The Accuracy of Platelet Counting in Thrombocytopenic Blood Samples Distributed by the UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme for General Haematology

UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme for General Haematology, Watford, England.
American Journal of Clinical Pathology (Impact Factor: 3.01). 01/2012; 137(1):65-74. DOI: 10.1309/AJCP86JMBFUCFCXA
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A knowledge of the limitations of automated platelet counting is essential for the effective care of thrombocytopenic patients and management of platelet stocks for transfusion. For this study, 29 external quality assessment specimen pools with platelet counts between 5 and 64 × 10(9)/L were distributed to more than 1,100 users of 23 different hematology analyzer models. The same specimen pools were analyzed by the international reference method (IRM) for platelet counting at 3 reference centers. The IRM values were on average lower than the all-methods median values returned by the automated analyzers. The majority (~67%) of the automated analyzer results overestimated the platelet count compared with the IRM, with significant differences in 16.5% of cases. Performance differed between analyzer models. The observed differences may depend in part on the nature of the survey material and analyzer technology, but the findings have implications for the interpretation of platelet counts at levels of clinical decision making.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Progestogen-only contraceptives (POCs) are suitable for women with thrombophilia and/or a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Several of these women, however, use oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT), which can impair the bleeding pattern associated with POC use. We evaluated the effects of OAT use on the bleeding pattern associated with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in women with thrombophilia and/or a history of VTE. This prospective cohort study followed two groups of women, all of whom were thrombophilic and/or had a history of VTE: OAT users and nonusers. Bleeding patterns, blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), weight, complete blood count and waist circumference were compared between the two groups before and 6 and 12 months after LNG-IUS insertion. The patient cohort consisted of 33 women aged 18 to 45 years old, including 16 OAT users and 17 nonusers. Body weight increased by 3.9% and BMI by 3.8% in OAT users 12 months after LNG-IUS insertion. Hemoglobin and hematocrit levels increased by approximately 10% in both groups. There was no difference between the groups in bleeding patterns, with amenorrhea being the most frequent pattern in both groups (41.2% each) 12 months after LNG-IUS insertion. OAT did not increase the frequency of prolonged and/or frequent bleeding. OAT users and nonusers had similar bleeding patterns after insertion of the LNG-IUS. Hemoglobin and hematocrit levels increased in both groups.
    Contraception 07/2013; 89(1). DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2013.06.012 · 2.93 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Obtaining accurate and precise platelet enumeration in automatic platelet analysers at low platelet counts is a challenge. To explore the performance of current haematology analysers in counting platelet concentrations usually used as platelet transfusion threshold. An international exercise where four blood samples with platelet levels near usual platelet transfusion thresholds was prepared and distributed. The samples shipped had a platelet count of 6·3, 13·3, 21·6 and 53·0 × 10(9) /l according to the international reference method. We received 82 sets of results from nine countries. Instruments from six different manufacturers were represented. Although the mean count for each of the four samples was very similar to the values, according to the reference method (9·0, 16·2, 23·0 and 57·6 × 10(9) /l), significant variability in the results was found. Assuming that these were patient samples and the result of the count used to indicate a prophylactic platelet transfusion, undertransfusion would have occurred for 24·5% of the LP1 samples at a transfusion threshold of 10 × 10(9) /l and, at a threshold of 20 × 10(9) /l, undertransfusion would have occurred for 7·2% of the LP1 and 16·2% of the LP2 samples and overtransfusion would have occurred with 23·1% of the LP3 samples. The results suggest that significant inaccuracy exists in counting low levels of platelets and that this inaccuracy might have a significant impact in under- and overtransfusion of platelet concentrates to patients.
    Vox Sanguinis 12/2013; DOI:10.1111/vox.12110 · 3.30 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Thrombocytopenia is associated with bleeding risk. However, in thrombocytopenic patients platelet count does not correlate with bleeding risk and other factors are thus likely to contribute to this risk. The present review presents currently available platelet-related markers available on automated haematology analysers and commonly used methods for testing platelet function. The test principles, advantages and disadvantages of each test are described. We also evaluate the current literature regarding the clinical utility of the test for prediction of bleeding in thrombocytopenia in haematological and oncological diseases. We find that several platelet-related markers are available but information about the clinical utility in thrombocytopenia is limited. Studies support that mean platelet volume (MPV) can aid diagnosing the cause of thrombocytopenia and low MPV may be associated with bleeding in thrombocytopenia. Flow cytometry, platelet aggregometry and platelet secretion tests are used to diagnose specific platelet function defects. The flow cytometric activation marker P-selectin and surface coverage by the Cone and Plate[let] analyser(™) predict bleeding in selected thrombocytopenic populations. To fully uncover the clinical utility of platelet-related tests, information about the prevalence of platelet function defects in thrombocytopenic conditions is required. Finally, knowledge of the performance in thrombocytopenic samples from patients is essential. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    European Journal Of Haematology 01/2014; 92(5). DOI:10.1111/ejh.12262 · 2.41 Impact Factor