Article

E-health use, vaccination knowledge and perception of own risk: Drivers of vaccination uptake in medical students

Center for Empirical Research in Economics andBehavioral Sciences, University of Erfurt, Germany.
Vaccine (Impact Factor: 3.49). 12/2011; 30(6):1143-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.021
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT was to improve understanding of mechanisms contributing to healthcare personnel's (HCP) reluctance to get vaccinated against seasonal influenza. We assessed the role of several drivers: vaccination knowledge, vaccination recommendations and the role of the Internet (so-called e-health) in creating vaccination knowledge. The key mechanism under consideration was the perceived own risk (regarding disease and the vaccine).
310 medical students at the Frankfurt University Hospital answered an anonymous questionnaire assessing risk perceptions, intentions to get vaccinated, knowledge, preferences regarding information sources for personal health decisions and search-terms that they would use in a Google-search directed at seasonal influenza vaccination.
The key driver of vaccination intentions was the perceived own risk (of contracting influenza and of suffering from vaccine adverse events). The recommendation to get vaccinated was a significant, yet weaker predictor. As an indirect driver we identified one's knowledge concerning vaccination. 32% of the knowledge questions were answered incorrectly or as don't know. 64% of the students were e-health users; therefore, additional information search via the Internet was likely. An analysis of the websites obtained by googling the search-terms provided by the students revealed 30% commercial e-health websites, 11% anti-vaccination websites and 10% public health websites. Explicit searches for vaccination risks led to fewer public health websites than searches without risk as a search term. Content analysis of the first three websites obtained revealed correct information regarding the questions of whether the doses of vaccine additives were dangerous, whether chronic diseases are triggered by vaccines and whether vaccines promote allergies in 58%, 53% and 34% of the websites, respectively. These questions were especially related to own risk, which strongly predicted intentions. Correct information on vaccination recommendations were provided on 85% of the websites.
Concentrating on the key drivers in early medical education (own risk of contracting influenza, vaccine safety, vaccination recommendation) promises to be a successful combination to increase vaccination uptake in HCP.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
171 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: On December 3–4 2012, the World Health Organization convened a meeting of influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) experts from over 25 countries in Geneva, Switzerland, to review recent developments in the global influenza vaccine landscape and evaluate approaches to determining the effectiveness of influenza vaccine products among target populations. Vaccine manufacturers from Thailand, Vietnam, India, and Brazil shared recent advances illustrating the expansion of influenza vaccine production worldwide. Randomized controlled trials are underway in several low and middle-income countries including India, Thailand, Bangladesh, and South Africa, to fill knowledge gaps in target populations such as children and pregnant women. National and international networks in the United States, Canada, Europe, Latin America and Australia are conducting multi-site observational studies with shared methodologies to generate national influenza VE estimates and pool data for regional estimates. Standardized VE estimation methods are key to generating point estimates that are comparable internationally and across different settings.
    Vaccine 10/2014; 32(49). DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.09.069 · 3.49 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Vaccination of healthcare students is important to protect them from acquiring and transmitting vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs) to high-risk patients and other healthcare workers (HCWs). The aim of the current study was to estimate the vaccination coverage, the susceptibility against VPDs, the knowledge and attitudes toward vaccinations of healthcare students studying at the Athens Technological Educational Institute.
    Vaccine 06/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.06.031 · 3.49 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Die weltweite Elimination der Masern ist erklärtes Ziel der Weltgesundheitsorganisation (WHO). Als eine der kritischen Herausforderungen für das Erreichen dieses Zieles benennt die WHO für Länder wie Deutschland das ,,Management von Wahrnehmungen und Fehlwahrnehmungen“ (,,perceptions and misperceptions“): Impfkritik und Falschwissen sind beispielsweise im Internet leicht verfügbar und schüren Fehlwahrnehmungen, Vorbehalte und Ängste gegenüber Impfungen. Hingegen kennt kaum noch jemand das Erscheinungsbild der Masern, da diese durch den Erfolg der Impfungen selten auftreten. Masern werden dadurch häufig fälschlicherweise für eine harmlose Kinderkrankheit gehalten. Die Aufklärung über Infektions- und Impfrisiken – verbunden mit der erfolgreichen Entkräftung von Impfkritik – sollte daher ein effektives Management von Wahrnehmungen und Fehlwahrnehmungen bestimmen.Ziel des vorliegenden Beitrags ist es, hierfür konkrete Hinweise zur Diskussion zu stellen. Dabei soll der janusköpfigen Rolle des Internets Rechnung getragen werden: zum einen als Quelle von impfgegnerischen Falschinformationen und den daraus folgenden Fehlwahrnehmungen. Zum anderen wird das Internet als ideales Mittel zur Aufklärung und Korrektur von kursierendem Falschwissen diskutiert, da auch Gesundheitsorganisationen es zunehmend als Informationsplattform nutzen.Der vorliegende Beitrag macht Vorschläge, wie ein effektives Management auf verschiedenen Ebenen der Informationsanbieter machbar sein könnte und wie das Internet aktiv dafür eingesetzt werden kann. Eine kommentierte Linksammlung empfiehlt Internetressourcen für Patienten und Berufstätige im Gesundheitsbereich.
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz 01/2013; 56(9). DOI:10.1007/s00103-013-1793-3 · 1.01 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
240 Downloads
Available from
Jun 1, 2014