Article

Exposure to metal-working fluids in the automobile industry and the risk of male germ cell tumours

Bremen Institute for Prevention Research and Social Medicine, Bremen, Germany.
Occupational and environmental medicine (Impact Factor: 3.23). 11/2011; 69(3):224-6. DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2011-100070
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In a previous analysis of a case-control study of testicular cancer nested in a cohort of automobile workers, we observed an increased risk for testicular cancer among workers who had ever been involved in occupational metal-cutting tasks. We investigated whether this risk increase was due to exposure to metal-working fluids (MWF).
Occupational exposure to MWF was assessed in detail using a job-specific questionnaire for metal-cutting work. We calculated ORs and associated 95% CIs individually matched for age (±2 years) and adjusted for a history of cryptorchidism by conditional logistic regression.
The prevalence of exposure to MWF was 39.8% among cases and 40.1% among controls. For total germ cell tumours and seminomas we did not observe risk increases for metal-cutting tasks or occupational exposure to MWF (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.32 and OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.58 to 1.35, respectively). However, dermal exposure to oil-based MWF was associated with an increased risk for non-seminomatous testicular cancer. Dermal exposure to oil-based MWF for more than 5000 h showed particularly high risk estimates (OR 4.72; 95% CI 1.48 to 15.09).
Long-term dermal exposure to oil-based MWF was a risk factor for the development of non-seminomatous testicular germ cell cancer. Possible measures to reduce exposure include the introduction of engineering control measures such as venting or enclosing of machines, and enforcing the use of personal protective equipment during metal cutting.

0 Followers
 · 
100 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Keimzelltumoren des Hodens gehören zu den seltenen Tumoren, weisen aber seit Jahren eine leicht ansteigende Inzidenz auf, die in Deutschland etwas höher als in vielen anderen europäischen Ländern ist.Auswertung von Daten aus dem Zentrum für Krebsregisterdaten beim Robert-Koch-Institut (RKI) und der Gesellschaft der Krebsregister in Deutschland (GEKID) sowie dem Globocan-System der Internationalen Krebsforschungsagentur IARC; selektive Literaturrecherche in der Datenbank PubMed und gezielte Auswahl und Analyse neuer epidemiologischer Studien.Epidemiologisch und klinisch ist die ungewöhnliche Altersverteilung mit höheren Risiken im jungen bis mittleren Alter von Bedeutung. Zu den wenigen etablierten Risikofaktoren gehören der Kryptorchismus und eine genetische Disposition. Endokrine Disruptoren als mögliche Tumorursachen werden aktuell intensiv erforscht. Das Survival der Hodentumorpatienten ist insgesamt sehr hoch; Verbesserungen scheinen bei älteren Patienten noch in gewissem Umfang möglich zu sein.
    Der Onkologe 07/2013; 19(7). DOI:10.1007/s00761-013-2476-2 · 0.13 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Testicular germ cell tumours (TGCT) are the most common cancers in men aged between 15 and 44 years and the incidence has increased steeply over the past 30 years. The rapid increase in the incidence, the spatial variation and the evolution of incidence in migrants suggest that environmental risk factors play a role in TGCT aetiology. The purpose of our review is to summarise the current state of knowledge on occupational and environmental factors thought to be associated with TGCT. A systematic literature search of PubMed. All selected articles were quality appraised by two independent researchers using the 'Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale'. After exclusion of duplicate reports, 72 relevant articles were selected; 65 assessed exposure in adulthood, 7 assessed parental exposures and 2 assessed both. Associations with occupation was reported for agricultural workers, construction workers, firemen, policemen, military personnel, as well as workers in paper, plastic or metal industries. Electromagnetic fields, PCBs and pesticides were also suggested. However, results were inconsistent and studies showing positive associations tended to had lower quality ranking using the assessment scale (p=0.02). Current evidence does not allow concluding on existence of any clear association between TGCT and adulthood occupational or environmental exposure. The limitations of the studies may partly explain the inconsistencies observed. The lack of association with adulthood exposure is in line with current hypotheses supporting the prenatal origin of TGCT. Future research should focus on prenatal or early life exposure, as well as combined effect of prenatal and later life exposure. National and international collaborative studies should allow for more adequately powered epidemiological studies. More sophisticated methods for assessing exposure as well as evaluating gene-environment interactions will be necessary to establish clear conclusion.
    PLoS ONE 10/2013; 8(10):e77130. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0077130 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To describe the performance of a lifelong task-based questionnaire (TBQ) in estimating exposures compared with other approaches in the context of a case-control study. A sample of 93 subjects was randomly selected from a lung cancer case-control study corresponding to 497 jobs. For each job, exposure assessments for asbestos and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were obtained by expertise (TBQ expertise) and by algorithm using the TBQ (TBQ algorithm) as well as by expert appraisals based on all available occupational data (REFERENCE expertise) considered to be the gold standard. Additionally, a Job Exposure Matrix (JEM)-based evaluation for asbestos was also obtained. On the 497 jobs, the various evaluations were contrasted using Cohen's κ coefficient of agreement. Additionally, on the total case-control population, the asbestos dose-response relationship based on the TBQ algorithm was compared with the JEM-based assessment. Regarding asbestos, the TBQ-exposure estimates agreed well with the REFERENCE estimate (TBQ expertise: level-weighted κ (lwk)=0.68; TBQ algorithm: lwk=0.61) but less so with the JEM estimate (TBQ expertise: lwk=0.31; TBQ algorithm: lwk=0.26). Regarding PAHs, the agreements between REFERENCE expertise and TBQ were less good (TBQ expertise: lwk=0.43; TBQ algorithm: lwk=0.36). In the case-control study analysis, the dose-response relationship between lung cancer and cumulative asbestos based on the JEM is less steep than with the TBQ-algorithm exposure assessment and statistically non-significant. Asbestos-exposure estimates based on the TBQ were consistent with the REFERENCE expertise and yielded a steeper dose-response relationship than the JEM. For PAHs, results were less clear.
    Occupational and environmental medicine 09/2013; 70(12). DOI:10.1136/oemed-2013-101467 · 3.23 Impact Factor