Article

Dissection of unsuspicious para-aortic lymph nodes does not improve prognosis of advanced endometrial carcinoma with intra- or extra-abdominal metastasis.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Anticancer research (impact factor: 1.73). 12/2011; 31(12):4513-7. pp.4513-7
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to analyze the significance of dissection of unsuspicious para-aortic lymph nodes (PAN) in patients with advanced endometrial carcinomas with intra- or extra-abdominal metastasis.
We conducted a retrospective comparison of the results of PAN dissection versus non-dissection for endometrial carcinomas with macroscopic metastatic lesions beyond the uterus (without significant swelling of the regional lymph nodes, including PAN), whose lesions were completely resected.
Disease-free survival and overall survival did not exhibit a significant difference between the two groups. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that PAN dissection was not an independent prognostic factor for survival. The frequency of PAN involvement at the first recurrence did not differ between the two groups.
For advanced endometrial carcinomas with macroscopic metastatic lesions beyond the uterus, without significant swelling of regional lymph nodes, PAN dissection may be omitted without a significant adverse effect on prognosis and survival.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
54 Views

Keywords

dissection
 
endometrial carcinomas
 
extra-abdominal metastasis
 
first recurrence
 
independent prognostic factor
 
intra-
 
lesions
 
macroscopic metastatic lesions
 
Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis
 
non-dissection
 
PAN dissection
 
PAN involvement
 
patients
 
retrospective comparison
 
significant adverse effect
 
two groups
 
unsuspicious para-aortic lymph nodes
 
uterus