Article

Validation of Proposed DSM-5 Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder

Center for Pediatric Behavioral Health and Center for Autism, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA.
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 6.35). 01/2012; 51(1):28-40.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.09.021
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate the validity of proposed DSM-5 criteria for autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
We analyzed symptoms from 14,744 siblings (8,911 ASD and 5,863 non-ASD) included in a national registry, the Interactive Autism Network. Youth 2 through 18 years of age were included if at least one child in the family was diagnosed with ASD. Caregivers reported symptoms using the Social Responsiveness Scale and the Social Communication Questionnaire. The structure of autism symptoms was examined using latent variable models that included categories, dimensions, or hybrid models specifying categories and subdimensions. Diagnostic efficiency statistics evaluated the proposed DSM-5 algorithm in identifying ASD.
A hybrid model that included both a category (ASD versus non-ASD) and two symptom dimensions (social communication/interaction and restricted/repetitive behaviors) was more parsimonious than all other models and replicated across measures and subsamples. Empirical classifications from this hybrid model closely mirrored clinical ASD diagnoses (90% overlap), implying a broad ASD category distinct from non-ASD. DSM-5 criteria had superior specificity relative to DSM-IV-TR criteria (0.97 versus 0.86); however sensitivity was lower (0.81 versus 0.95). Relaxing DSM-5 criteria by requiring one less symptom criterion increased sensitivity (0.93 versus 0.81), with minimal reduction in specificity (0.95 versus 0.97).
Results supported the validity of proposed DSM-5 criteria for ASD as provided in Phase I Field Trials criteria. Increased specificity of DSM-5 relative to DSM-IV-TR may reduce false positive diagnoses, a particularly relevant consideration for low base rate clinical settings. Phase II testing of DSM-5 should consider a relaxed algorithm, without which as many as 12% of ASD-affected individuals, particularly females, will be missed. Relaxed DSM-5 criteria may improve identification of ASD, decreasing societal costs through appropriate early diagnosis and maximizing intervention resources.

4 Followers
 · 
205 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Impaired executive functioning (EF) has been proposed to underlie symptoms of autism spectrum disorders (ASD). However, insight in the EF profile of ASD individuals is hampered due to task impurity and inconsistent findings. To elucidate these inconsistencies, we investigated the influence of task and sample characteristics on EF in ASD, with an extended test battery designed to reduce task impurity. Additionally, we studied the relation between EF and ASD symptoms. EF (inhibition, cognitive flexibility, generativity, working memory and planning) was measured in open-ended versus structured assessment situations, while controlling for possible confounding EF and non-EF variables. The performance of 50 individuals with ASD was compared with that of 50 age, gender and IQ matched typically developing (TD) individuals. The effects of group (ASD versus TD), age (children versus adolescents) and gender were examined, as well as the correlation between age, IQ, ASD symptoms and EF. Individuals with ASD showed impairments in all EF domains, but deficits were more pronounced in open-ended compared to structured settings. Group differences did not depend on gender and only occasionally on participants' age. This suggests that inconsistencies between studies largely result from differences in task characteristics and less from differences in the investigated sample features. However, age and IQ strongly correlated with EF, indicating that group differences in these factors should be controlled for when studying EF. Finally, EF correlated with both social and non-social ASD symptoms, but further research is needed to clarify the nature of this relationship.
    European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 02/2015; DOI:10.1007/s00787-015-0689-1 · 3.55 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this article, we hypothesize that individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are born with a deficit in invariance detection, which is a learning process whereby people and animals come to attend the relatively stable patterns or structural regularities in the changing stimulus array. This paper synthesizes a substantial body of research which suggests that a deficit in the domain-general perceptual learning process of invariant detection in ASD can lead to a cascade of consequences in different developmental domains. We will outline how this deficit in invariant detection can cause uncertainty, unpredictability, and a lack of control for individuals with ASD and how varying degrees of impairments in this learning process can account for the heterogeneity of the ASD phenotype. We also describe how differences in neural plasticity in ASD underlie the impairments in perceptual learning. The present account offers an alternative to prior theories and contributes to the challenge of understanding the developmental trajectories that result in the variety of autistic behaviors.
    Frontiers in Psychology 01/2015; 6:359. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00359 · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Several studies have focused on the underlying symptom structure of Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD), but results have been equivocal. We performed a confirmatory factor analysis on data of the Developmental, Dimensional and Diagnostic Interview of 275 participants with ASD between 3 and 23 years of age, aimed at strengthening the empirical evidence of previously published factor structure solutions using the same instrument. As none of these hypothesised models fitted our data, an exploratory factor analysis was undertaken. Results pointed towards a five factor model. A ‘Restricted and Repetitive Behaviour and Interest’ factor could be separated from ‘Shaking and Nodding’, ‘Emotional Reciprocity’ and two other factors that both represented deficits in social interaction and communication. Although not completely confirming, our results are generally in favour of the present DSM-5 criteria. By showing that the items did not fully segregate according to theoretically postulated subdomains, we offer a possible explanation for the heterogeneity in proposed factor structures for ASD.
    Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 04/2015; 12. DOI:10.1016/j.rasd.2014.11.002 · 2.96 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
63 Downloads
Available from
May 20, 2014