Assessing the contribution of prescribing in primary care by nurses and professionals allied to medicine: a systematic review of literature.
Faculty of Health & Social Care Sciences, St. George's University of London & Kingston University, Grosvenor Wing, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 ORE, UK.
Journal Article: BMC Health Services Research (impact factor: 1.66). 12/2011; 11:330. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-330
Abstract
A integrative review of literature on non-medical prescribing in primary care was undertaken guided by dimensions of health care quality: effectiveness, acceptability, efficiency and access.
19 papers of 17 empirical studies were identified which provided evidence of patient outcome of non medical prescribing in primary care settings. The majority were undertaken in the UK with only one each from the USA, Canada, Botswana and Zimbabwe. Only two studies investigated clinical outcomes of non-medical prescribing. Seven papers reported on qualitative designs and four of these had fewer than ten participants. Most studies reported that non medical prescribing was widely accepted and viewed positively by patients and professionals.
Primary health care is the setting where timely access to safe and appropriate medicines is most critical for the well-being of any population. The gradual growth over time of legislative authority and in the numbers of non-medical prescribers, particularly nurses, in some countries suggests that the acceptability of non-medical prescribing is based on the perceived value to the health care system as a whole. Our review suggests that there are substantial gaps in the knowledge base to help evidence based policy making in this arena. We suggest that future studies of non-medical prescribing in primary care focus on the broad range of patient and health service outcomes and include economic dimensions.
Source: PubMed
Comments on this publication
ResearchGate members can add comments. Sign up now and post your comment!
Similar publications
Does team-based primary health care improve patients' perception of outcomes? Evidence from the 2007-08 Canadian Survey of Experiences with Primary Health.
Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 105(1):71-83.
Health insurance and children with disabilities.
The Future of children / Center for the Future of Children, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. 22(1):123-48.
The Depression Treatment Cascade in Primary Care: A Public Health Perspective.
Current psychiatry reports.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.
Resources
Science & Research Jobs
Postdoctoral Fellow-Laboratory of Neurosciences
Position: PostDoc Position
Employer: National Institute on Aging
Consumer Lifestyle- Product Researcher
Position: Researcher
Employer: Philips (China) Investment Co.,Ltd

