Relativistic collapse and explosion of rotating supermassive stars with thermonuclear effects

The Astrophysical Journal (Impact Factor: 5.99). 08/2011; 749(1). DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/749/1/37
Source: arXiv


We present results of general relativistic simulations of collapsing
supermassive stars with and without rotation using the two-dimensional general
relativistic numerical code Nada, which solves the Einstein equations written
in the BSSN formalism and the general relativistic hydrodynamics equations with
high resolution shock capturing schemes. These numerical simulations use an
equation of state which includes effects of gas pressure, and in a tabulated
form those associated with radiation and the electron-positron pairs. We also
take into account the effect of thermonuclear energy released by hydrogen and
helium burning. We find that objects with a mass of 5x10^{5} solar mass and an
initial metallicity greater than Z_{CNO}~0.007 do explode if non-rotating,
while the threshold metallicity for an explosion is reduced to Z_{CNO}~0.001
for objects uniformly rotating. The critical initial metallicity for a
thermonuclear explosion increases for stars with mass ~10^{6} solar mass. For
those stars that do not explode we follow the evolution beyond the phase of
black hole formation. We compute the neutrino energy loss rates due to several
processes that may be relevant during the gravitational collapse of these
objects. The peak luminosities of neutrinos and antineutrinos of all flavors
for models collapsing to a BH are ~10^{55} erg/s. The total radiated energy in
neutrinos varies between ~10^{56} ergs for models collapsing to a BH, and
~10^{45}-10^{46} ergs for models exploding.

Download full-text


Available from: Pedro J. Montero, Mar 12, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The collapse of baryons into extremely massive stars with masses exceeding 10^4 M_Sun in a small fraction of protogalaxies at z > 10 is a promising candidate for the origin of supermassive black holes, some of which grow to a billion solar masses by z ~ 7. We determine the maximum masses such stars can attain by accreting primordial gas. We find that at relatively low accretion rates the strong ionizing radiation of these stars limits their masses to M_* ~ 10^3 M_Sun (dM_acc/dt / 10^-3 M_Sun yr^-1)^8/7, where dM_acc/dt is the rate at which the star gains mass. However, at the higher central infall rates usually found in numerical simulations of protogalactic collapse (>~ 0.1 M_Sun yr^-1), the lifetime of the star instead limits its final mass to >~ 10^6 M_Sun. Furthermore, for the spherical accretion rates at which the star can grow, its ionizing radiation is confined deep within the protogalaxy, so the evolution of the star is decoupled from that of its host galaxy. Lyman alpha emission from the surrounding H II region is trapped in these heavy accretion flows and likely reprocessed into strong Balmer series emission, which may be observable by the James Webb Space Telescope. This, along with strong He II 1640 Angstrom and continuum emission, are likely to be the key observational signatures of the progenitors of supermassive black holes at high redshift.
    The Astrophysical Journal 12/2011; 750(1). DOI:10.1088/0004-637X/750/1/66 · 5.99 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent observations of quasars powered by supermassive black holes (SMBHs) out to z > 7 constrain both the initial seed masses and the growth of the most massive black holes (BHs) in the early universe. Here we elucidate the implications of the radiative feedback from early generations of stars and from BH accretion for popular models for the formation and growth of seed BHs. We show that by properly accounting for (1) the limited role of mergers in growing seed BHs as inferred from cosmological simulations of early star formation and radiative feedback, (2) the sub-Eddington accretion rates of BHs expected at the earliest times, and (3) the large radiative efficiencies (e_rad) of the most massive BHs inferred from observations of active galactic nuclei at high redshift (e_rad > 0.1), we are led to the conclusion that the initial BH seeds may have been as massive as > 10^5 M_Sun. This presents a strong challenge to the Population III seed model, which calls for seed masses of ~ 100 M_Sun and, even with constant Eddington-limited accretion, requires e_rad < 0.09 to explain the highest-z SMBHs in today's standard LambdaCDM cosmological model. It is, however, consistent with the prediction of the direct collapse scenario of SMBH seed formation, in which a supermassive primordial star forms in a region of the universe with a high molecule-dissociating background radiation field, and collapses directly into a 10^4--10^6 M_Sun seed BH. These results corroborate recent cosmological simulations and observational campaigns which suggest that these massive BHs were the seeds of a large fraction of the SMBHs residing in the centers of galaxies today.
    The Astrophysical Journal 11/2012; 771(2). DOI:10.1088/0004-637X/771/2/116 · 5.99 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The existence of supermassive black holes as early as z ~ 7 is one of the great unsolved problems in cosmological structure formation. One leading theory argues that they are born during catastrophic baryon collapse in z ~ 15 protogalaxies in strong Lyman-Werner UV backgrounds. Atomic line cooling in such galaxies fragments baryons into massive clumps that are thought to directly collapse to 10^4 - 10^5 solar-mass black holes. We have now discovered that some of these fragments can instead become supermassive stars that eventually explode as pair-instability supernovae with energies of ~ 10^55 erg, the most energetic explosions in the universe. We have calculated light curves and spectra for supermassive Pop III PI SNe with the Los Alamos RAGE and SPECTRUM codes. We find that they will be visible in NIR all-sky surveys by Euclid out to z ~ 10 - 15 and by WFIRST and WISH out to z ~ 15 - 20, perhaps revealing the birthplaces of the first quasars.
    The Astrophysical Journal 11/2012; 778(1). DOI:10.1088/0004-637X/778/1/17 · 5.99 Impact Factor
Show more