactivation of both NER and BER pathways were reported (Jugan et al., 2012), in addition to oxidative stress, apoptosis and micronuclei induction (Srivastava et al., 2013). Furthermore, positive results in the comet assay in human amnion epithelial (WISH) cells have also been obtained (Saquib et al., 2012). A recent Contents lists available at ScienceDirect journal homepage: "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The in vitro genotoxic and the soft-agar anchorage independent cell transformation ability of titanium dioxide nanoparticles (nano-TiO2) and its microparticulated form has been evaluated in human embryonic kidney (HEK293) and in mouse embryonic fibroblast (NIH/3T3) cells. Nano-TiO2 of two different sizes (21 and 50 nm) were used in this study. The comet assay, with and without the use of FPG enzyme, the micronucleus assay and the soft-agar colony assay were used. For both the comet assay and the frequency of micronuclei a statistically significant induction of DNA damage, was observed at the highest dose tested (1000 µg/mL). No oxidative DNA damage induction was observed when the comet assay was complemented with the use of FPG enzyme. Furthermore, long-term exposure to nano-TiO2 has also proved to induce cell-transformation promoting cell-anchorage independent growth in soft-agar. Results were similar for the two nano-TiO2 sizes. Negative results were obtained when the microparticulated form of TiO2 was tested, indicating the existence of important differences between the microparticulated and nanoparticulated forms. As a conclusion it should be indicated that the observed genotoxic/tranforming effects were only detected at the higher dose tested (1000 µg/mL) what play down the real risk of environmental exposures to this nanomaterial.
    Environmental Research 11/2014; 136. DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2014.10.032 · 4.37 Impact Factor
Show more