Non-DNA-binding cofactors enhance DNA-binding specificity of a transcriptional regulatory complex

Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Molecular Systems Biology (Impact Factor: 14.1). 12/2011; 7:555. DOI: 10.1038/msb.2011.89
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Recruitment of cofactors to specific DNA sites is integral for specificity in gene regulation. As a model system, we examined how targeting and transcriptional control of the sulfur metabolism genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is governed by recruitment of the transcriptional co-activator Met4. We developed genome-scale approaches to measure transcription factor (TF) DNA-binding affinities and cofactor recruitment to >1300 genomic binding site sequences. We report that genes responding to the TF Cbf1 and cofactor Met28 contain a novel 'recruitment motif' (RYAAT), adjacent to Cbf1 binding sites, which enhances the binding of a Met4-Met28-Cbf1 regulatory complex, and that abrogation of this motif significantly reduces gene induction under low-sulfur conditions. Furthermore, we show that correct recognition of this composite motif requires both non-DNA-binding cofactors Met4 and Met28. Finally, we demonstrate that the presence of an RYAAT motif next to a Cbf1 site, rather than Cbf1 binding affinity, specifies Cbf1-dependent sulfur metabolism genes. Our results highlight the need to examine TF/cofactor complexes, as novel specificity can result from cofactors that lack intrinsic DNA-binding specificity.

Download full-text


Available from: Trevor Siggers, Aug 08, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Highlights: Direct physical interactions for the majority of Drosophila TFs are analyzed TF protein interactions are integrated with existing genomic data sets A resource for studying the biology of transcription factors is provided TF interactions are used to functionally interrogate the master-mind signaling network In Brief In this study, Rhee et al. systematically identify protein interactions for Drosophila transcription factors using a co-affinity purification/mass spectrometry approach. These data are integrated with existing genomic data sets to probe aspects of the Notch signaling pathway, and they provide a rich resource for forming biological hypotheses.
    Cell Reports 09/2014; 8(6):1-13. DOI:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.038
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A major challenge in obtaining a full molecular description of evolutionary adaptation is to characterize how transcription factor (TF) DNA-binding specificity can change. To identify mechanisms of TF diversification, we performed detailed comparisons of yeast C2H2 ZF proteins with identical canonical recognition residues that are expected to bind the same DNA sequences. Unexpectedly, we found that ZF proteins can adapt to recognize new binding sites in a modular fashion whereby binding to common core sites remains unaffected. We identified two distinct mechanisms, conserved across multiple Ascomycota species, by which this molecular adaptation occurred. Our results suggest a route for TF evolution that alleviates negative pleiotropic effects by modularly gaining new binding sites. These findings expand our current understanding of ZF DNA binding and provide evidence for paralogous ZFs utilizing alternate modes of DNA binding to recognize unique sets of noncanonical binding sites.
    Molecular Cell 08/2014; 55(4). DOI:10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.019
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The term "transcriptional network" refers to the mechanism(s) that underlies coordinated expression of genes, typically involving transcription factors (TFs) binding to the promoters of multiple genes, and individual genes controlled by multiple TFs. A multitude of studies in the last two decades have aimed to map and characterize transcriptional networks in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We review the methodologies and accomplishments of these studies, as well as challenges we now face. For most yeast TFs, data have been collected on their sequence preferences, in vivo promoter occupancy, and gene expression profiles in deletion mutants. These systematic studies have led to the identification of new regulators of numerous cellular functions and shed light on the overall organization of yeast gene regulation. However, many yeast TFs appear to be inactive under standard laboratory growth conditions, and many of the available data were collected using techniques that have since been improved. Perhaps as a consequence, comprehensive and accurate mapping among TF sequence preferences, promoter binding, and gene expression remains an open challenge. We propose that the time is ripe for renewed systematic efforts toward a complete mapping of yeast transcriptional regulatory mechanisms.
    Genetics 09/2013; 195(1):9-36. DOI:10.1534/genetics.113.153262