Article

Complex Drug Interactions of the HIV Protease Inhibitors 3: Effect of Simultaneous or Staggered Dosing of Digoxin and Ritonavir, Nelfinavir, Rifampin, or Bupropion

Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle,Washington 98195, USA.
Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals (Impact Factor: 3.33). 12/2011; 40(3):610-6. DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.042705
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT As part of a larger clinical drug-drug interaction (DDI) study aimed at in vitro to in vivo prediction of HIV protease inhibitor metabolic and transporter-based DDIs, we measured the inductive (staggered administration) and inductive plus inhibitory (simultaneously administered) effect of multiple dose ritonavir (RTV), nelfinavir (NFV), or rifampin (RIF) on the pharmacokinetics of the P-glycoprotein probe, digoxin (DIG), when administered simultaneously or staggered with the protease inhibitors or RIF. In both cases, NFV did not significantly affect DIG disposition. RTV decreased DIG renal clearance (Cl(renal)) when administered simultaneously or staggered but significantly increased DIG area under the curve from time zero to 24 h (AUC(0-24 h)) only when administered simultaneously. RIF decreased DIG AUC(0-24 h) only when RIF and DIG administration was staggered. When RIF and DIG were administered simultaneously, DIG maximal observed plasma concentration and area under the curve from time zero to 4 h were significantly increased, and DIG Cl(renal) was decreased. An unexpected and potentially clinically significant DDI was observed between DIG and the CYP2B6 probe, bupropion, which decreased DIG AUC(0-24 h) 1.6-fold and increased Cl(renal) 1.8-fold. Because this was an unexpected DDI and our studies were not specifically designed to quantify this interaction, further studies are required to confirm the interaction and understand the mechanistic basis of the DDI. In summary, RTV or NFV do not induce P-glycoprotein activity measured with DIG, and RIF does so only under staggered administration.

1 Follower
 · 
99 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Erlotinib, N-(3-ethynylphenyl)-6,7-bis(2-methoxyethoxy) quinazolin-4-amine is approved for the treatment for non-small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer. Because erlotinib is metabolized predominately by CYP3A4, co-administration of compounds that increase CYP3A4 activity may alter the efficacy and safety of erlotinib therapy. Two phase I studies were conducted in healthy male subjects to evaluate the effect of pre- or co-administered rifampicin, a CYP3A4 inducer, on the pharmacokinetics of erlotinib. Study 1 included Groups A (erlotinib 150 mg days 1 and 15, rifampicin 600 mg days 8-14) and B (erlotinib 150 mg days 1 and 15) in a parallel group study design. Study 2 subjects received erlotinib 150 mg day 1, erlotinib 450 mg day 15, and rifampicin 600 mg days 8-18. The primary endpoint in each study was the ratio of exposure (AUC0-∞ and C max) between days 1 and 15. Urinary cortisol metabolic induction ratios were determined in Study 1 for Group A subjects only. In Study 1, the geometric mean ratios of AUC0-∞ and C max were 33 and 71 %, respectively, and the mean cortisol metabolic index increased from 7.4 to 27.0, suggesting cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme induction. In Study 2, the geometric mean ratios for AUC0-∞ and C max were 19 and 34 % (when dose adjusted from 450 to 150 mg erlotinib), respectively, a greater relative decrease than observed in Study 1. Erlotinib exposure (AUC0-∞ and C max) was reduced after pre- or concomitant dosing with rifampicin. Doses of ≥450 mg erlotinib may be necessary to compensate for concomitant medications with strong CYP3A4 enzyme induction effect.
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 01/2014; 73(3). DOI:10.1007/s00280-014-2390-3 · 2.57 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ritonavir, an HIV protease inhibitor, is successfully used for the prevention and treatment of HIV infections. Ritonavir pharmacokinetics are complicated by inhibition, induction and pharmacogenetics of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes mediating its clearance. This investigation revealed that CYP2J2, along with CYP3A4/5 and CYP2D6, efficiently metabolizes ritonavir, and to a CYP2J2-specific (minor) metabolite. Chemical inhibition of ritonavir metabolism, clearance, KI/kinact and abundance of CYP2J2 in liver microsomes were evaluated and then applied to an in vitro-in vivo static scaling model to estimate the contribution of each isozyme, as a function of CYP abundance, activity, and genotype. Disposition of the CYP2J2- specific metabolite was also evaluated in vivo. In plasma, metabolite abundance was well above previously reported levels with circulating concentrations measured at 2μM for the main hydroxylisopropyl metabolite. Ritonavir and metabolite plasma profiles were simulated using Simcyp®. A modest (2-6%) contribution of CYP2J2 to ritonavir clearance is predicted which increases to more than 20% in subjects carrying CYP2D6 poor metabolizer polymorphisms and CYP3A4 irreversible inhibition. These results indicate that minor drug metabolizing enzymes could become quantitatively important in RTV clearance if main metabolic pathways are impeded.
    Biochemical Pharmacology 06/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.bcp.2014.06.020 · 4.65 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: 1. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency have shown decision trees to determine whether a drug candidate is an inhibitor of P-glycoprotein (P-gp). However, there has been no clear information on whether P-gp inhibition can be significant in clinical drug–drug interactions (DDIs). The purpose of this study was to confirm the effect of P-gp inhibition through comprehensive analysis of the clinical DDI studies. 2. Clinical information on P-gp inhibition was collected using the University of Washington Metabolism and Transport Drug Interaction Database™. The risks of P-gp inhibition-related DDI were qualitatively evaluated in terms of the contribution of CYP3A inhibition. The degrees of DDI risk were categorized using the area under the plasma concentration–time curve increase ratio (AUCR), according to the FDA DDI criteria. 3. When both P-gp and CYP3A were inhibited, the DDI risks were potent in 25% of the studies. When CYP3A inhibition did not contribute to the DDI, no study was categorized as potent DDI risk, and the detailed analysis revealed that AUCRs were basically <3.0. The DDI risk caused by P-gp inhibition solely would be limited, although the use of P-gp substrates with narrow therapeutic range should be carefully controlled.
    Xenobiotica 06/2014; DOI:10.3109/00498254.2014.928958 · 2.10 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
37 Downloads
Available from
May 23, 2014