Article

Results of pancreas transplantation alone with special attention to native kidney function and proteinuria in type 1 diabetes patients.

Division of General and Transplant Surgery in Uremic and Diabetic Patients, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
The Review of Diabetic Studies 01/2011; 8(2):259-67. DOI: 10.1900/RDS.2011.8.259
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We report on our single-center experience with pancreas transplantation alone (PTA) in 71 patients with type 1 diabetes, and a 4-year follow-up. Portal insulin delivery was used in 73.2% of cases and enteric drainage of exocrine secretion in 100%. Immunosuppression consisted of basiliximab (76%), or thymoglobulin (24%), followed by mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and low-dose steroids. Actuarial patient and pancreas survival at 4 years were 98.4% and 76.7%, respectively. Relaparatomy was needed in 18.3% of patients. Restored endogenous insulin secretion resulted in sustained normalization of fasting plasma glucose levels and HbA1c concentration in all technically successful transplantations. Protenuria (24-hour) improved significantly after PTA. Renal function declined only in recipients with pretransplant glomerular filtration rate (GFR) greater than 90 ml/min, possibly as a result of correction of hyperfiltration following normalization of glucose metabolism. Further improvements were recorded in several cardiovascular risk factors, retinopathy, and neuropathy. We conclude that PTA was an effective and reasonably safe procedure in this single-center experience.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Fabio Vistoli, Jan 07, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
131 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Efforts involving therapeutic islet cell transplantation have been hampered by limited islet availability and immune rejection. In vitro transdifferentiation of human bone marrow-derived stem (hBMDS) cells into functional insulin-producing cells promises to provide a tissue source for autologous cell transplantation. In this study, we isolated hBMDS cells, developed a single-cell-derived stem cell line, and induced the cells to differentiate into islet-like clusters. These islet-like cells expressed multiple genes related to islet development and beta cell function (e.g., Pdx-1, Ngn-3, Islet-1, Neuro-D, Pax4, IAPP, and insulin) and produced insulin and C-peptide within these cells. These islet-like cells demonstrated time-dependent glucose-stimulated insulin release, and the ability to ameliorate hyperglycemia in chemically induced diabetic mice. However, these transplanted differentiated cells became tumorigenic in diabetic immunocompromised mice and their spontaneous transformation was confirmed by a marked increase in growth rate and inactivation of tumor suppressor genes (P21 and P16) by promoter hypermethylation. In conclusion, while hBMDS cells can be transdifferentiated into competent insulin-producing cells, and while such cell might be a potential source for autologous cell therapy for type 1 diabetes, caution is strongly advised in view of the neoplastic propensity of hBMDS cells, especially after a long-term culture in vitro.
    06/2012; 1(2):114-127.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pancreas transplantation consistently induces insulin-independence in beta-cell-penic diabetic patients, but at the cost of major surgery and life-long immunosuppression. One year after grafting, patient survival rate now exceeds 95 % across recipient categories, while insulin independence is maintained in some 85 % of simultaneous pancreas and kidney recipients and in nearly 80 % of solitary pancreas transplant recipients. The half-life of the pancreas graft currently averages 16.7 years, being the longest among extrarenal grafts, and substantially matching the one of renal grafts from deceased donors. The difference between expected (100 %) and actual insulin-independence rate is mostly explained by technical failure in the postoperative phase, and rejection in the long-term period. Death with a functioning graft remains a further major issue, especially in uremic patients who have undergone prolonged periods of dialysis. Refinements in graft preservation, surgical techniques, immunosuppression, and prophylactic treatments are expected to further improve the results of pancreas transplantation.
    Current Diabetes Reports 07/2012; 12(5):568-79. DOI:10.1007/s11892-012-0293-4 · 3.38 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: Pancreas-kidney transplant is an effective treatment for patients with insulin-dependent dabetes and chronic renal failure. Reduction in technical failure loss and early acute rejection rates contributed to prolong pancreas graft survival. However, drug toxicity affects negatively both short- and long-term follow-ups. Areas covered: This article reviews the existing literature and knowledge of the immunosuppressive drugs that are frequently used in pancreas transplant, including calcineurin inhibitors, sirolimus, corticosteroids, and mycophenolate. The article also discusses the short- and long-term adverse effects of these drugs. The article also reports and discusses the most relevant in vitro studies, providing additional information to in vivo findings. Some clinically relevant drug interactions with immunosuppressive drugs are also highlighted. Over- and underimmunosuppression effects will not be addressed. Expert opinion: Immunosuppressive regimen after pancreas transplant is very effective and contributed to pancreas allograft survival. However, they present several side effects that are potentiated when drugs are combined. Modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors can aggravate metabolic and toxicological effects of immunosuppressive drugs. It is important to critically analyze the results of clinical studies and investigate new immunosuppressive drugs and/or novel drug combinations. It is equally important to comprehend and interpret experimental data. Therefore, minimization of side effects, based on safe approaches, can prolong pancreas allograft survival.
    Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism &amp Toxicology 09/2012; 8(12):1531-1548. DOI:10.1517/17425255.2012.724058 · 2.93 Impact Factor
Show more