Self-deception's adaptive value: Effects of positive thinking and the winner effect.

Jason Kido Lopez, Matthew J Fuxjager

Department of Philosophy, Siena College - 34C Morrell Science Center, 515 Loudon Rd., Loudonville, NY 12211, United States.

Journal Article: Consciousness and Cognition (impact factor: 2.14). 12/2011; 21(1):315-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.10.008

Abstract

There is a puzzle about why self-deception, a process that obscures the truth, is so pervasive in human behavior given that tracking the truth seems important for our survival and reproduction. William von Hippel and Robert Trivers argue that, despite appearances, there is good reason to think that self-deception is an adaptation by arguing: (1) self-deception leads to a positive self-perception and (2) a positive self-perception increases an individual's fitness. D.S. Neil Van Leeuwen, however, gives persuasive arguments against both steps. In response, we will defend both propositions, thereby supporting the conclusion that self-deception indeed has adaptive value. The first premise will be bolstered by a survey of the philosophical literature and empirical work on self-deception, whereas the second will be strengthened by empirical research on a behavioral phenomenon known as the winner effect.

Source: PubMed

Comments on this publication

ResearchGate members can add comments. Sign up now and post your comment!

Science & Research Jobs

Keywords

behavioral phenomenon
 
D.S. Neil Van Leeuwen
 
first premise
 
human behavior
 
individual's fitness
 
obscures
 
persuasive arguments
 
philosophical literature
 
positive self-perception
 
positive self-perception increases
 
puzzle
 
Robert Trivers
 
winner effect