Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) as an Adjunct for Hemorrhagic Shock
US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, Texas 78236, USA. The Journal of trauma
(Impact Factor: 2.96).
12/2011; 71(6):1869-72. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823fe90c
Figures in this publication
Available from: sciencedirect.com
- "Techniques first learned by trauma surgeons should be placing the sheath to save time once IR specialists arrive, or potentially to obtain balloon catheter occlusion (BCO) of the descending aorta to obviate the morbidity of resuscitative thoracotomy and aortic-clamping [63,68–70]. Focused Endovascular Skills for Trauma and Resuscitative Surgery (ESTARS) courses have been initiated by the Military, and are propagating to civilian universities  . This technique was described for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms as far back as the Korean war  . "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Traumatic injury is the leading cause of potentially preventable lost years of life in the Western world and exsanguination is the most potentially preventable cause of post-traumatic death. With mature trauma systems and experienced trauma centres, extra-abdominal sites, such as the pelvis, constitute the most frequent anatomic site of exsanguination. Haemorrhage control for such bleeding often requires surgical adjuncts most notably interventional radiology (IR). With the usual paradigm of surgery conducted within an operating room and IR procedures within distant angiography suites, responsible clinicians are faced with making difficult decisions regarding where to transport the most physiologically unstable patients for haemorrhage control. If such a critical patient is transported to the wrong suite, they may die unnecessarily despite having potentially salvageable injuries. Thus, it seems only logical that the resuscitative operating room of the future would have IR capabilities making it the obvious geographic destination for critically unstable patients, especially those who are exsanguinating.
Injury 01/2014; 45(9). DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2014.01.021 · 2.14 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of resuscitative endovascular aortic balloon occlusion (REBOA) of the distal aorta in a porcine model of pelvic hemorrhage.
Swine were entered into three phases of study: injury (iliac artery), hemorrhage (45 s), and intervention (180 min). Three groups were studied: no intervention (NI, n = 7), a kaolin-impregnated gauze (Combat Gauze) (CG, n = 7), or REBOA (n = 7). The protocol was repeated with a dilutional coagulopathy (CG-C, n = 7, and REBOA-C, n = 7). Measures of physiology, rates of hemorrhage, and mortality were recorded.
Rate of hemorrhage was greatest in the NI group, followed by the REBOA and CG groups (822 ± 415 mL/min versus 11 ± 13 and 0.2 ± 0.4 mL/min respectively; P < 0.001). MAP following intervention (at 15 min) was the same in the CG and REBOA groups and higher than in the NI group (70 ± 4 and 70 ± 11 mm Hg versus 5 ± 13 mm Hg respectively; P < 0.001). There was 100% mortality in the NI group, with no deaths in the CG or REBOA group. In the setting of coagulopathy, the rate of bleeding was higher in the CG-C versus the REBOA-C group (229 ± 295 mL/min versus 20 ± 7 mL/min, P = 0.085). MAP following intervention (15 min) was higher in the REBOA-C than the CG-C group (71 ± 12 mm Hg versus 28 ± 31 mm Hg; P = 0.005). There were 5 deaths (71.4%) in the CG-C group, but none in the REBOA-C group (P = 0.010).
Balloon occlusion of the aorta is an effective method to control pelvic arterial hemorrhage. This technique should be further developed as an adjunct to manage noncompressible pelvic hemorrhage.
Journal of Surgical Research 05/2012; 177(2):341-7. DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2012.04.035 · 1.94 Impact Factor
07/2012; 73(1):282-5. DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e3182569df4
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.