Mindful attention reduces neural and self-reported cue-induced craving in smokers

526 W. Washington Ave Apt. 1A, Madison, WI, 53703, USA. .
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (Impact Factor: 7.37). 11/2011; 8(1). DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsr076
Source: PubMed


An emerging body of research suggests that mindfulness-based interventions may be beneficial for smoking cessation and the treatment of other addictive disorders. One way that mindfulness may facilitate smoking cessation is through the reduction of craving to smoking cues. The present work considers whether mindful attention can reduce self-reported and neural markers of cue-induced craving in treatment seeking smokers. Forty-seven (n = 47) meditation-naïve treatment-seeking smokers (12-h abstinent from smoking) viewed and made ratings of smoking and neutral images while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Participants were trained and instructed to view these images passively or with mindful attention. Results indicated that mindful attention reduced self-reported craving to smoking images, and reduced neural activity in a craving-related region of subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC). Moreover, a psychophysiological interaction analysis revealed that mindful attention reduced functional connectivity between sgACC and other craving-related regions compared to passively viewing smoking images, suggesting that mindfulness may decouple craving neurocircuitry when viewing smoking cues. These results provide an initial indication that mindful attention may describe a 'bottom-up' attention to one's present moment experience in ways that can help reduce subjective and neural reactivity to smoking cues in smokers.

Download full-text


Available from: Golnaz Tabibnia,
  • Source
    • "Furthermore, high-arousal situations impair adolescent decision-making abilities much more than those in adults (Steinberg, 2005). These contingencies suggest that practices like mindfulness, which enhance executive functioning (Oberle, Schonert-Reichl, Lawlor, & Thomson, 2012; Westbrook et al., 2013), could support prefrontal brain structure development in adolescents. Arguably, such training could also enable adolescents to manage excessive levels of negative emotions like anxiety, which interfere with working memory and attention (Shackman et al., 2006; Shackman, Maxwell, McMenamin, Greischar, & Davidson, 2011) and impact on well-being and academic performance (Kaplan, Liu, & Kaplan, 2005). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mindfulness training is increasingly being introduced in schools, yet studies examining its impact on the developing brain are scarce. A neurodevelopmental perspective on mindfulness has been advocated as a powerful tool to enhance our understanding of underlying neurocognitive changes with implications for developmental well-being research and the implementation of mindfulness in education. To stimulate more research in developmental cognitive neuroscience of mindfulness, this paper outlines possible indexes of mindfulness-based change in adolescence with a focus on event-related brain potentials (ERP) markers. We provide methodological recommendations for future studies, and offer examples of research paradigms. We discuss how mindfulness practice could impact on the development of prefrontal brain structures, and enhance attention control and emotion regulation skills in adolescents, impacting in turn on their self-regulation and coping skills. We highlight advantages of ERP methodology in neurodevelopmental research of mindfulness. It is proposed that research using established experimental tasks targeting ERP components such as the Contingent Negative Variability, N200, Error-Related Negativity and error Positivity, P300, and the Late Positive Potential could elucidate developmentally salient shifts in neural plasticity of the adolescent brain induced by mindfulness practice.
    Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 03/2015; 15(3). DOI:10.3758/s13415-015-0354-7 · 3.29 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "self-regulation (Chambers et al., 2009; Taylor et al., 2010; van den Hurk et al., 2010; Hölzel et al., 2011b; Vago and Silbersweig, 2012; Chiesa et al., 2013; Westbrook et al., 2013). Top-down strategies are thought to occur in more novice meditators, where there is an emphasis on attentional control and thus, top-down executive mechanisms. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Research suggesting the beneficial effects of yoga on myriad aspects of psychological health has proliferated in recent years, yet there is currently no overarching framework by which to understand yoga's potential beneficial effects. Here we provide a theoretical framework and systems-based network model of yoga that focuses on integration of top-down and bottom-up forms of self-regulation. We begin by contextualizing yoga in historical and contemporary settings, and then detail how specific components of yoga practice may affect cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and autonomic output under stress through an emphasis on interoception and bottom-up input, resulting in physical and psychological health. The model describes yoga practice as a comprehensive skillset of synergistic process tools that facilitate bidirectional feedback and integration between high- and low-level brain networks, and afferent and re-afferent input from interoceptive processes (somatosensory, viscerosensory, chemosensory). From a predictive coding perspective we propose a shift to perceptual inference for stress modulation and optimal self-regulation. We describe how the processes that sub-serve self-regulation become more automatized and efficient over time and practice, requiring less effort to initiate when necessary and terminate more rapidly when no longer needed. To support our proposed model, we present the available evidence for yoga affecting self-regulatory pathways, integrating existing constructs from behavior theory and cognitive neuroscience with emerging yoga and meditation research. This paper is intended to guide future basic and clinical research, specifically targeting areas of development in the treatment of stress-mediated psychological disorders.
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 09/2014; 8:770. DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00770 · 3.63 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Using a data glove (Psychology Software Tools, Pittsburgh, PA), participants then had 4 s to rate their craving and 4 s to rate their negative emotion, on scales from 1 (weak craving or weakly negative) to 5 (strong craving or strongly negative), before viewing a fixation cross for 2 s (rest). There were three types of pictures (distressing, smoking , and neutral; see Westbrook et al., 2011, and the Methods: Pictures in the Reappraisal Tasks section in the SOM-U in the Supplemental Material available online.) The neutral pictures were always preceded by the instruction " Look " ; the smoking and distressing pictures were preceded by one of three instructions ( " Look, " " Re-Interpret, " or " Mindfully Attend " ). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It has been posited that self-regulation of behaviors, emotions, and temptations may all rely on a common resource. Recent reviews suggest this common resource may include the inferior frontal cortex (IFC). However, to our knowledge no single functional neuroimaging study has tested this hypothesis. We obtained fMRI scans as 25 abstinent treatment-seeking cigarette smokers completed motor, affective, and craving self-control tasks before smoking cessation treatment. We identified two regions in left IFC and a region in pre-supplementary motor area (preSMA) that were commonly activated in all three tasks. Further, PPI analyses suggest that IFC may involve dissociable pathways in each self-control domain. Specifically, the IFC showed negative functional connectivity with large portions of the thalamus and precentral gyrus during motor stopping, with the insula and other portions of the thalamus during craving regulation, and potentially with a small limbic region during emotion regulation. We discuss implications for understanding self-control mechanisms.
    09/2014; 2(5):611-619. DOI:10.1177/2167702614522037
Show more