Safety and predictors of complications of renal biopsy in the outpatient setting. Clin Nephrol

Department of Renal Medicine, The Canberra Hospital, Australia.
Clinical nephrology (Impact Factor: 1.13). 12/2011; 76(6):464-9. DOI: 10.5414/CN107128
Source: PubMed


It has been recommended that patients should be admitted for 24 h of observation after percutaneous renal biopsy. This may be performed in the ambulatory outpatient setting, though its safety in this setting is an area of debate. We aim to demonstrate the safety of biopsy in the ambulatory outpatient setting.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of 475 biopsies performed in the ambulatory outpatient setting to examine safety and risk factors for complications. Transplant and native kidney biopsies performed at the Canberra Hospital, a tertiary referral university hospital, from 2006 until 2010 were included. Patients were observed for 6 h before discharge. Study outcomes were minor complications, defined as pain, hemorrhage or postural hypotension; or major complications, defined as complications requiring therapeutic intervention including blood product transfusion.
The overall complication rate was 8.2%. There were 33 minor complications (6.9%) and 6 major complications (1.3%). All complications occurring outside the period of observation were safely managed. Significant predictors of any complication was hemoglobin (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01 - 1.06), kidney size (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.89 - 0.98), and proceduralist.
Percutaneous renal biopsy is safe in the ambulatory outpatient setting. Establishing ongoing quality assurance programs may be helpful in early identification of operator-dependent factors.

8 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Percutaneous kidney biopsy is an integral part of a nephrologist's practice. It has helped to define nephrology as a subspecialty. When indicated, it is a necessary procedure to help patients, as it allows for diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic information. Although very safe, this procedure can give rise to complications, mainly related to bleeding. Since its development in the 1950s, modifications have been made to the approach and the technique, which have improved the diagnostic yield while keeping it a safe procedure. Alterations to the standard approach may be necessary if risk factors for bleeding are present. In addition, obesity, pregnancy, and solitary kidney biopsy are all special circumstances that change the procedure itself or the risk of the procedure. Today, kidney biopsy is a vital procedure for the nephrologist: clinically relevant, safe, and effective.
    Advances in chronic kidney disease 05/2012; 19(3):179-87. DOI:10.1053/j.ackd.2012.04.003 · 2.05 Impact Factor
  • Source

    Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 05/2012; 27(8):3016-7. DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfs147 · 3.58 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To report the preliminary outcomes of a novel renorrhaphy surgical technique, V-hilar suture (VHS), developed and implemented at our institution to manage hilar masses chosen for robotic partial nephrectomy. Of all patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy for a single renal tumor from June 2007 to October 2011, 15 had hilar renal tumors. Of these 15 patients, only 5 had been considered for VHS renorrhaphy and were compared with the rest. The patients' demographic and perioperative data were recorded. They were followed up postoperatively for renal function. The VHS renorrhaphy was obtained by first having inner layer sutures to reshape the renal parenchyma with medialization of the central-lateral border of the resection bed. Next, a continuous horizontal mattress suture was used to reapproximate the renal capsule. The main patient and tumor characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups. No difference was found in terms of operating room time or warm ischemia time. A trend was noted in favor of the VHS group for estimated blood loss (250 vs 575 mL; P = .137), postoperative complications (2 vs 6; P = .056), and hospital stay (2.6 vs 6.6 days; P = .157). No significant difference was found in the postoperative changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate between the 2 groups. The preliminary outcomes of the present surgical technique have demonstrated its safety and efficacy. It might represent a valuable asset for robotic surgeons treating complex hilar renal tumors. Additional larger studies with longer follow-up are required to confirm these encouraging findings.
    Urology 06/2012; 80(2):466-71. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2012.03.058 · 2.19 Impact Factor
Show more