Article

Factors predicting the outcome of conservatively treated adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: an analysis of 166 cases.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Gynecologic Oncology (Impact Factor: 3.93). 12/2011; 124(3):490-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.11.039
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The present study assessed the clinical outcome of patients conservatively treated for cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and their predictive factors using univariate and multivariate population averaged (PA) generalized estimating equation (GEE) model in a longitudinal setting.
A series of 166 consecutive women (mean age 39.8 yrs; range 23-63 yrs) underwent conservative treatment of AIS as the primary treatment and were followed-up (mean 40.9 mo) using colposcopy, PAP-smear, biopsy and HPV-testing with Hybrid Capture 2.
Hysterectomy was performed as part of the primary management in 47 patients, who were excluded from the follow-up (FU) analysis. Out of 119 women closely followed-up, additional therapeutic procedures were performed in 69. At study conclusion, 7 patients (5.9%) showed persistent disease, while 8 (6.7%) had progressed to invasive adenocarcinoma (AC). Positive HR-HPV test was the only independent predictor of disease recurrence (adjusted OR=2.72; 95%CI 1.08-6.87), and together with free cone margins (OR=0.20; 95%CI 0.04-0.92), HR-HPV positivity was also the single most powerful predictor of disease progression to AC, with OR=3.74; 95%CI 1.84-7.61 (p=0.0001) in multivariate PA-GEE.
These results suggest that testing HR-HPV positive at any time point during FU is the most significant independent predictor of progressive disease, while showing free margins in cone has a significant protective effect against progression to AC. Furthermore, because 4.3% women with persistent, recurrent or progressive disease experienced a late (5th and 6th FU) diagnosis of HG-CGIN or microinvasive AC, a close surveillance should be scheduled for at least three years in conservatively treated AIS patients.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
117 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine factors associated with the presence of residual disease in women who have undergone cervical conization for adenocarcinoma in situ (ACIS) of the cervix. We identified women who underwent a cervical conization for a diagnosis of ACIS followed by repeat conization or hysterectomy between January 1, 1995 and April 30, 2010. Data were summarized using standard descriptive statistics. 78 patients met study criteria. The presence of ACIS at the internal conization margin or in the postconization endocervical curettage (ECC) correlated with residual ACIS (p<0.001). A margin positive for ACIS was associated with residual glandular neoplasia in 68% of cases. An ECC positive for ACIS was associated with residual ACIS in 95% of cases. If both the margins and the ECC were positive for the presence of ACIS, 8% did not have residual disease, 77% had residual ACIS and 15% had invasive adenocarcinoma. If both the internal conization margin and the postconization ECC were negative for the presence of ACIS, 14% of the final specimens had residual ACIS and none had invasive cancer. The addition of postconization ECC to cone biopsy for ACIS of the cervix provides valuable prognostic information regarding the risk of residual ACIS. Women with ACIS who have both a negative postconization ECC and a negative conization margin have a 14% risk for residual ACIS and can be treated conservatively if desiring fertility. A positive postconization ECC or internal margin incurs significant risk of residual disease and 12-17% will have cancer.
    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 12/2013; · 3.28 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) is the precursor to adenocarcinoma, and early management will often prevent the occurrence of invasive adenocarcinoma. Conservative treatment with conization has been proposed for the initial treatment for cervical AIS. To evaluate the risk of residual/recurrent disease after conization, we investigated the long-term follow-up results for patients with cervical AIS treated by conization. One hundred thirty-six patients with a biopsy diagnosis of cervical AIS followed by conization were followed up with cytologic, histologic, and human papillomavirus testing. The rate of residual AIS in the following hysterectomy was significantly increased in patients with positive margins on the conization (48.6%, 17/35) compared to patients with negative margins (0/30). No significant disease was identified in patients treated by hysterectomy as primary treatment. More importantly, only 2 patients with conization as primary management had adenocarcinoma or focal AIS, respectively, during a long-term follow-up period (mean, 45 mo). However, one of them had positive margin on the conization and did not proceed to further treatment. The other one had negative margin on the conization but only had focal AIS on the hysterectomy. Human papillomavirus-positive rate showed no significant difference between patients treated by conization and patients treated by hysterectomy during the long-term follow-up. Therefore, if a negative resection margin is achieved, conservative management with conization and careful surveillance is suitable for patients with cervical AIS and desire for future childbearing.
    Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease 07/2013; · 1.21 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) of the uterine cervix is caused by infection with high-risk human papillomavirus and is the recognized precursor of invasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Because most AIS lesions are caused by HPV 16/18 infection, prophylactic HPV vaccination is an important step toward prevention of AIS, potentially reducing the incidence of invasive adenocarcinoma. Nonetheless, at the moment the incidence of AIS and invasive adenocarcinoma continues to increase, especially among young women when fertility preservation is an issue. Both diagnosis and treatment of AIS is challenging, because AIS lesions frequently extend into the endocervical canal, making detection and complete excision difficult. Hysterectomy remains the standard treatment for AIS. Selected patients, who wish to preserve fertility, with clear margins and negative ECC after initial conization are potential candidates for conservative treatment. If margins are involved after initial conization or ECC results are positive, the risk of residual or recurrent AIS and invasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix is considerably high. In these women, repeat surgery should be performed. For women, who do not undergo hysterectomy, long-term follow-up is recommended.
    Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports. 03/2013; 2:86-93.