Monitoring patients at risk of massive transfusion with Thrombelastography or Thromboelastometry: a systematic review

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica (Impact Factor: 2.31). 11/2011; 55(10):1174-89. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02534.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Thrombelastography (TEG) and Thrombelastometry (ROTEM) are viscoelastic whole-blood assays evaluating the haemostatic capacity of blood. These devices are used in algorithms to guide transfusion of haemostatic blood components.
The methods used for this study were systematic reviews with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of TEG/ROTEM-based algorithm compared with standard treatment in patients with bleeding. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. We searched the literature in seven databases (up to 31 October 2010), reference lists, registers of ongoing trials, and contacted authors and experts. We extracted data from included studies related to study methods, interventions, outcomes, bias risk and adverse events using Cochrane methodology. All trials irrespective of blinding or language status were included.
Nine trials involving 776 participants were included. Eight trials involved cardiac surgery with an average blood loss of 390-960  ml, and one trial investigated liver transplantations. One trial was classified as low-risk-of-bias trial. We found two ongoing trials. No impact was identified on mortality, amount of blood transfused, incidence of surgical reinterventions, time to extubation, or length of stay in hospital and intensive care unit. We identified a significant reduction in blood loss favouring the use of TEG/ROTEM {85  ml [95% confidence interval (CI) 29.4-140.7]} and in the proportion of patients receiving freshly frozen plasma and platelets [relative risk 0.39 (95%CI 0.27-0.57)].
There is currently weak evidence to support the use of TEG/ROTEM as a tool to guide transfusion in patients with severe bleeding. Further studies need to address other clinical settings and with larger blood losses.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Impaired haemostasis represents a major risk factor for bleeding complications in neurosurgical patients. Coagulopathy commonly occurs after (brain) trauma and major haemorrhage or originates from antithrombotic medication. Point of care (POC) devices for bedside assessment of haemostatic parameters are increasingly used in various medical specialties. Results can be instantly implemented into treatment modalities as results are delivered within a very short period. POC coagulation testing has also shown beneficial effects in the treatment of neurosurgical patients. Identification of hyperfibrinolysis is achieved through viscoelastic testing of haemostasis and bedside coagulometry hastens the management of anticoagulated patients in need of urgent neurosurgical procedures. Results of POC testing of platelet function have been correlated with patient outcomes after traumatic brain injury and furthermore, quantification of antiplatelet medication effects on platelet activity is made possible through the use of these devices. Further studies are needed to characterise the potential of POC testing of platelet function. Antiplatelet medication plays an important role in regard to haemorrhagic and thromboembolic risks. Therefore, POC testing of platelet activity may improve treatment modalities in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures as well as neurointerventional procedures (such as intracranial stent placement). In this article we summarise the available data of POC testing in neurosurgical patients and discuss the potential of these devices in this field. POC technologies have improved patient care in various medical fields and in our view it is likely that this will also apply to the field of neurosurgery.
    Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 11/2014; 22(2). DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2014.07.029 · 1.32 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In physiological hemostasis a prompt recruitment of platelets on the vessel damage prevents the bleeding by the rapid formation of a platelet plug. Qualitative and/or quantitative platelet defects promote bleeding, whereas the high residual reactivity of platelets in patients on antiplatelet therapies moves forward thromboembolic complications. The biochemical mechanisms of the different phases of platelet activation - adhesion, shape change, release reaction, and aggregation - have been well delineated, whereas their complete translation into laboratory assays has not been so fulfilled. Laboratory tests of platelet function, such as bleeding time, light transmission platelet aggregation, lumiaggregometry, impedance aggregometry on whole blood, and platelet activation investigated by flow cytometry, are traditionally utilized for diagnosing hemostatic disorders and managing patients with platelet and hemostatic defects, but their use is still limited to specialized laboratories. To date, a point-of-care testing (POCT) dedicated to platelet function, using pertinent devices much simpler to use, has now become available (ie, PFA-100, VerifyNow System, Multiplate Electrode Aggregometry [MEA]). POCT includes new methodologies which may be used in critical clinical settings and also in general laboratories because they are rapid and easy to use, employing whole blood without the necessity of sample processing. Actually, these different platelet methodologies for the evaluation of inherited and acquired bleeding disorders and/or for monitoring antiplatelet therapies are spreading and the study of platelet function is strengthening. In this review, well-tried and innovative platelet function tests and their methodological features and clinical applications are considered.
    Vascular Health and Risk Management 02/2015; 11:133. DOI:10.2147/VHRM.S44469
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction Thrombelastography (TEG) is a method to assess clot formation and destruction. Various applications have been suggested in the literature. Objective To provide an overview of the current knowledge about TEG applications. Methods A database search in PubMed was performed up to July 2012 using the term “Thrombelastography [MeSH Terms]”. We analysed retrospective and prospective studies, reviews and guidelines with information about the applications of TEG written in English and Spanish. Results The search resulted in 3139 papers since 1962. These were classified in 8 categories: 862 (27.6%) in non-surgical diseases, 294 (9.4%) in liver transplant, 711 (22.6%) in basic research, 174 (5.5%) in obstetrics, 228 (7.3%) in cardiovascular surgery, 177 (5.6%) in other types of surgery, 234 (7.4%) in anaesthetic techniques, and 459 (14.6%) in relation with medications. Conclusion The application of TEG as a diagnostic tool and as a guide in transfusion therapy is increasing. Its use is still in development in different clinical fields and the advantages and limitations of this technique still have to be defined. It is evident that thrombelastography should be used with caution, and its strengths and weaknesses as well as new applications must continue to be explored.
    Revista Colombiana de Anestesiologia 10/2014; 42(4). DOI:10.1016/j.rca.2014.05.007