Assessing the contribution of prescribing in primary care by nurses and professionals allied to medicine: a systematic review of literature.

Sadiq Bhanbhro, Vari M Drennan, Robert Grant, Ruth Harris

Faculty of Health & Social Care Sciences, St. George's University of London & Kingston University, Grosvenor Wing, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 ORE, UK.

Journal Article: BMC Health Services Research (impact factor: 1.66). 12/2011; 11:330. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-330

Abstract

Safe and timely access to effective and appropriate medication through primary care settings is a major concern for all countries addressing both acute and chronic disease burdens. Legislation for nurses and other professionals allied to medicine to prescribe exists in a minority of countries, with more considering introducing legislation. Although there is variation in the range of medicines permitted to be prescribed, questions remain as to the contribution prescribing by nurses and professionals allied to medicine makes to the care of patients in primary care and what is the evidence on which clinicians, commissioners of services and policy makers can consider this innovation.
A integrative review of literature on non-medical prescribing in primary care was undertaken guided by dimensions of health care quality: effectiveness, acceptability, efficiency and access.
19 papers of 17 empirical studies were identified which provided evidence of patient outcome of non medical prescribing in primary care settings. The majority were undertaken in the UK with only one each from the USA, Canada, Botswana and Zimbabwe. Only two studies investigated clinical outcomes of non-medical prescribing. Seven papers reported on qualitative designs and four of these had fewer than ten participants. Most studies reported that non medical prescribing was widely accepted and viewed positively by patients and professionals.
Primary health care is the setting where timely access to safe and appropriate medicines is most critical for the well-being of any population. The gradual growth over time of legislative authority and in the numbers of non-medical prescribers, particularly nurses, in some countries suggests that the acceptability of non-medical prescribing is based on the perceived value to the health care system as a whole. Our review suggests that there are substantial gaps in the knowledge base to help evidence based policy making in this arena. We suggest that future studies of non-medical prescribing in primary care focus on the broad range of patient and health service outcomes and include economic dimensions.

Source: PubMed

Comments on this publication

ResearchGate members can add comments. Sign up now and post your comment!

Similar publications

Available from:
Preview full-text

Science & Research Jobs

Keywords

17 empirical studies
 
19 papers
 
appropriate medicines
 
broad range
 
chronic disease burdens
 
contribution prescribing
 
economic dimensions
 
future studies
 
health care quality
 
health care system
 
integrative review
 
knowledge base
 
non medical prescribing
 
non-medical prescribing
 
primary care
 
primary care focus
 
primary care settings
 
Primary health care
 
provided evidence
 
qualitative designs