Executive summary: interventions to improve quality in the crowded emergency department.

From the Departments of Emergency Medicine and Health Policy, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Academic Emergency Medicine (Impact Factor: 2.2). 12/2011; 18(12):1229-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01228.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Emergency department (ED) crowding is a major public health problem in the United States, with increasing numbers of ED visits, longer lengths of stay in the ED, and the common practice of ED boarding. In the next several years, several measures of ED crowding will be assessed and reported on government websites. In addition, with the implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), millions more Americans will have health care insurance, many of whom will choose the ED for their care. In June 2011, a consensus conference was conducted in Boston, Massachusetts, by the journal Academic Emergency Medicine entitled "Interventions to Assure Quality in the Crowded Emergency Department." The overall goal of the conference was to develop a series of research agendas to identify promising interventions to safeguard the quality of emergency care during crowded periods and to reduce ED crowding altogether through systemwide solutions. This was achieved through three objectives: 1) a review of interventions that have been implemented to reduce crowding and summarize the evidence of their effectiveness on the delivery of emergency care; 2) to identify strategies within or outside of the health care setting (i.e., policy, engineering, operations management, system design) that may help reduce crowding or improve the quality of emergency care provided during episodes of ED crowding; and 3) to identify the most appropriate design and analytic techniques for rigorously evaluating ED interventions designed to reduce crowding or improve the quality of emergency care provided during episodes of ED crowding. This article describes the background and rationale for the conference and highlights some of the discussions that occurred on the day of the conference. A series of manuscripts on the details of the conference is presented in this issue of Academic Emergency Medicine.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To compare and analyze waiting time and length of stay between 2005 and 2012 in the obstetric and gynaecologic emergency unit of Nantes teaching hospital, new unit opened in 2004. Descriptive study from the registers over 2months' periods in 2005 and 2012. Despite an increase of the daily average number of visits from 28 to 39 (P<0.0001), the waiting time increased in obstetrics from 15minutes to 18 in 2012, P<0.03. In gynaecology, waiting time decreased in 2012 on daytime weekdays (37minutes versus 44) and increased on weekend (41minutes versus 28) and at night (37minutes versus 23) P<0.01. The length of stay was similar in obstetrics (108minutes versus 104) but reduced on daytime weekdays (124minutes in 2005, 109 in 2012, P<0.05). In gynaecology duration was similar (108minutes versus 105), but decreased on daytime weekdays (110minutes in 2005, 101 in 2012) and increased on overnight weekend (94minutes in 2005, 121 in 2012) (P<0.05). Our organization enabled to improve some lengths of time despite an increased activity. Those lengths of time should be monitored as they reflect our organizations and are indicators of efficiency.
    Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 10/2013; · 0.62 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The theme of the 14th annual Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference was "Global Health and Emergency Care: A Research Agenda." The goal of the conference was to create a robust and measurable research agenda for evaluating emergency health care delivery systems. The concept of health systems includes the organizations, institutions, and resources whose primary purpose is to promote, restore, and/or maintain health. This article further conceptualizes the vertical and horizontal delivery of acute and emergency care in low-resource settings by defining specific terminology for emergency care platforms and discussing how they fit into broader health systems models. This was accomplished through discussion surrounding four principal questions touching upon the interplay between health systems and acute and emergency care. This research agenda is intended to assist countries that are in the early stages of integrating emergency services into their health systems and are looking for guidance to maximize their development and health systems planning efforts.
    Academic Emergency Medicine 12/2013; 20(12):1278-1288. · 2.20 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives The goals of this study were to: (1) Identify valid variables that correlate with Emergency Department ED crowding and (2) Determine a model that could be used to accurate reflect the degree of ED crowding. Methods A site sampling form was applied to convenience sampling of 13 community hospitals in California between 4/6/2011 and 5/1/2011. The outcome variable was average perception of crowding by the ED physician and charge nurse on a 100mm visual analogue scale. We focused on 20 candidate predictor variables that represented counts and times in the ED that were collected every four hours. A prediction model was developed using multivariable linear regression to determine the measures that predicted ED crowding. A parsimonious model was developed to allow for a clinical useful tool that that explained a significant amount of variability predicted by the full ED crowding model. Results A total of 2,006 datasets were collected for each of the participating hospitals. A total of 1,628 time entries for the hospitals were included in the study. Hospital EDs had censuses ranging from 18,000 to 98,000. Full evaluation was completed on 1489 datasets. Twenty variables were considered for the full model with 7 removed due to multi-collinearity. The remaining 13 variables constituted the full model and explained 50.5% of the variability in the outcome variable. Five predictors were found to represent 92% of the variability represented by the full model. Conclusions Five variables were highly correlated with community ED crowding and could be used to model the full set of all variables in explaining ED crowding.
    The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 01/2014;

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Sep 15, 2014