Clinical, endoscopic and histopathological profiles of parasitic duodenitis cases diagnosed by upper digestive endoscopy

Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brasil.
Arquivos de gastroenterologia 12/2011; 48(4):225-30. DOI: 10.1590/S0004-28032011000400002
Source: PubMed


Intestinal parasites induce detectable histopathological changes, which have been studied in groups with known diagnosis of parasitic disease. There is no available study with a larger base without previous diagnosis.
To describe clinical and histopathological findings of parasitosis diagnosed by endoscopic biopsy in patients submitted to upper digestive endoscopy.
Recorded biopsies archive at "Complexo Hospitalar Professor Edgar Santos" , a general teaching Hospital in the state of Bahia, Northeast Brazil, from January 1995 to January 2009, were reviewed. One thousand ten duodenal biopsy reports were found. Reports positive for parasites had their specimens reviewed and photographed. All blocks of biopsy selected as case were retrieved and reviewed by an experienced pathologist. Clinical, laboratorial and endoscopic data were collected.
Eleven biopsies showed parasites, including cases of Cryptosporidium sp. and Strongyloides stercoralis. Vomiting (91%), abdominal pain (78%), diarrhea (78%) and weight loss (78%) were usual symptoms. Seventy-five percent had duodenal mucosa changes on endoscopy, while 25% have no changes. Anemia and low serum albumin were important laboratorial data. HIV infection association was observed. Villus atrophy and reactive epithelium were usual in Strongyloides cases.
No endoscopic or histopathologic finding was pathognomonic. One percent of duodenal endoscopic biopsies showed parasites.


Available from: Jorge Carvalho Guedes, Sep 13, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background and study aim: Helminthic and protozoal infestation of the alimentary tract is endemic in tropical and subtropical areas and also occur in temperate zones. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency and characterization of parasites detected during upper digestive endoscopic procedures. Patients and methods: Retrospective analysis of the records of patients exposed to upper endoscopic procedures in the endoscopy units, Tropical Medicine Department, Zagazig University Hospitals, Egypt in a 5 year period extending from January 2007 to January 2012. A total of 4925 cases were included; 4708 cases for gastrodudenoscopy (EGDS) and 217 cases for endoscopic-retrograde-cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP). All cases were reviewed as regard age, sex, residence, indications for endoscopy and endoscopic features. Cases with parasitic infestations were characterized regarding the mentioned variables. Results: A total of 8 cases with parasitic infestations were described. Six cases detected by EGDS and 2 cases by ERCP. Five cases were Ancylostoma duodenale , one case Ascaris lumbricoides, one case Strongyloides stercoralis and one case Fasciola hepatica. Most cases were presented with anemia and persistent epigastric pain. Seven cases were associated with duodenitis on endoscopic examination. Conclusion: Parasites are not common findings during upper digestive endoscopic procedures, and should be suspected in patients with anemia and persistent epigastric pain.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Strongyloidiasis is caused by Strongyloides stercoralis, which commonly produces gastrointestinal problems. If immune systems are compromised, the nematode larvae may spread and produce Strongyloides hyperinfection. Diagnosis of strongyloidiasis is based on the observation of larvae in coproparasitological studies. We present a case of a 49-year-oldman, VIH, who developed Strongyloides hyperinfection, diagnosed postmortem. Our patient reached the dissemination stage, which resulted in severe damage to the stomach and intestine, perforation of the intestinal wall, as well as sepsis due to the dissemination of bacteria. The diagnosis is difficult because of the low larvae excretion in stools. It is usually performed by the microscopic examination of fresh and fixed enriched stool samples. Serology was reported to be useful for screening and follow-up after treatment. This case reaffirms that HIV immunosuppression favours the dissemination of S stercoralis larvae. Thus, a search for intestinal parasites should be considered in similar cases.
    Case Reports 11/2012; 2012(nov29 1). DOI:10.1136/bcr-2012-006819
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To provide a comprehensive review of the literature as it relates to diarrhea in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. In this article, we review the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis and management of diarrhea in SOT recipients and discuss recent advances and challenges. Methods: Two investigators conducted independent literature searches using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus until January 1st, 2013. All databases were searched using a combination of the terms diarrhea, solid organ transplant, SOT, transplant associated diarrhea, and transplant recipients. Articles that discussed diarrhea in SOT recipients were reviewed and relevant cross-references also read and evaluated for inclusion. Selection bias could be a possible limitation of the approach used in selecting or finding articles for this article. Findings: Post-transplant diarrhea is a common and distressing occurrence in patients, which can have significant deleterious effects on the clinical course and well-being of the organ recipient. A majority of cases are due to infectious and drug-related etiologies. However, various other etiologies including inflammatory bowel disease must be considered in the differential diagnosis. A step-wise, informed approach to post-transplant diarrhea will help the clinician achieve the best diagnostic yield. The use of diagnostic endoscopy should be preceded by exclusion of an infectious or drug-related cause of diarrhea. Empiric management with antidiarrheal agents, probiotics, and lactose-free diets may have a role in managing patients for whom no cause can be determined even after an extensive investigation. Conclusions: Physicians should be familiar with the common etiologies that result in post-transplant diarrhea. A directed approach to diagnosis and treatment will not only help to resolve the diarrhea but also prevent potentially life-threatening consequences including loss of the graft as well. Prospective studies are required to determine the etiology of post-transplant diarrhea in different clinical and geographic settings.
    Current Medical Research and Opinion 06/2013; 29(10). DOI:10.1185/03007995.2013.816278 · 2.65 Impact Factor
Show more