Prophylactic intraoperative powdered vancomycin and postoperative deep spinal wound infection: 1,512 consecutive surgical cases over a 6-year period.

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Ave, Box 665, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
European Spine Journal (Impact Factor: 2.47). 12/2011; 21 Suppl 4:S476-82. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-2104-z
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of intraoperative powdered vancomycin on the rates of postoperative deep spinal wound infection. The use of intraoperative powdered vancomycin as a prophylactic measure in an attempt to reduce the incidence of postoperative spinal wound infection has not been sufficiently evaluated in the existing literature. A retrospective review of a large clinical database was performed to determine the rates of deep wound infection associated with the use of intraoperative operative site powdered vancomycin.
During the period from 2005 to 2010, 1,512 consecutive spinal surgery cases were performed by the same fellowship-trained spinal surgeon (RWM) at a level 1 trauma-university medical center. One gram of powdered vancomycin was placed in all surgical sites prior to wound closure. Eight hundred forty-nine cases were uninstrumented, 478 cases were instrumented posterior thoracic or lumbar, 12 were instrumented anterior thoracic or lumbar, 126 were instrumented anterior cervical, and 47 were instrumented posterior cervical cases. Fifty-eight cases were combined anterior and posterior surgery and 87 were revision surgeries. A retrospective operative database and medical record review was performed to evaluate for evidence of postoperative deep wound infection.
15 of the 1,512 patients (0.99%) were identified as having evidence of postoperative deep wound infection. At least one pre-existing risk factor for deep infection was present in 8/15 pts (54%). Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) were the most commonly identified organisms (11/15 cases). The rate of deep wound infection was 1.20% (8/663) for instrumented spinal surgeries, and 0.82% (7/849) for uninstrumented surgeries. Deep infection occurred in only 1.23% (4/324) of multilevel instrumented posterior spinal fusions, 1.37% (1/73) of open PLIF procedures, and 1.23% (1/81) of single-level instrumented posterior fusions. Deep infection was not observed in any patient who had uninstrumented spinal fusion (0/64). The deep infection rate for revision surgeries was 1.15% (1/87) and 0.55% (1/183) for trauma surgery. Increased rates of complications related to powdered vancomycin use were not identified in this series. Conclusion In this series of 1,512 consecutive spinal surgeries, the use of 1 g of powdered intraoperative vancomycin placed in the wound prior to wound closure appears to associated with a low rate deep spinal wound infection for both instrumented and uninstrumented cases. Rates of deep infection for instrumented fusion surgery, trauma, and revision surgery appear to be among the lowest reported in the existing literature. Further investigation of this prophylactic adjunctive measure is warranted.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Study Design. Retrospective analysis.Objective. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a surgical site infection (SSI) prevention protocol instituted in the Orthopaedic Spine Department at our institution.Summary of Background Data. SSI is an undesired complication of orthopaedic spine surgeries. It poses a significant risk to the patient, as well as a financial toll on the healthcare system. A wide range of prophylactic measures have been used to attempt to reduce SSI rates.Methods. A protocol consisting of a combination of 0.3% Betadine wound irrigation and 1 gram of intra-wound Vancomycin powder application was developed at our institution. Multiple data sources were consolidated for thorough evaluation of changes in SSI rates, patient risk factors, and changes in bacteriology. Identification of risk factors that predispose patients to SSI was performed using mixed effects logistic regression in a univariate fashion. Risk factors with p-values of ≤ 0.05 in univariate analysis were included together in a multivariate mixed effects logistic regression model.Results. SSI rates were reduced by 50% following the intervention; Chi square analysis comparing the SSI rates between the pre- and post-intervention periods yielded a p-value of 0.042. Rates of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus dropped from 30% to 7% and the rates of multi-bacterial infections dropped from 37% to 27%. The risk factors that were statistically significant in multivariate analysis were the following: age (OR 0.93), anemia (OR 30.73), prior operation (OR 27.45), and vertebral fracture (OR 22.22).Conclusion. The combination of Betadine wound irrigation and intra-wound vancomycin powder application led to both a clinically and statistically significant decrease in SSI rates by 50%. Bacteriology analysis and risk factor assessment proved to be valuable tools in assessing the efficacy of a new prophylactic measure and in the planning of future protocols.
    Spine 01/2015; DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000789 · 2.45 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Where Are We Now?Orthopaedic infection can be a devastating consequence of traumatic injuries and surgical interventions, including prosthetic joint replacements and revisions [9]. The risk of persistent, recurrent, or new infection in revision total joint arthroplasty may be as high as 20% when the indication for revision is infection [4]. Attachment of bacteria or fungi to implants to form biofilm presents a tremendous challenge to clinical treatment, particularly when polymicrobial contamination is present [8]. Due to the senescent phenotypic state of biofilm microorganisms, as well as to the secretion of protective mucopolysaccharide matrices, biofilm microorganisms evade common microbicidal strategies. These are only eradicated by antibiotic concentrations 100 to 1000 times the minimum inhibitory concentration for planktonic microorganisms [7], and because of this, at present, most of these infections are treated by removal of the infected implant followed by aggressive débridemen ...
    Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 10/2014; 473(1). DOI:10.1007/s11999-014-3992-0 · 2.88 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Surgical site infection (SSI) after spinal surgery can result in several serious secondary complications, such as pseudoarthrosis, neurological injury, paralysis, sepsis, and death. There is an increasing body of literature on risk factors, diagnosis, and specific intraoperative interventions, including attention to sterility of instrumentation, application of minimally invasive fusion techniques, intraoperative irrigation, and application of topical antibiotics, that hold the most promise for reduction of surgical site infection.
    The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society 09/2014; 15(2). DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2014.09.022 · 2.80 Impact Factor


Available from