Article

Effectiveness of strategies for the management and/or prevention of hypothermia within the adult perioperative environment.

The Joanna Briggs Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare 12/2011; 9(4):337-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00227.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Inadvertent hypothermia is common in patients undergoing surgical procedures with a reported prevalence of perioperative hypothermia ranging from 50% to 90%. Hypothermia within the perioperative environment may have many undesired physiological effects that are associated with postoperative morbidity. There are different options for treating and/or preventing hypothermia within the adult perioperative environment, which include active and passive warming methods. This systematic review was undertaken to provide comprehensive evidence on the most effective strategies for prevention and management of inadvertent hypothermia in the perioperative environment.
The objective of this review was to identify the most effective methods for the treatment and/or preventions of hypothermia in intraoperative or postoperative patients.
Adult patients ≥ 18 years of age, who underwent any type of surgery were included in this review. Types of interventions included were any type of linen or cover, aluminium foil wraps, forced-air warming devices, radiant warming devices and fluid warming devices. This review considered all identified prospective studies that used a clearly described process for randomisation, and/or included a control group. The primary outcome of interest was change in core body temperature.
Two independent reviewers assessed methodological validity of papers selected for retrieval and any disagreements were resolved through discussion.
Nineteen studies with a combined 1451 patients who underwent different surgical procedures were included in this review. Meta-analysis was not possible. Forced-air warming in pregnant women scheduled for caesarean delivery under regional anaesthesia prevented maternal and foetal hypothermia. Intravenous and irrigating fluids warmed (38-40°C) to a temperature higher than that of room temperature by different fluid warming devices (both dry and water heated) proved significantly beneficial to patients in terms of stable haemodynamic variables, and higher core temperature at the end of the surgery. Water garment warmer was significantly (P < 0.05) effective than forced-air warming in maintaining intraoperative normothermia in orthotopic liver transplantation patients. Extra warming with forced air compared to routine thermal care was effective in reducing the incidence of surgical wound infections and postoperative cardiac complications. Passive warming with reflective heating blankets or elastic bandages wrapped around the legs tightly were found to be ineffective in reducing the incidence or magnitude of hypothermia.
There are significant benefits associated with forced-air warming. Evidence supports commencement of active warming preoperatively and monitoring it throughout the intraoperative period. Single strategies such as forced-air warming were more effective than passive warming; however, combined strategies, including preoperative commencement, use of warmed fluids plus forced-air warming as other active strategies were more effective in vulnerable groups (age or durations of surgeries).

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Craig S Lockwood, Oct 01, 2014
6 Followers
 · 
178 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Décrire les particularités de l’hémorragie du post-partum (HPP) associée à la césarienne, les modalités du diagnostic et les spécificités obstétricales et anesthésiques de la prise en charge.
    Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 11/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.jgyn.2014.10.004 · 0.62 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: perioperative hypothermia is a common finding in the rooms of surgery and it simultaneously is underestimated. The biggest heat loss in patients under general anesthesia is presented importatit factor for the development of postoperative complications for what, preserve the body temperature improves the quality of anesthesia and it is cost-effective. Objetive: to quantify the efficiency and safety of low density polyethylene (LDPE) plastic bags to prevent hypothermia in adult patients submitted surgery under general anesthesia. Methods: it is a randomized, prospective, single blind, controlled clinical trial camed out in the Hospital Universitario del Caribe of Cartagena (since june 2012 to may, 2013). 107 patients, scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia, were divided in two groups: [A] Intervention grupo with coverage of 75% of the body surface with low density polyethylene plastic bags, in surgeries that were allowing this coverage. [B] Control group, with conventional management without coverage. In both grups, contirwous measurement of the temperature was done, the proportions of outcome variables between the two groups were compared by means of chi2 and the Mann- Whitney U test. In adittion, the relative risk (RR9 with their confidence intervals of 95% for the use of the intervention in the reduction of the hypothermia was estimated. A p valve <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: the temperature at the end of the surgery was lower in the control group than in the intervention group (p<0.0001). The use of plastic bags had RR=0.48 (CI 0.33- 0.69) for reduction of hypothermia and RR=0.079 (CI 95% 0.011-0.58) for reduction of chills. In the group with plastic bags the appearance of chills and hypothermia was less frequent (p=0.0002). None of the groups presented adverse effects. Conclusion: the adequate coverage of minimum 75% of the body surface with plastic bags, in patients submitted to surgery under general anesthesia, reducesin a safe way the possibility of hypothermia. Rev.cienc.biomed. 2014;5(1):23-28 KEYWORDS Body temperature; Hypothermia; Anesthesia general; Surgical procedures.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: The study was conducted to identify preoperative factors affecting the intraoperative core body temperature in abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. Design: This study was performed through prospective descriptive research design. Setting: The setting was a 1300-bed university hospital in Incheon, South Korea. Samples: The sample consisted of 147 patients who had undergone elective abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. Methods: Age, weight, and height were collected on a preoperative visit to general unit, and body mass index, body surface area, and total body fat were calculated. The basal preoperative core body temperature (CBT), preoperative blood pressure, and heart rate were measured. Core body temperature was again measured at 1, 2, and 3 hours following general anesthesia. Results: Predictive factors of intraoperative hypothermia of less than 36 degrees C were preoperative CBT (beta=.44), weight (beta=.41), preoperative heart rate (beta=.20), and age (beta=-.13) at 1 hour after anesthesia (R-2 = 0.658, F = 68.3, P<.001); preoperative CBT (beta = .33), weight beta = .37), preoperative heart rate beta = .22), and age (beta = -.24) at 2 hours after anesthesia (R-2 = 0.631, F = 60.8, P < .001); and age (beta = .34), weight (beta = .36), preoperative CBT (beta = .30), and preoperative heart rate (beta = .20) at 3 hours after anesthesia (R-2 = 0.665, F = 70.6, P < .001). Conclusion: Low preoperative body temperature and low weight seem to be risk factors of intraoperative hypothermia during 2 hours after anesthesia and advanced age and low weight at 3 hours following anesthesia. Implications: We recommend prewarming and intraoperative warming through forced air warming devices and covering a patient with a warm blanket during transportation. This procedure is necessary for the abdominal surgical patients of advanced age with low weight and duration of general anesthesia to last more than 1 hour.
    Clinical nurse specialist CNS 09/2014; 28(5):268-276. DOI:10.1097/NUR.0000000000000069 · 0.90 Impact Factor