Physicians' needs in coping with emotional stressors: the case for peer support.

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill.: 1960) (Impact Factor: 4.32). 11/2011; 147(3):212-7. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.312
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To design an evidence-based intervention to address physician distress, based on the attitudes toward support among physicians at our hospital.
A 56-item survey was administered to a convenience sample (n = 108) of resident and attending physicians at surgery, emergency medicine, and anesthesiology departmental conferences at a large tertiary care academic hospital.
Likelihood of seeking support, perceived barriers, awareness of available services, sources of support, and experience with stress.
Among the resident and attending physicians, 79% experienced either a serious adverse patient event and/or a traumatic personal event within the preceding year. Willingness to seek support was reported for legal situations (72%), involvement in medical errors (67%), adverse patient events (63%), substance abuse (67%), physical illness (62%), mental illness (50%), and interpersonal conflict at work (50%). Barriers included lack of time (89%), uncertainty or difficulty with access (69%), concerns about lack of confidentiality (68%), negative impact on career (68%), and stigma (62%). Physician colleagues were the most popular potential sources of support (88%), outnumbering traditional mechanisms such as the employee assistance program (29%) and mental health professionals (48%). Based on these results, a one-on-one peer physician support program was incorporated into support services at our hospital.
Despite the prevalence of stressful experiences and the desire for support among physicians, established services are underused. As colleagues are the most acceptable sources of support, we advocate peer support as the most effective way to address this sensitive but important issue.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mentorship is an increasingly popular innovation from business and industry that is being applied in health-care contexts. This paper explores the concept of mentorship for newly appointed physicians in their first substantive senior post, and specifically its utilization to enhance patient safety. Semi-structured face to face and telephone interviews with Medical Directors (n = 5), Deputy Medical Directors (n = 4), and Clinical Directors (n = 6) from 9 acute NHS Trusts in the Yorkshire and Humber region in the north of England. A focused thematic analysis was used. A number of beneficial outcomes were associated with mentorship for newly appointed physicians including greater personal and professional support, organizational commitment, and general well-being. Providing newly appointed senior physicians with support through mentorship was considered to enhance the safety of patient care. Mentorship may prevent or reduce active failures, be used to identify threats in the local working environment, and in the longer term, address latent threats to safety within the organization by encouraging a healthier safety culture. Offering mentorship to all newly appointed physicians in their first substantive post in health care may be a useful strategy to support the development of their clinical, professional, and personal skills in this transitional period that may also enhance the safety of patient care.
    Journal of Patient Safety 02/2014;
  • Medical Education 12/2012; 46(12):1149-51. · 3.55 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The risk of lawsuits causes surgeons stress and is associated with defensive medicine. It is possible that some surgeons withdraw from surgery due to malpractice lawsuits, although the actual impact of lawsuits is not clear. This study evaluated changes in work and medical practices involved in lawsuits, as well as support they receive. Materials and methods A total of 115 surgeons who had been involved in lawsuits in Japan were eligible to participate. Participants were surveyed about changes in work due to lawsuits, the influence of lawsuits on medical care, defensive medicine, and their opinions on support they received. Results A total of 30 surveys were collected. Six (21%) surgeons changed work; five had lost their lawsuits and the remaining had settlement. Surgeons felt that lawsuit imposed a time burden (100%) and caused emotional strain (96%). Surgeons made a number of conscious changes to their medical care after lawsuit, including over care (27%) and a hesitation to use high-risk treatments (39%). They had positive opinions of support they received from legal counsel (89%), hospital director (73%), supervisors (65%), and colleagues (57%). Surgeons who changed work were significantly more likely to engage in defensive medicine, including over care and hesitation, than were surgeons who had not changed work. Support from legal counsel was negatively correlated with over care and hesitation. Conclusions Given the significant influence of lawsuits on surgeons’ practice, medical institutions should provide support to surgeons. Future research is needed to confirm whether legal counsel may prevent defensive medicine.
    Journal of Surgical Research 08/2014; · 2.02 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 29, 2014