Oral health promotion interventions on oral reservoirs of staphylococcus aureus: a systematic review

Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, China.
Oral Diseases (Impact Factor: 2.4). 10/2011; 18(3):244-54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2011.01874.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The oral cavity serves as a reservoir of Staphylococcus aureus for infection of the lower respiratory tract and cross-infection to other patients. This systematic review was designed to examine the effectiveness of oral health promotion interventions on this pathogen. The PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for clinical trials assessing the effect of oral health promotion interventions on oral and oropharyngeal carriage of S. aureus. Oral health promotion interventions on oral reservoirs of S. aureus in both systemically healthy and medically compromised groups consisted of oral hygiene interventions only. There was a lack of evidence pertaining to the effectiveness of mechanical oral hygiene interventions against this pathogen. Chlorhexidine delivered in oral hygiene products such as mouthrinses, gels, and sprays appeared to have some utility against S. aureus, although some studies found equivocal effects. There was a dearth of studies investigating the efficacy of other chemical agents. Although many chemical agents contained in oral hygiene products have proven in vitro activity against S. aureus, their clinical effectiveness and potential role as adjuncts or alternative therapies to conventional treatment remain to be confirmed by further high-quality randomized controlled trials.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the activity of oral mouthwashes against biofilm forms of MRSA isolated from the oral cavity and the bloodstream. STUDY DESIGN: The time-kill kinetics efficacy of 7 over-the-counter mouthwashes were tested against 28 clinical MRSA biofilm isolates for 0.5, 1 and 2 min. RESULTS: Treatments of MRSA biofilms formed by oral and bloodstream isolates were not significantly different, with mouthwashes displaying a rapid and modest anti-biofilm effect. None of the biofilm isolates were completely eradicated by the compounds tested, with a maximal killing of only approximately 70% shown by Corsodyl and Peroxyl. Maximum activity of all compounds tested was observed after 0.5 min. Fluorigard showed the poorest overall activity (57% reduction). CONCLUSIONS: MRSA colonize the oral cavity, and are more prevalent in institutionalized persons and the elderly. Over-the-counter mouthwashes are ineffective at killing MRSA biofilms, which has infection control implications.
    03/2013; 115(5). DOI:10.1016/j.oooo.2012.12.014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Australian Government endorsed a national evidence based oral health model when it introduced the first Nursing Home Oral and Dental Health Plan in 2010. Called Better Oral Health in Residential Care, it promotes a multidisciplinary approach with doctors, nurses, care workers and dental professionals sharing responsibility for the four key processes of oral health screening, oral health care planning, daily oral hygiene and access to dental treatment. Frail and dependent residents are most conveniently treated on-site, hence an aged care/dental partnership is encouraged to facilitate the use of portable dental equipment in the delivery of dental care. Currently, few dentists provide services to residential aged care facilities (RACFs), with loss of clinical time in practice, difficulty in providing clinical care in a non-dental environment and lack of referral pathways from the RACFs to the dentists contributing to the problem. The need to establish a model of care involving dental hygienists/oral health therapists in RACFs has merit. Minimal intervention treatment using glass ionomer cement (GIC) and silver fluoride is ideal in aged care. However, GIC has limitation in dry mouths with low pH caused by polypharmacy or disease. Palliative and definitive treatment techniques need to be individualized with consideration of a patient's ability to maintain their own mouths as well as their mental and physical competence. The range of products available to address the oral diseases common to the frail elderly is growing. The oral health care provider is required to establish a preventive regime that is tailored to the patient's needs, is realistic and under revision as the patient's needs change. © 2015 Australian Dental Association.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: “ Deutsch A. Silver fluoride techniques for use in aged-care dentistry. Camperdown: Dental Outlook, 2014:1-23.” The prevention, management and treatment of oral disease, particularly root caries in the elderly who are no longer able to maintain their own oral health due to frailty, disease or dementia is challenging due to the limited interventions available or suitable to treat this cohort of people. Topical silver fluoride/stannous fluoride (AgF+SnF) as a stand alone technique or combined with the Atraumatic Restorative Technique (ART) is particularly suited to treat coronal and root caries in the very frail, those residing in aged care facilities, patients demonstrating challenging behaviours and for the management of rampant caries. Silver fluoride techniques are non threatening, rapid, inexpensive and do not require specialised training. Case studies, some followed for 4 years, are presented showing various new AgF+SnF and silver diamine fluoride (SDF) techniques. Techniques demonstrated are AgF+SnF and immediate restoration; delayed restoration technique being the most versatile and the author's preferred technique, caries control, definitive treatment, palliative care, preventive 3 monthly applications to protect crown, restoration margins ad prevent decay. Silver fluorides are also suited for use with younger high caries risk patients and patient with salivary gland hypofunction.
    2014: 1-23 edited by Graham Craig, 01/2014; Dental Outlook.