Effectiveness of strategies for the management and/or prevention of hypothermia within the adult perioperative environment.

The Joanna Briggs Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare 12/2011; 9(4):337-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00227.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Inadvertent hypothermia is common in patients undergoing surgical procedures with a reported prevalence of perioperative hypothermia ranging from 50% to 90%. Hypothermia within the perioperative environment may have many undesired physiological effects that are associated with postoperative morbidity. There are different options for treating and/or preventing hypothermia within the adult perioperative environment, which include active and passive warming methods. This systematic review was undertaken to provide comprehensive evidence on the most effective strategies for prevention and management of inadvertent hypothermia in the perioperative environment.
The objective of this review was to identify the most effective methods for the treatment and/or preventions of hypothermia in intraoperative or postoperative patients.
Adult patients ≥ 18 years of age, who underwent any type of surgery were included in this review. Types of interventions included were any type of linen or cover, aluminium foil wraps, forced-air warming devices, radiant warming devices and fluid warming devices. This review considered all identified prospective studies that used a clearly described process for randomisation, and/or included a control group. The primary outcome of interest was change in core body temperature.
Two independent reviewers assessed methodological validity of papers selected for retrieval and any disagreements were resolved through discussion.
Nineteen studies with a combined 1451 patients who underwent different surgical procedures were included in this review. Meta-analysis was not possible. Forced-air warming in pregnant women scheduled for caesarean delivery under regional anaesthesia prevented maternal and foetal hypothermia. Intravenous and irrigating fluids warmed (38-40°C) to a temperature higher than that of room temperature by different fluid warming devices (both dry and water heated) proved significantly beneficial to patients in terms of stable haemodynamic variables, and higher core temperature at the end of the surgery. Water garment warmer was significantly (P < 0.05) effective than forced-air warming in maintaining intraoperative normothermia in orthotopic liver transplantation patients. Extra warming with forced air compared to routine thermal care was effective in reducing the incidence of surgical wound infections and postoperative cardiac complications. Passive warming with reflective heating blankets or elastic bandages wrapped around the legs tightly were found to be ineffective in reducing the incidence or magnitude of hypothermia.
There are significant benefits associated with forced-air warming. Evidence supports commencement of active warming preoperatively and monitoring it throughout the intraoperative period. Single strategies such as forced-air warming were more effective than passive warming; however, combined strategies, including preoperative commencement, use of warmed fluids plus forced-air warming as other active strategies were more effective in vulnerable groups (age or durations of surgeries).

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The current focus on maintaining normal body temperature in the operating room makes the use of patient warming devices routine—or even mandatory—in many hospitals. Forced air warming devices such as the Bair Hugger (3M Healthcare, St. Paul, Minnesota) maintain or increase core temperature in patients during the perioperative period, with benefits that include reduced surgical wound infections, maintenance of normal coagulation, and faster discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU)1-5. However, some recent literature has raised concerns regarding a possible increased risk of deep surgical site infections specifically associated with the use of the forced air warming systems in the orthopaedic operating room5-12. One concern is that a convective device could disrupt unidirectional downward laminar airflow, which may be especially critical in joint arthroplasty operating rooms. This concern is based on theoretical mechanisms, laboratory simulations, retrospective case series, and studies showing potentially pathogenic organisms growing in the hoses and filters of forced air warming devices 6-12. However, multiple other studies 13-15 and a Continuing Education statement by the Association of perioperative Registered Nurses (AORN)16 suggest that proper use of the forced air warming devices mitigates or eliminates this risk while maximizing the benefits of patient warming. The pur- pose of the present manuscript is to review the current literature on the use of patient warming devices in orthopaedic surgery, specifically in joint arthroplasty.
    The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 12/2014; 96(200):e1-7. · 4.31 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The study was conducted to identify preoperative factors affecting the intraoperative core body temperature in abdominal surgery under general anesthesia.
    Clinical nurse specialist CNS 09/2014; 28(5):268-276. · 0.74 Impact Factor
  • Source
    The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 12/2014; 96(24):e200. · 4.31 Impact Factor


Available from
Oct 1, 2014