Animal model of intramedullary spinal cord glioma using human glioblastoma multiforme neurospheres. Laboratory investigation

Department of Neurosurgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine (Impact Factor: 2.38). 12/2011; 16(3):315-9. DOI: 10.3171/2011.11.SPINE11492
Source: PubMed


Advances in the diagnosis and management of patients with spinal cord tumors have been limited because of the rarity of the disease and the limitations of current animal models for spinal cord glioma. The ideal spinal cord tumor model would possess a number of characteristics, including the use of human glioma cells that capture the growth pattern and local invasive nature of their human counterpart. In this study, the authors' goal was to develop a novel spinal cord tumor model using a human neurosphere cell line.
Eighteen female athymic rats were randomized into 3 experimental groups. Animals in the first group (6 rats) received a 3-ml intramedullary injection containing DMEM and were used as controls. Animals in the second group (6 rats) received a 3-ml intramedullary injection containing 100,000 glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) neurosphere cells in 3 ml DMEM. Animals in the third group (6 rats) received a 3-ml intramedullary injection containing 9L gliosarcoma cells in 3 ml DMEM. Functional testing of hindlimb strength was assessed using the Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan (BBB) scale. Once the functional BBB score of an animal was less than or equal to 5 (slight movement of 2 joints and extensive movement of the third), euthanasia was performed.
Animals in the GBM neurosphere group had a mean survival of 33.3 ± 2.0 days, which was approximately twice as long as animals in the 9L gliosarcoma group (16.3 ± 2.3 days). There was a significant difference between survival of the GBM neurosphere and 9L gliosarcoma groups (p < 0.001). None of the control animals died (p < 0.001 for GBM neurosphere group vs controls and 9L vs controls). Histopathological examination of the rats injected with 9L gliosarcoma revealed that all animals developed highly cellular, well-circumscribed lesions causing compression of the surrounding tissue, with minimal invasion of the surrounding gray and white matter. Histopathological examination of animals injected with GBM neurospheres revealed that all animals developed infiltrative lesions with a high degree of white and gray matter invasion along with areas of necrosis.
The authors have established a novel animal model of spinal cord glioma using neurospheres derived from human GBM. When injected into the spinal cords of athymic nude rats, neurospheres gave rise to infiltrative, actively proliferating tumors that were histologically identical to spinal cord glioma in humans. On the basis of their results, the authors conclude that this is a reproducible animal model of high-grade spinal cord glioma based on a human GBM neurosphere line. This model represents an improvement over other models using nonhuman glioma cell lines. Novel therapeutic strategies can be readily evaluated using this model.

37 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Opinion statement: Intramedullary spinal cord tumors are rare central nervous system tumors with unique challenges due to the eloquence of the surrounding tissue. Their treatment and prognosis is largely dependent on tumor histology and patient functionality. The introduction and advancement of microsurgical techniques have made surgery the mainstay of treatment for intramedullary tumors. Tumors that are well demarcated (e.g., ependymomas, hemangioblastomas) can be resected for cure, while more infiltrative tumors (e.g., high-grade astrocytomas) are typically managed with biopsies or limited resections in order to minimize the significant risk of damage to the spinal cord. The use of more aggressive surgical resection for astrocytoma is controversial but may have an increasing role in select cases. The use of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring and intraoperative ultrasound may help guide the extent of surgery while minimizing damage to normal tissue. Advances in MRI technology have greatly aided the diagnosis and preoperative planning of intramedullary tumors. Further advances in intraoperative MRI may make this a useful tool in guiding extent of resection. Preoperative functional status is the most important predictor of neurologic outcome, while histology and extent of resection are the most important predictors of progression-free survival. The use of adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy is dependent on patient age and histology but is largely reserved for high-grade tumor histologies or systemic involvement. Children are particularly at risk of radiation-induced injury, and these cases may benefit from more focused stereotactic radiation where necessary. Further studies are needed to support new surgical strategies minimizing destabilization and to investigate new forms of adjuvant therapy to minimize toxicity.
    Current Treatment Options in Oncology 08/2015; 16(8):358. DOI:10.1007/s11864-015-0358-0 · 3.24 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Intramedullary spinal cord tumors have low incidence rates but are associated with difficult treatment options. The majority of patients with these tumors can be initially treated with an attempted resection. Unfortunately, those patients who cannot undergo gross-total resection or have subtotal resection are left with few treatment options, such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy. These adjuvant treatments, however, are associated with the potential for significant adverse side effects and still leave patients with a poor prognosis. To successfully manage these patients and improve both their quality of life and prognosis, novel treatment options must be developed to supplement subtotal resection. New research is underway investigating alternative therapeutic approaches for these patients, including directed, localized drug delivery and nanomedicine techniques. These and other future investigations will hopefully lead to promising new therapies for these devastating diseases.
    Neurosurgical FOCUS 08/2015; 39(2):E14. DOI:10.3171/2015.5.FOCUS15158 · 2.11 Impact Factor