Physicians' Needs in Coping With Emotional Stressors The Case for Peer Support

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill.: 1960) (Impact Factor: 4.93). 11/2011; 147(3):212-7. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.312
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To design an evidence-based intervention to address physician distress, based on the attitudes toward support among physicians at our hospital.
A 56-item survey was administered to a convenience sample (n = 108) of resident and attending physicians at surgery, emergency medicine, and anesthesiology departmental conferences at a large tertiary care academic hospital.
Likelihood of seeking support, perceived barriers, awareness of available services, sources of support, and experience with stress.
Among the resident and attending physicians, 79% experienced either a serious adverse patient event and/or a traumatic personal event within the preceding year. Willingness to seek support was reported for legal situations (72%), involvement in medical errors (67%), adverse patient events (63%), substance abuse (67%), physical illness (62%), mental illness (50%), and interpersonal conflict at work (50%). Barriers included lack of time (89%), uncertainty or difficulty with access (69%), concerns about lack of confidentiality (68%), negative impact on career (68%), and stigma (62%). Physician colleagues were the most popular potential sources of support (88%), outnumbering traditional mechanisms such as the employee assistance program (29%) and mental health professionals (48%). Based on these results, a one-on-one peer physician support program was incorporated into support services at our hospital.
Despite the prevalence of stressful experiences and the desire for support among physicians, established services are underused. As colleagues are the most acceptable sources of support, we advocate peer support as the most effective way to address this sensitive but important issue.

Download full-text


Available from: Megan L Fix, Sep 28, 2015
33 Reads
  • Medical Education 12/2012; 46(12):1149-51. DOI:10.1111/medu.12074 · 3.20 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The hollow fiber-based stirring extraction bar liquid-liquid microextraction was applied to the extraction of hormones, including 17-α-ethinylestradiol, 17-α-estradiol, estriol, 17-β-estradiol, estrone, 17-α-hydroxyprogesterone, medroxyprogesterone, progesterone and norethisterone acetate, in milk. The present method has the advantages of both hollow fiber-liquid phase microextraction and stirring bar sorptive extraction. The stirring extraction bar was used as both the stirring bar of microextraction, and extractor of the analytes, which can make extraction, clean-up and concentration be carried out in one step. When the extraction was completed, the stirring extraction bar was easy isolated from the extraction system with the magnet. Several experimental parameters, including the type of extraction solvent, the number of hollow stirring extraction bar, extraction time, stirring speed, ionic strength, and desorption conditions were investigated and optimized. The analytes in the extract were derived and determined by gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Under optimal experimental conditions, good linearity was observed in the range of 0.20-20.00ngmL(-1). The limits of detection and quantification were in the range of 0.02-0.06ngmL(-1) and 0.07-0.19ngmL(-1), respectively. The present method was applied to the analysis of milk samples, and the recoveries of analytes were in the range of 93.6-104.6% with the relative standard deviations ranging from 1.6% to 6.2% (n=5). The results showed that the present method was a rapid and feasible method for the determination of hormones in milk samples.
    Analytica chimica acta 08/2013; 790:39-46. DOI:10.1016/j.aca.2013.06.035 · 4.51 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Moral distress is the experience of cognitive-emotional dissonance that arises when one feels compelled to act contrary to one's moral requirements. Moral distress is common, but under-recognized in medical education and training, and this relative inattention may undermine educators' efforts to promote empathy, ethical practice, and professionalism. Moral distress should be recognized as a feature of the clinical landscape, and addressed in conjunction with the related concerns of negative role modeling and the goals and efficacy of medical ethics curricula.
    Journal of General Internal Medicine 10/2013; 29(2). DOI:10.1007/s11606-013-2665-0 · 3.42 Impact Factor
Show more