Distal Landing Zone Open Fenestration Facilitates Endovascular Elephant Trunk Completion and False Lumen Thrombosis

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
The Annals of thoracic surgery (Impact Factor: 3.65). 12/2011; 92(6):2078-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.08.018
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Controversy surrounds the endovascular treatment of chronic dissection because of inconsistent remodeling of the aorta. The purpose of this study was to assess efficacy and safety of a novel technique for repairing aneurysmal change associated with chronic descending aortic dissection.
From July 2007 to April 2011, 24 patients with descending aortic aneurysmal change, consequent to previously repaired ascending aortic dissection or medically treated descending dissection, underwent combined open first-stage elephant trunk (ET) insertion and fenestration of the descending aorta intimal flap. Second-stage ET endovascular completion was performed with the index operation in 4 patients and later in 20 patients (median, 62 days). Repair was elective in 14 patients and urgent in 10 patients. Concomitant procedures were aortic valve replacement in 3 patients and coronary revascularization in 3 patients, and 16 procedures were reoperations. Chart review and analysis of 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) scans were performed. Imaging follow-up was complete in 89% of patients during a median of 18 months (interquartile range [IQR], 10 to 28 months).
Technical success was achieved in all patients. Moderate reduction in aortic size occurred in most patients, with no retrograde false lumen flow. Late reintervention was required in 5 patients: endovascular for distal type I endoleak in 2 patients, type II endoleak in 1 patient, pseudoaneurysm of the abdominal aorta in 1 patient, and 1 open repair for aneurysm of the untreated distal segment in 1 patient. One patient died of pulmonary embolism on postoperative day 19 after 1-stage repair (4.0%) and 1 patient (4%) had a transient stroke, but there was no renal failure, respiratory failure, or permanent spinal cord injury. Median length of stay was 13 days (IQR, 8 to 16 days) after first-stage ET and 8 days (IQR, 5 to 12 days) after endovascular ET completion. One patient died during a mean of 23 ± 11 months of follow-up.
Open distal landing zone fenestration during first-stage ET facilitates endovascular completion for aneurysm associated with chronic distal dissection. Early results suggest that this technique is efficacious in eliminating retrograde false lumen filling and promoting aortic size reduction and is safe for patients.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An aging population, increased awareness, high-resolution imaging, and improving access to care all mean that more people are being diagnosed with acute aortic dissection. A better understanding of the role of initial medical therapy, improved surgical techniques, and the addition of endovascular approaches to the treatment algorithm, have resulted in more patients surviving the acute phase of disease. During the chronic phase, patients with residual dissection are challenged by the competing risks of reoperation or death. Open repair for chronic type-B dissection can be performed safely but is a relatively morbid operation. For this reason, surgery is often postponed until patients develop very late complications. Despite encouraging results for thoracic endovascular aortic repair of acute type-B dissection, chronic type-B dissection poses unique challenges that make application of endovascular technology more difficult. As our understanding of the disease and its natural history evolves, the ways in which these 2 methods of treatment complement each other need to be better understood. The benefits and limitations of each therapy, and how and when to apply each in the setting of chronic distal dissection, are discussed. Copyright © 2015 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Survivors of ascending aortic dissection repair frequently require downstream aortic interventions. Because of a paucity of data, we assessed early and long-term outcomes, and risk factors, of these distal procedures. From January 1993 to January 2011, 305 patients underwent 429 distal aortic interventions after acute type A (95% DeBakey type I) dissection repair performed 3.8 years earlier (median); 11% of interventions used an endovascular approach. Maximum aortic size was 5.9 ± 1.3 cm. Median follow-up was 3.6 years. Hospital mortality was 6.1%. Risk factors included graft infection, concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting, combined open arch and descending procedures, and lower distal anastomotic site. Within 10 years, the probability of patients undergoing a reintervention was 38%, with a cumulative incidence of 55 per 100 patients; however, 40 (9.3%) were stage-II elephant trunks. Patients with larger aortic diameters distal to the initial repair, and a stage-I elephant trunk, were more likely to undergo distal interventions. Survival was 65% at 10 years. Higher body mass index, a longer time between reinterventions, graft infection, combined open arch and descending procedures, and lower distal anastomosis sites were risk factors. The extent of aorta replaced was not associated with increased morbidity or mortality, unless it involved a combined open arch and descending aorta procedure. Distal interventions after ascending aortic dissection repair are feasible, but they are associated with early morbidity and subsequent reinterventions. Rigorous follow-up with early reintervention is important for improving short- and long-term outcomes. An extended hybrid endovascular repair for initial dissection warrants study. Copyright © 2015 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Persistent retrograde false lumen perfusion is a common mode of failure after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for chronic dissection. Objectives were to describe a novel endovascular approach for false lumen occlusion and assess outcomes. From 2009 to 2013, 21 patients (mean age, 64 ± 11 years) with chronic thoracoabdominal dissection underwent adjunctive false lumen embolization using covered stent devices for persistent retrograde perfusion. Eight patients had type B dissection, 13 had residual dissection after prior type A repair, and all were deemed high risk for open operation. False lumen embolization in 17 patients was an adjunct at the initial TEVAR or extension, including two as elephant trunk completion. In the other four, this was done as an isolated procedure, and three had previously undergone TEVAR sparing the celiac artery. Covered stent devices included iliac plugs in 18, nitinol embolization plugs in two, and occluded stent graft in one. More than one device was used in 15 patients. There was one hospital death due to left subclavian artery aneurysm rupture but no patient had stroke, paraplegia, myocardial infarction, or renal failure. Mean follow-up was 25 ± 19 months. During surveillance computed tomography imaging, false lumen thrombosis was noted in all patients, but four required further embolization because the thrombosis was incomplete. Mean maximum aortic diameter decreased from 64 ± 14 to 59 ± 15 mm. There was one late death from intracranial hemorrhage and no aortic ruptures. Adjunctive false lumen embolization with a covered stent device promotes thrombosis and remodeling after stent grafting the true lumen for chronic dissection. Further study of this strategy is warranted. Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Journal of Vascular Surgery 12/2014; 60(6):1507-13. DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2014.08.094 · 2.98 Impact Factor


Available from
Nov 29, 2014