Article

Impact of Meat Consumption, Preparation, and Mutagens on Aggressive Prostate Cancer

Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.53). 11/2011; 6(11):e27711. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027711
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The association between meat consumption and prostate cancer remains unclear, perhaps reflecting heterogeneity in the types of tumors studied and the method of meat preparation--which can impact the production of carcinogens.
We address both issues in this case-control study focused on aggressive prostate cancer (470 cases and 512 controls), where men reported not only their meat intake but also their meat preparation and doneness level on a semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire. Associations between overall and grilled meat consumption, doneness level, ensuing carcinogens and aggressive prostate cancer were assessed using multivariate logistic regression.
Higher consumption of any ground beef or processed meats were positively associated with aggressive prostate cancer, with ground beef showing the strongest association (OR = 2.30, 95% CI:1.39-3.81; P-trend = 0.002). This association primarily reflected intake of grilled or barbequed meat, with more well-done meat conferring a higher risk of aggressive prostate cancer. Comparing high and low consumptions of well/very well cooked ground beef to no consumption gave OR's of 2.04 (95% CI:1.41-2.96) and 1.51 (95% CI:1.06-2.14), respectively. In contrast, consumption of rare/medium cooked ground beef was not associated with aggressive prostate cancer. Looking at meat mutagens produced by cooking at high temperatures, we detected an increased risk with 2-amino-3,8-Dimethylimidazo-[4,5-f]Quinolaxine (MelQx) and 2-amino-3,4,8-trimethylimidazo(4,5-f)qunioxaline (DiMelQx), when comparing the highest to lowest quartiles of intake: OR = 1.69 (95% CI:1.08-2.64;P-trend = 0.02) and OR = 1.53 (95% CI:1.00-2.35; P-trend = 0.005), respectively.
Higher intake of well-done grilled or barbequed red meat and ensuing carcinogens could increase the risk of aggressive prostate cancer.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Jill Hardin, Sep 11, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
147 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Numerous epidemiological studies have suggested dietary factors may alter the risk of prostate cancer. Punnen and colleagues have conducted a case-control study focused on aggressive prostate cancer (N = 982), where not only details on meat consumption were collected, but also meat preparation was captured. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to assess the association between meat consumption, grilled meat consumption, doneness level, mutagens and aggressive prostate cancer. High consumption of processed meat, including ground beef, was associated with aggressive prostate cancer. Ground beef showed the strongest association (overall risk, OR = 2.30, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.39-3.81; P-trend = 0.002). Well-done meat conferred a higher risk of aggressive prostate cancer. Interestingly, the consumption of rare or less cooked meat was not associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer. When the investigators evaluated the estimated meat mutagens produced by cooking at high temperatures, they identified an increased risk with MelQx and DiMelQx, OR = 1.69 95% CI: 1.08-2.64, P-trend = 0.02 and OR = 1.53 95% CI: 1.00-2.35, P-trend = 0.005, respectively.
    Cancer biology & therapy 10/2012; 13(12):1141-2. DOI:10.4161/cbt.21463 · 3.63 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Carcinogen-DNA adducts are a marker of DNA damage and a possible promoter of carcinogenesis. We have previously shown that polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-DNA adduct levels in prostate cancer cases vary by cellular histology and higher adduct levels are associated with biochemical recurrence. Methods: A nested case-control study was conducted in a historical cohort of 6,692 men with histopathologically benign prostate specimens. PAH-DNA adduct levels were determined by immunohistochemistry in benign prostate specimens from 536 prostate cancer case-control pairs (59% White; 41% African American). We estimated the overall and race-stratified risk of subsequent prostate cancer associated with higher adduct levels.Results: Prostate cancer risk for men with elevated adduct levels (defined as greater than control group median) was slightly increased (Odds Ratio (OR)=1.28; 95% Confidence Interval (CI)=0.98-1.67; P=0.07). After race stratification, high adduct levels were significantly associated with increased risk in African American men (OR=1.56; CI=1.00-2.44; *P=0.05) but not White men (OR=1.14; CI=0.82-1.59; P=0.45). Elevated PAH-DNA adduct levels were significantly associated with 60% increased risk of prostate cancer among cases diagnosed 1-4 years after cohort entry (OR=1.60; CI=1.07-2.41) with a much greater increased risk observed in African Americans within the first four years of follow-up (OR=4.71; CI =1.97-11.26; ***P=0.0005). Analyses stratified by age or tumor grade revealed no additional significant heterogeneity in risk. Conclusion: Increased prostate cancer risk associated with high PAH-DNA adduct levels in benign prostate was found only in African Americans; risk was greatest within four years of follow-up, possibly reflecting a carcinogenic process not yet histologically detectable.
    Carcinogenesis 10/2012; DOI:10.1093/carcin/bgs326 · 5.27 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Risk factors for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) are well defined, while the role of diet in these conditions remains controversial. To help elucidate the role of particular dietary components, major bibliographic databases were searched for published studies (1990-2011) on associations between esophageal cancer risk (EC) and consumption of various types of meat and fish. Random-effects models and dose-response meta-analyses were used to pool study results. Subgroup analyses were conducted by histological subtype, study design, and nationality. Four cohorts and 31 case-control studies were identified. The overall pooled relative risk (RR) of EC and the confidence intervals (CIs) for the groups with the highest versus the lowest levels of intake were as follows: 0.99 (95% CI: 0.85-1.15) for total meat; 1.40 (95%CI: 1.09-1.81) for red meat; 1.41 (95%CI: 1.13-1.76) for processed meat; 0.87 (95%CI: 0.60-1.24) for poultry; and 0.80 (95%CI: 0.64-1.00) for fish. People with the highest levels of red meat intake had a significantly increased risk of ESCC. Processed meat intake was associated with increased risk of EAC. These results suggest that low levels of red and processed meat consumption and higher levels of fish intake might reduce EC risk.
    Nutrition Reviews 05/2013; 71(5):257-267. DOI:10.1111/nure.12028 · 5.54 Impact Factor