Article

Brain enlargement is associated with regression in preschool-age boys with autism spectrum disorders. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical Investigation of Neurodevelopmental Disorders Institute, UC Davis School of Medicine, University of California, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Impact Factor: 9.81). 11/2011; 108(50):20195-200. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1107560108
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Autism is a heterogeneous disorder with multiple behavioral and biological phenotypes. Accelerated brain growth during early childhood is a well-established biological feature of autism. Onset pattern, i.e., early onset or regressive, is an intensely studied behavioral phenotype of autism. There is currently little known, however, about whether, or how, onset status maps onto the abnormal brain growth. We examined the relationship between total brain volume and onset status in a large sample of 2- to 4-y-old boys and girls with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) [n = 53, no regression (nREG); n = 61, regression (REG)] and a comparison group of age-matched typically developing controls (n = 66). We also examined retrospective head circumference measurements from birth through 18 mo of age. We found that abnormal brain enlargement was most commonly found in boys with regressive autism. Brain size in boys without regression did not differ from controls. Retrospective head circumference measurements indicate that head circumference in boys with regressive autism is normal at birth but diverges from the other groups around 4-6 mo of age. There were no differences in brain size in girls with autism (n = 22, ASD; n = 24, controls). These results suggest that there may be distinct neural phenotypes associated with different onsets of autism. For boys with regressive autism, divergence in brain size occurs well before loss of skills is commonly reported. Thus, rapid head growth may be a risk factor for regressive autism.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Tony J Simon, Sep 02, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
181 Views
 · 
65 Downloads
  • Source
    • " phantom was used to derive a 3D image distortion map for each child ' s MRI scan . Distortion correction was carried out on all T1 - weighted images to adjust for hardware - induced var - iation , which has been recognized as an important source of error [ Fox & Freeborough , 1997 ] . These proce - dures have been described in detail previously [ Nordahl et al . , 2011 , 2012 ] ."
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Autism Phenome Project is the largest, single site, longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study of young children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Previous analyses from this cohort have shown that the children with autism have a total brain volume at time 1 (∼3 years of age) that is 6% larger than typically developing (TD) children. This finding is driven primarily by 15% of the boys with ASD that have disproportionate megalencephaly (ASD-DM) or brain size that is 1.5 standard deviations above what would be expected for the child's height. In the current study, cerebral cortical grey matter volume, thickness, and surface area were assayed from MRI scans of 112, 3-year-old boys with ASD and 50 age-matched TD boys. The boys with ASD-DM (n = 17) were analyzed separately from the boys with normal brain size (ASD-N, n = 95). Previous studies of cortical thickness and surface area for ASD children in this age range have come to diametrically different conclusions concerning the significance of cortical thickness vs. surface area. Current analyses indicate that cortical thickness was comparable across the ASD and TD groups. However, surface area was significantly greater in the ASD group compared to the TD group. This result was driven largely by the children with ASD-DM. Even in the ASD-DM group, not all cortical regions demonstrated increased surface area. These results provide strong evidence that the early cortical overgrowth associated with ASD is due primarily to increased surface area and not to increased cortical thickness. Autism Res 2015. © 2015 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2015 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Autism Research 07/2015; DOI:10.1002/aur.1520 · 4.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "A more established picture began to emerge with respect to macro-level measures of brain size, as indexed by measures such as head circumference, brain weight, and magnetic resonance imaging measures of grey and white matter volume. Here data have been presented to suggest larger brain size early in development in ASD compared to controls, characterized as brain 'overgrowth', but a pattern that changes across development, such that by adolescence and adulthood, brain sizes may be smaller than controls (Nordahl et al., 2011; Redcay & Courchesne, 2005; Schumann, Bloss, Carter Barnes, Wideman, Carper et al., 2010; though see Raznahan, Wallace, Antezana, Greenstein, Lenroot et al., 2013, for methodological cautions with respect to population head size norms; Davis, Keeney, Sikela & Hepburn, 2013, that the relationship between head size and disorder is only found in families with a single child with ASD; Nordahl et al., 2011, that larger head size is associated with regressive sub-type of ASD). However, the robustness of early head size differences has recently been questioned. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article outlines the over-pruning hypothesis of autism. The hypothesis originates in a neurocomputational model of the regressive sub-type (Thomas, Knowland & Karmiloff-Smith, 2011a, 2011b). Here we develop a more general version of the over-pruning hypothesis to address heterogeneity in the timing of manifestation of ASD, including new computer simulations which reconcile the different observed developmental trajectories (early onset, late onset, regression) via a single underlying atypical mechanism; and which show how unaffected siblings of individuals with ASD may differ from controls either by inheriting a milder version of the pathological mechanism or by co-inheriting the risk factors without the pathological mechanism. The proposed atypical mechanism involves overly aggressive synaptic pruning in infancy and early childhood, an exaggeration of a normal phase of brain development. We show how the hypothesis generates novel predictions that differ from existing theories of ASD including that (1) the first few months of development in ASD will be indistinguishable from typical, and (2) the earliest atypicalities in ASD will be sensory and motor rather than social. Both predictions gain cautious support from emerging longitudinal studies of infants at-risk of ASD. We review evidence consistent with the over-pruning hypothesis, its relation to other current theories (including C. Frith's under-pruning proposal; C. Frith, 2003, 2004), as well as inconsistent data and current limitations. The hypothesis situates causal accounts of ASD within a framework of protective and risk factors (Newschaffer et al., 2012); clarifies different versions of the broader autism phenotype (i.e. the implication of observed similarities between individuals with autism and their family members); and integrates data from multiple disciplines, including behavioural studies, neuroscience studies, genetics, and intervention studies. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
    Developmental Science 04/2015; DOI:10.1111/desc.12303 · 3.89 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "ces in HC or brain size were found in the female participants . Boys without regressive autism did not differ in HC from TD boys at birth , but diverged from the TD boys and ASD boys with regressive autism between 4 and 6 months of age . Brain volume continued to be abnormally large between 2 and 4 years of age in the boys with regressive autism ( Nordahl et al . , 2011 ) . These results most likely differ from previous studies due to the much larger sample size , comprehensive diagnostic assessments , and the availability of HC data in conjunction with brain volume data obtained via MRI . Gillberg ( 2002 ) provided further evidence that head growth trajectory may differ within ASD . He measured the he"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Head circumference growth in individuals with an Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) has been well characterized in the first two to three years of life and reflects a period of acceleration followed by a period of deceleration when compared with their typically developing (TD) peers. While this altered growth trajectory has been consistently found for head circumference, it is less clear if an abnormal growth trajectory also exists across measures of height and weight. Moreover, most studies have focused on infancy and early childhood, and no longitudinal data have been collected in older children with ASD. This review focuses on the physical growth trajectory of individuals with ASD, and proposes that a general growth dysregulation is present in ASD, and that an endophenotype within ASD may exist that is characteristic of extreme overgrowth. Two possible explanations for a general growth dysregulation are suggested: (1) a connective tissue disorder, which is frequently associated with increased height and disproportionate body ratios; and (2) a dysregulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, which regulates growth hormones. The existence of a general growth dysregulation, and possible endophenotype, may serve as a potential biological marker in ASD.
    Developmental Review 02/2015; 36. DOI:10.1016/j.dr.2015.02.001 · 3.23 Impact Factor
Show more