"If only…": When counterfactual thoughts can reduce illusions of personal authorship.

Laura Dannenberg, Jens Förster, Nils B Jostmann

University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 15, 1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Journal Article: Consciousness and Cognition (impact factor: 2.14). 12/2011; 21(1):456-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.11.008

Abstract

Illusions of personal authorship can arise when causation for an event is ambiguous, but people mentally represent an anticipated outcome and then observe a corresponding match in reality. When people do not maintain such high-level outcome representations and focus instead on low-level behavioral representations of concrete actions, illusions of personal authorship can be reduced. One condition that yields specific action plans and thereby moves focus from high-level outcomes to low-level actions is the generation of counterfactual thoughts. Hence, in the present research we tested whether thinking counterfactually can reduce illusory authorship. In line with predictions, generating behavior-regulating counterfactuals reduced susceptibility to the illusion (Study 1). Importantly, this only occurred when people expected to re-encounter the situation to which the counterfactuals applied (Study 2). These findings extend existing research on the boundary conditions of illusory experiences of personal authorship and might hint at a relationship between the illusion and behavior regulation.

Source: PubMed

Comments on this publication

ResearchGate members can add comments. Sign up now and post your comment!

Similar publications

Science & Research Jobs

Keywords

anticipated outcome
 
behavior regulation
 
boundary conditions
 
causation
 
concrete actions
 
corresponding match
 
high-level outcome representations
 
high-level outcomes
 
Illusions
 
illusory authorship
 
illusory experiences
 
low-level actions
 
low-level behavioral representations
 
moves focus
 
personal authorship
 
predictions
 
present research
 
Study 1
 
Study 2
 
yields specific action plans