Studying the vendor perspective on clinical decision support.

Joan S Ash, Dean F Sittig, Carmit K McMullen, James L McCormack, Adam Wright, Arwen Bunce, Joseph Wasserman, Vishnu Mohan, Deborah J Cohen, Michael Shapiro, Blackford Middleton

Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Journal Article: AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium 01/2011; 2011:80-7.

Abstract

In prior work, using a Rapid Assessment Process (RAP), we have investigated clinical decision support (CDS) in ambulatory clinics and hospitals. We realized that individuals in these settings provide only one perspective related to the CDS landscape, which also includes content vendors and electronic health record (EHR) vendors. To discover content vendors' perspectives and their perceived challenges, we modified RAP for industrial settings. We describe how we employed RAP, and show its utility by describing two illustrative themes. We found that while the content vendors believe they provide unique much-needed services, the amount of labor involved in content development is underestimated by others. We also found that the content vendors believe their products are resources to be used by practitioners, so they are somewhat protected from liability issues. To promote adequate understanding about these issues, we recommend a "three way conversation" among content vendors, EHR vendors, and user organizations.

Source: PubMed

Comments on this publication

ResearchGate members can add comments. Sign up now and post your comment!

Similar publications

Science & Research Jobs

Keywords

adequate understanding
 
ambulatory clinics
 
CDS
 
CDS landscape
 
clinical decision support
 
electronic health record
 
includes content vendors
 
labor
 
others
 
perceived challenges
 
prior work
 
Rapid Assessment Process
 
unique much-needed services
 
user organizations
 
way conversation