Prismatic adaptation effects on spatial representation of time in neglect patients.

Department of Psychology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
Cortex (Impact Factor: 6.04). 11/2011; DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.11.010
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Processing of temporal information may require the use of spatial attention to represent time along a mental time line. We used prismatic adaptation (PA) to explore the contribution of spatial attention to the spatial representation of time in right brain damaged patients with and without neglect of left space and in age-matched healthy controls. Right brain damaged patients presented time underestimation deficits, that were significantly greater in patients with neglect than in patients without neglect. PA inducing leftward attentional deviation reduced time underestimation deficit in patients with neglect. The results support the hypothesis that a right hemispheric network has a role, per se, in time perception. Moreover, they suggest that right hemisphere is important in time perception for its control of spatial attention, engaged in spatial representation of time. Procedures that ameliorate left spatial deficits could also be useful for modulating temporal deficits in right brain damaged patients with neglect.

Download full-text


Available from: Stefano Avanzi, Jun 30, 2015
1 Follower
  • Source
    Frontiers in Psychology 06/2014; 5:542. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00542 · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Prismatic Adaptation (PA) has been shown to affect left-to-right spatial representations of temporal durations. A leftward aftereffect usually distorts time representation toward an underestimation, while rightward aftereffect usually results in an overestimation of temporal durations. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to study the neural mechanisms that underlie PA effects on time perception. Additionally, we investigated whether the effect of PA on time is transient or stable and, in the case of stability, which cortical areas are responsible of its maintenance. Functional brain images were acquired while participants (n=17) performed a time reproduction task and a control task before, immediately after and 30 minutes after PA inducing a leftward aftereffect, administered outside the scanner. The leftward aftereffect induced an underestimation of time intervals that lasted for at least 30 minutes. The left anterior insula and the left superior frontal gyrus showed increased functional activation immediately after versus before PA in the time versus the control task, suggesting these brain areas to be involved in the executive spatial manipulation of the representation of time. The left middle frontal gyrus showed an increase of activation after 30 minutes with respect to before PA. This suggests that this brain region may play a key role in the maintenance of the PA effect over time.
    NeuroImage 01/2014; 92. DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.028 · 6.13 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Time and space are tightly linked in the physical word. Recently, several lines of evidence have suggested that the mental representation of time might be spatial in nature. For instance, time-space interactions have been described as a strong preference to associate the past with the left space and the future with the right space. Here we review the growing evidence of interactions between time and space processing, systematized according to the type of interaction being investigated. We present the empirical findings supporting the possibility that humans represent the subjective time flow on a spatially oriented "mental time line" that is accessed through spatial attention mechanisms. The heterogeneous time-space interactions are then compared with the number-space interactions described in the numerical cognition literature. An alternative hypothesis, which maintains a common system for magnitude processing, including time, space, and number, is also discussed. Finally, we extend the discussion to the more general issue of how the representation of these concepts might be grounded into the cortical circuits that support spatial attention and sensorimotor transformations.
    Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 08/2012; 36(10):2257-2273. DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.08.007 · 10.28 Impact Factor