Quality of Early Maternal-Child Relationship and Risk of Adolescent Obesity

Division of Epidemiology, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
PEDIATRICS (Impact Factor: 5.3). 12/2011; 129(1):132-40. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2011-0972
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The goal of this study was to determine whether obesity in adolescence is related to the quality of the early maternal-child relationship.
We analyzed data from 977 of 1364 participants in the Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development. Child attachment security and maternal sensitivity were assessed by observing mother-child interaction at 15, 24, and 36 months of age. A maternal-child relationship quality score was constructed as the number of times across the 3 ages that the child was either insecurely attached or experienced low maternal sensitivity. Adolescent obesity was defined as a measured BMI ≥95th percentile at age 15 years.
Poor-quality maternal-child relationships (score: ≥3) were experienced by 24.7% of children compared with 22.0% who, at all 3 ages, were neither insecurely attached nor exposed to low maternal sensitivity (score: 0). The prevalence of adolescent obesity was 26.1%, 15.5%, 12.1%, and 13.0% for those with risk scores of ≥3, 2, 1, and 0, respectively. After adjustment for gender and birth weight, the odds (95% confidence interval) of adolescent obesity was 2.45 (1.49-4.04) times higher in those with the poorest quality early maternal-child relationships (score: ≥3) compared with those with the highest quality (score: 0). Low maternal sensitivity was more strongly associated with obesity than insecure attachment.
Poor quality of the early maternal-child relationship was associated with a higher prevalence of adolescent obesity. Interventions aimed at improving the quality of maternal-child interactions should consider assessing effects on children's weight and examining potential mechanisms involving stress response and emotion regulation.

  • Source
    • "ilar trends have been corroborated by Anderson and Whitaker ( 2011 ) , who found that the probability of a 4½ year old child becoming obese is 1 . 3 times higher within an insecure mother – child attachment than within a secure attach - ment ( measured when the child was 24 months old ) . This tendency remains until the child reaches adolescence ( Anderson et al . , 2012 ) . Thus , the significance of the mother as a secure base for the long - term weight development of the child should be emphasized . Our results also revealed that the attachment effect shows incremental validity beyond biological / genetic and environmental factors such as the child ' s birth BMI percentile , parental BMI , and mother"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Childhood obesity has become a rising health problem, and because parental obesity is a basic risk factor for childhood obesity, biological factors have been especially considered in the complex etiology. Aspects of the family interaction, e.g., mother–child attachment, have not been the main focus. Our study tried to fill this gap by investigating whether there is a difference between children of obese and normal weight mothers in terms of mother–child attachment, and whether mother–child attachment predicts child’s weight, in a sample of 31 obese and 31 normal weight mothers with children aged 19 to 58 months. Mother–child attachment was measured with the Attachment Q-Set. We found that (1) children of obese mothers showed a lower quality of mother–child attachment than children of normal weight mothers, which indicates that they are less likely to use their mothers as a secure base; (2) the attachment quality predicted child`s BMI percentile; and (3) the mother–child attachment adds incremental validity to the prediction of child’s BMI beyond biological parameters (child’s BMI birth percentile, BMI of the parents) and mother’s relationship status. Implications of our findings are discussed.
    Attachment & Human Development 07/2015; DOI:10.1080/14616734.2015.1067823 · 2.38 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Similar findings emerged when insecure and disorganized attachment styles were combined and compared with the secure attachment style. In a later study, the observed poor quality of the early mother–child attachment relationship was also associated with a higher prevalence of obesity in adolescence (Anderson et al., 2012). Only two studies have focused on the quality of parental attachment and the risk of childhood obesity. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Within the research area on the determinants of childhood obesity, a relatively new approach is the use of attachment theory to explore the mechanisms underlying children's obesity risk, especially considered as emotion regulation strategies in parent-child relationship. Few are the empirical researches that have addressed this issue. The empirical investigations have used self-report measures to assess adult attachment. In attachment studies, the use of interview methods and/or performance-based instruments is advised to evaluate the entire range of possible adult attachment patterns and comprehensively explain the emotional strategies, correlates, and consequences of individual differences in attachment system functioning. The aim of this study was to explore the extent to which both parents' attachment patterns serve as self-regulative mechanisms related to childhood overweight/obesity by the Adult Attachment Projective Picture System (AAP) in a sample of 44 mothers and fathers of children referred for obesity. Insecure attachment was found as a risk factor both for mothers and fathers. Also unresolved/disorganization was found to play a significant role in childhood obesity. The role of father's attachment was explored and findings suggested considering it in etiology and treatment of childhood obesity.
    Frontiers in Psychology 07/2014; 5:791. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00791 · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Temperament may predispose individuals to certain behavioral patterns, but outcomes also depend on environmental contexts, such as the microlevel parenting environment. An emerging literature demonstrates links between parenting and obesity (Anderson et al. 2012; Brotman et al. 2012; Rhee et al. 2006; Wake et al. 2007), with evidence that temperament and parenting interact to predict child weight outcomes (Sleddens et al. 2011; Wu et al. 2011). For example, Wu et al. (2011) found that infants who were high on negativity and who also experienced insensitive parenting had an increased risk of obesity during childhood. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A consideration of potential moderators can highlight intervention effects that are attenuated when investigating aggregate results. Differential susceptibility is one type of interaction, where susceptible individuals have poorer outcomes in negative environments and better outcomes in positive environments, compared to less susceptible individuals, who have moderate outcomes regardless of environment. In the current study, we provide rationale for investigating this type of interaction in the context of a behavioral childhood obesity preventive intervention and test whether infant negativity moderated intervention effects on infant self-regulation and weight gain and on two aspects of mothers' parenting competence: parenting self-efficacy and parenting satisfaction. Results showed that infants' negative temperament at 3 weeks moderated intervention effects on some, but not all, outcomes. The intervention led to greater parenting satisfaction in mothers with highly negative infants but did not affect parenting satisfaction in mothers with less negative infants, consistent with a model of differential susceptibility. There was also a trend toward less weight gain in highly negative intervention group infants. In contrast, there was a main effect of the intervention on infant self-regulation at 1 year, such that the intervention group had higher observed self-regulation, across levels of infant negativity. Results support the importance of incorporating tests of moderation into evaluations of obesity interventions and also illustrate that individuals may be differentially susceptible to environmental effects on some outcomes but not others.
    Prevention Science 07/2013; 15(5). DOI:10.1007/s11121-013-0408-4 · 2.63 Impact Factor
Show more


Available from