Thermodynamic and structural analysis of homodimeric proteins: Model of β-lactoglobulin

Departamento de Química Biológica-Centro de Investigaciones en Química Biológica de Córdoba (CIQUIBIC), Argentina.
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (Impact Factor: 4.66). 12/2011; 1824(2):383-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2011.11.005
Source: PubMed


The energetics of protein homo-oligomerization was analyzed in detail with the application of a general thermodynamic model. We have studied the thermodynamic aspects of protein-protein interaction employing β-lactoglobulin A from bovine milk at pH=6.7 where the protein is mainly in its dimeric form. We performed differential calorimetric scans at different total protein concentration and the resulting thermograms were analyzed with the thermodynamic model for oligomeric proteins previously developed. The thermodynamic model employed, allowed the prediction of the sign of the enthalpy of dimerization, the analysis of complex calorimetric profiles without transitions baselines subtraction and the obtainment of the thermodynamic parameters from the unfolding and the association processes and the compared with association parameters obtained with Isothermal Titration Calorimetry performed at different temperatures. The dissociation and unfolding reactions were also monitored by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and the results indicated that the dimer of β-lactoglobulin (N(2)) reversibly dissociates into monomeric units (N) which are structurally distinguishable by changes in their infrared absorbance spectra upon heating. Hence, it is proposed that β-lactoglobulin follows the conformational path induced by temperature:N(2)⇌2N⇌2D. The general model was validated with these results indicating that it can be employed in the study of the thermodynamics of other homo-oligomeric protein systems.

1 Follower
13 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Heating is commonly used in the manufacture of dairy products, but impacts of thermal denaturation on binding between whey protein and molecules such as pigments are poorly understood. The objective of this work was to study the impacts of thermal denaturation on binding between bixin, a pigment relevant to colored cheeses, and whey proteins using several complementary techniques. Fluorescence spectroscopy data showed that heat treatment caused tryptophan in β-lactoglobulin and α-lactalbumin to be exposed to a more polar environment, but the opposite was observed for bovine serum albumin. The fluorescence quenching study indicated that the quenching of whey protein fluorescence by bixin was static quenching, and the affinity of binding with bixin was enhanced after thermal denaturation, caused by a higher extent of unordered structures, as revealed by results from circular dichroism and Fourier transform infrared spectra. β-Lactoglobulin was responsible for overall impacts of thermal denaturation on binding between bixin and whey protein isolate.
    Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 07/2012; 60(30). DOI:10.1021/jf3021656 · 2.91 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In nature, proteins most often exist as complexes, with many of these consisting of identical subunits. Understanding of the energetics governing the folding and misfolding of such homooligomeric proteins is central to understanding their function and misfunction, in disease or biotechnology. Much progress has been made in defining the mechanisms and thermodynamics of homooligomeric protein folding. In this review, we outline models as well as calorimetric and spectroscopic methods for characterizing oligomer folding, and describe extensive results obtained for diverse proteins, ranging from dimers to octamers and higher order aggregates. To our knowledge, this area has not been reviewed comprehensively in years, and the collective progress is impressive. The results provide evolutionary insights into the development of subunit interfaces, mechanisms of oligomer folding, and contributions of oligomerization to protein stability, function and regulation. Thermodynamic analyses have also proven valuable for understanding protein misfolding and aggregation mechanisms, suggesting new therapeutic avenues. Successful recent designs of novel, functional proteins demonstrate increased understanding of oligomer folding. Further rigorous analyses using multiple experimental and computational approaches are still required, however, to achieve consistent and accurate prediction of oligomer folding energetics. Modelling the energetics remains challenging but is a promising avenue for future advances.
    Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 12/2012; 531(1). DOI:10.1016/ · 3.02 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Unlike most small globular proteins, lipocalins lack a compact hydrophobic core. Instead, they present a large central cavity that functions as the primary binding site for hydrophobic molecules. Not surprisingly, these proteins typically exhibit complex structural dynamics in solution, which is intricately modified by intermolecular recognition events. Although many lipocalins are monomeric, an increasing number of them have been proven to form oligomers. The coupling effects between self-association and ligand binding in these proteins are largely unknown. To address this issue, we have calorimetrically characterized the recognition of dodecyl sulfate by bovine β-lactoglobulin, which forms weak homodimers at neutral pH. A thermodynamic analysis based on coupled-equilibria revealed that dimerization exerts disparate effects on the ligand-binding capacity of β-lactoglobulin. Protein dimerization decreases ligand affinity (or, reciprocally, ligand binding promotes dimer dissociation). The two subunits in the dimer exhibit a positive, entropically driven cooperativity. To investigate the structural determinants of the interaction, the crystal structure of β-lactoglobulin bound to dodecyl sulfate was solved at 1.64 Å resolution. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    Journal of Molecular Recognition 02/2013; 26(2):67-75. DOI:10.1002/jmr.2249 · 2.15 Impact Factor
Show more