Article

Effect of endoscopic screening at 1-year intervals on the clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment of gastric cancer in South Korea.

Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Impact Factor: 3.33). 12/2011; 27(5):928-34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.07038.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The recommended interval of endoscopic screening for gastric cancer (GC) in a general population is 2 years in Korea. However, it has not been determined whether endoscopic screening with a shorter interval is beneficial, especially for high-risk groups.
A total of 415 patients with GC were categorized according to whether they had (vigilant screening group) or not (non-vigilant screening group) undergone endoscopic screening within 1 year before being diagnosed with GC. Clinicopathologic GC characteristics of the two groups were compared. Next, the same analyses were conducted in subgroups of patients with high risk for GC including males, current smokers, first-degree relatives of GC; and patients with Helicobacter pylori infection, gastric atrophy, or intestinal metaplasia (IM).
The proportion of vigilant screening patients was 36.1%. Early gastric cancer (EGC) was more frequently observed in the vigilant screening group than the non-vigilant screening group (62.7% vs 49.4%, P = 0.009). In the high-risk factor analyses, EGC was more frequently detected among patients with severe IM in the vigilant screening group than the non-vigilant screening group (66.7% vs 35.5%, P = 0.047). In addition, more patients in the vigilant screening group had undergone endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD; 26.7% vs 0%, P = 0.008) and had stage I (84.6% vs 41.7%, P = 0.012) than in the non-vigilant screening group.
Endoscopic screening for GC at 1-year intervals would be beneficial for patients with severe IM in South Korea; this method could detect EGC for which the curative modality would be ESD.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
54 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We used Helicobacter pylori sero-positivity and mucosal atrophy as detected by the serum pepsinogen method to identify H. pylori infection-negative gastric cancer patients with or without atrophy. One hundred and six of 748 (14.2%) primary gastric cancer patients were infection-negative by a serum antibody detection system. Further, 121 (16.2%) of the 748 were negative for gastric mucosal atrophy by the pepsinogen method, of whom 15/748 (2.0%) were H. pylori-negative by pepsinogen I level (>70 ng/mL) and pepsinogen I/II ratio (>3.0). Twenty-seven of 782 (3.6%) gastric cancer patients were H. pylori-negative by antibodies and severe atrophy as determined by pepsinogen I level (<30 ng/mL) and pepsinogen I/II ratio (<2.0). H. pylori-negative gastric cancer patients with severe atrophy likely had a previous infection. These results indicate that the actual number of H. pylori-negative patients is 2.0% at minimum and 10.6% (14.2% minus 3.6%) at maximum in the general Japanese population. Five of 15 (33%) cases displaying neither anti-H. pylori antibodies nor atrophy were intestinal-type and 10 (67%) were diffuse-type adenocarcinomas. Thirteen surgical patients with primary gastric cancer displaying neither antibodies nor mucosal atrophy were further analyzed for pathological and phenotypic characteristics. The mucin phenotype was divided into four gastric, five gastric and intestinal, two intestinal and two null types, independent of histological classification. Intestinal phenotype elements were detected by Cdx2 immunohistochemical methods in nine of 13 (70%) cases examined. We conclude that a small fraction of gastric cancer patients displayed multifactorial carcinogenesis without H. pylori infection, indicating that gastric cancer risk still exists in the absence of H. pylori infection, at an incidence of 2.0% at minimum and 10.6% at maximum in the general Japanese population.
    Cancer Science 07/2007; 98(6):790-4. · 3.48 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this review is to examine recent advances in the techniques and technologies of endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer (EGC). Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of EGC, with negligible risk of lymph node metastasis, is a standard technique in Japan and is increasingly becoming accepted and regularly used in Western countries. EMR is a minimally invasive technique which is safe, convenient, and efficacious; however, it is insufficient when treating larger lesions. The evidence suggests that difficulties with the correct assessment of depth of tumor invasion lead to an increase in local recurrence with standard EMR when lesions are larger than 15 mm. A major factor contributing to this increase in local recurrence relates to lesions being excised piecemeal due to the technical limitations of standard EMR. A new development in endoscopic techniques is to dissect directly along the submucosal layer -- a procedure called endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). This allows the en-bloc resection of larger lesions. ESD is not necessarily limited by lesion size and it is predicted to replace conventional surgery in dealing with certain stages of ECG. However, it still has a higher complication rate when compared to standard EMR, and it requires high levels of endoscopic skill and experience. Endoscopic techniques, indications, pathological assessment, and methods of endoscopic resection of EGC need to be established for carrying out appropriate treatment and for the collation of long-term outcome data.
    Gastric Cancer 02/2007; 10(1):1-11. · 3.99 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study was performed to determine whether serum pepsinogen (PG) and gastrin testing can be used to detect gastric cancer in Korea. Serum levels of PG I (sPGI) and sPGII, PG I/II ratios, and gastrin levels were measured in 1006 patients with gastroduodenal diseases including cancer. Follow-up tests were performed 1 year after Helicobacter pylori eradication. sPGI and sPGII levels increased and PG I/II ratios decreased in line with the severity of activity, chronic inflammation, and the presence of H. pylori (p < .01). In contrast, sPGI levels and PG I/II ratios decreased in proportion with the severity of atrophic gastritis (AG)/intestinal metaplasia (p < .01). Gastrin levels were found to be correlated with chronic inflammation negatively in the antrum but positively in the corpus. H. pylori eradication reduced sPGI, sPGII, and gastrin levels, and increased PG I/II ratios to the levels of H. pylori-negative patients, and was found to be correlated with reductions in activity and chronic inflammation of gastritis. The sensitivity and specificity of a PG I/II ratio of < or = 3.0 for the detection of dysplasia or cancer were 55.8-62.3% and 61%, respectively. In addition, sPGI and sPGII levels of intestinal-type cancer were significantly lower than those of the diffuse type, respectively (p = .008 and p = .05, respectively). Gastric cancer risk was highest in the H. pylori-positive, low PGI/II ratio (< or = 3.0) group with an odds ratio of 5.52 (confidence interval: 2.83-10.77). PG I/II ratio (< or = 3.0) was found to be a reliable marker for the detection of dysplasia or gastric cancer, especially of the intestinal type. This detection power of PG I/II ratio (< or = 3.0) significantly increased in the presence of H. pylori, and thus, provides a means of selecting those at high risk of developing gastric cancer in Korea.
    Helicobacter 05/2008; 13(2):146-56. · 3.51 Impact Factor