Conditional Deletion of MSX Homeobox Genes in the Uterus Inhibits Blastocyst Implantation by Altering Uterine Receptivity

Division of Reproductive Sciences, Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
Developmental Cell (Impact Factor: 10.37). 11/2011; 21(6):1014-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.09.010
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT An effective bidirectional communication between an implantation-competent blastocyst and the receptive uterus is a prerequisite for mammalian reproduction. The blastocyst will implant only when this molecular cross-talk is established. Here we show that the muscle segment homeobox gene (Msh) family members Msx1 and Msx2, which are two highly conserved genes critical for epithelial-mesenchymal interactions during development, also play crucial roles in embryo implantation. Loss of Msx1/Msx2 expression correlates with altered uterine luminal epithelial cell polarity and affects E-cadherin/β-catenin complex formation through the control of Wnt5a expression. Application of Wnt5a in vitro compromised blastocyst invasion and trophoblast outgrowth on cultured uterine epithelial cells. The finding that Msx1/Msx2 genes are critical for conferring uterine receptivity and readiness to implantation could have clinical significance, because compromised uterine receptivity is a major cause of pregnancy failure in IVF programs.

Download full-text


Available from: Jeeyeon Cha, Mar 15, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Luminal closure and embryo apposition are essential for blastocyst attachment during early pregnancy. In our preliminary microarray results (unpublished data), sodium-potassium adenosine triphosphatase (Na/K-ATPase) b1 (Atp1b1) was highly expressed in mouse uterus on Days 3 and 4 of pregnancy. However, expression and regulation of Atp1b1 in the mammalian uterus during early pregnancy are unknown. Using in situ hybridization, a strong level of Atp1b1 mRNA was detected in luminal epithelial cells on Days 3 and 4 of pregnancy (Day 1 ¼ day of vaginal plug). The expression pattern of FXYD domain-containing ion transport regulator 4 (Fxyd4) was similar to that of Atp1b1. Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction confirmed the high expression level of Atp1b1 mRNA. Compared with Day 1, the mRNA level of Atp1b1 on Days 3 and 4 increased by 3.5 AE 0.5 and 4.5 AE 0.5 fold, respectively. When the embryo invaded through epithelial cells into the maternal stromal compartment on day 5, Atp1b1 expression decreased to a basal level. Progesterone stimulated Atp1b1 expression by 2.8 AE 1 fold compared with oil in ovariectomized mice at 24 hours after treatment. Expression of Atp1b1 was further upregulated to 4 AE 0.4 fold by estrogen and progesterone. Based on time-course study, progesterone rapidly induced Atp1b1 expression at 6 and 12 hours (13.7 AE 0.5 and 16.6 AE 1.4, respectively); furthermore, this upregulation was blocked by RU486 (progesterone receptor antagonist). Transcription activity of the Atp1b1 promoter was (Day 1 ¼ day of vaginal plug) stimulated by CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta (Cebpb). In conclusion, Atp1b1 was highly expressed in luminal epithelium during peri-implantation and upre-gulated by progesterone.
    Theriogenology 02/2013; · 1.85 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Uterine receptivity is defined as a limited time period during which the uterus enters into an appropriately differentiated state that is ready for the initiation of implantation by competent blastocysts. Although various cellular aspects and molecular pathways involved in uterine receptivity have been identified by gene expression studies and genetically engineered mouse models, a comprehensive understanding of the window of uterine receptivity is still missing. This review focuses on the recent progress in this area, with particular focus on the molecular basis of stroma-epithelia dialogue and cross-talk between the blastocyst and the uterus during implantation. A better understanding of underlying mechanisms governing the window of uterine receptivity is hoped to generate new strategies to correct implantation failure and to improve pregnancy rates in women. Mol. Reprod. Dev. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Molecular Reproduction and Development 01/2013; 80(1). DOI:10.1002/mrd.22118 · 2.68 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Implantation is a process of the first feto-maternal encounter in the uterus. A competent blastocyst and a receptive uterus are critical for successful implantation. For an acquisition of uterine receptivity, the following conditions need to be satisfied in the uterine environments: the endometrial preparation with stromal proliferation and epithelial differentiation in the pre-receptive phase and proper interactions between the uterus and blastocyst later in the phase. Focusing on these points and primarily referring to the mouse in vivo evidence, this review article has shown detailed molecular mechanisms for successful implantation.
    Reproductive Medicine and Biology 10/2013; DOI:10.1007/s12522-013-0153-1