Article

Cognitive Functioning Predicts Driver Safety on Road Tests 1 and 2 Years Later

Division of Neuroergonomics, Department of Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (Impact Factor: 4.22). 10/2011; 60(1):99-105. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03739.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To describe longitudinal changes in mean level and evaluate rank-order stability in potential predictors of driving safety (visual sensory, motor, visual attention, and cognitive functioning) and safety errors during an 18-mile on-road driving test in older adults and to evaluate the relative predictive power of earlier visual sensory, motor, visual attention, and cognitive functioning on future safety errors, controlling for earlier driving capacity.
Three-year longitudinal observational study.
Large teaching hospital in the Midwest.
One hundred eleven neurologically normal older adults (60-89 at baseline).
Safety errors based on video review of a standard 18-mile on-road driving test served as the outcome measure. A comprehensive battery of tests on the predictor side included visual sensory functioning, motor functioning, cognitive functioning, and a measure of useful field of view.
Longitudinal changes in mean levels of safety errors and cognitive functioning were small from year to year. Relative rank-order stability between consecutive assessments was moderate in overall safety errors and moderate to strong in visual attention and cognitive functioning. Although prospective bivariate correlations between safety errors and predictors ranged from fair to moderate, only functioning in the cognitive domain predicted future driver performance 1 and 2 years later in multivariate analyses.
Normative aging-related declines in driver performance as assessed using on-road tests emerge slowly. Even in the presence of conservative controls, such as previous driving ability, age, and visual sensory and motor functioning, cognitive functioning predicted future on-road driving performance 1 and 2 years later.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Amy M.J. O'Shea, Dec 30, 2013
0 Followers
 · 
122 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective. Visual information is often used to guide purposeful movement. However, older adults have impaired responses to visual information, leading to increased risk for injuries and potential loss of independence. We evaluated distinct visual and motor attention contributions to a cued saccade task to determine the extent to which aging selectively affects these processes. Methods. Nineteen healthy young (18–28 years) and 20 older (60–90 years) participants performed a cued saccade task under two conditions. We challenged motor attention by changing the number of possible saccade targets (1 or 6). Results. Older adults had difficulty in inhibiting unwanted eye movements and had greater eye movement inaccuracy in the hard condition when compared to the younger adults and to the easy condition. Also, an inverse relation existed between performance on the visual and motor components of the task in older adults, unlike younger adults. Conclusions. Older adults demonstrated difficulty in both inhibiting irrelevant saccade targets and selecting correct saccade endpoints during more complex tasks.The shift in relations among attention measures between the younger and older participantsmay indicate a need to prioritize attentional resources with age. These changes may impact an older adult’s ability to function in complex environments.
    Journal of Ophthalmology 05/2014; 2014:860493. DOI:10.1155/2014/860493 · 1.94 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As people age, physical and psychological functions deteriorate which is associated with higher crash risk. In different countries traffic authorities developed screening systems to identify unsafe older drivers. However, until today these screening systems (medical check, road test, cognitive screening) failed. In this context, driving simulators could be helpful in measuring driving performance under controllable and replicable experimental conditions in near-crash situations. However, little is known about the relation between older drivers’ performance in an on-road test, cognitive screening and driving simulator performance. In this paper we examined the relation between these three driving related measures in a sample of older participants (mean age = 72.12 yrs.). The results show that performance in an on-road test and the performance in the cognitive tests explained 50% of the variance in the driving simulator performance (r = .71). The current analysis indicates that driving simulator data represents on-road driving behaviour and cognitive performance of older drivers. This research presents a substantial potential for driving simulators, for example identifying or retraining unsafe older drivers.
    Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 01/2014; 22:232–244. DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2013.12.007 · 1.99 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Current guidelines underline the limitations of existing instruments to assess fitness to drive and the poor adaptability of batteries of neuropsychological tests in primary care settings. Aims To provide a free, reliable, transparent computer based instrument capable of detecting effects of age or drugs on visual processing and cognitive functions. Methods Relying on systematic reviews of neuropsychological tests and driving performances, we conceived four new computed tasks measuring: visual processing (Task1), movement attention shift (Task2), executive response, alerting and orientation gain (Task3), and spatial memory (Task4). We then planned five studies to test MedDrive's reliability and validity. Study-1 defined instructions and learning functions collecting data from 105 senior drivers attending an automobile club course. Study-2 assessed concurrent validity for detecting minor cognitive impairment (MCI) against useful field of view (UFOV) on 120 new senior drivers. Study-3 collected data from 200 healthy drivers aged 20-90 to model age related normal cognitive decline. Study-4 measured MedDrive's reliability having 21 healthy volunteers repeat tests five times. Study-5 tested MedDrive's responsiveness to alcohol in a randomised, double-blinded, placebo, crossover, dose-response validation trial including 20 young healthy volunteers. Results Instructions were well understood and accepted by all senior drivers. Measures of visual processing (Task1) showed better performances than the UFOV in detecting MCI (ROC 0.770 vs. 0.620; p=0.048). MedDrive was capable of explaining 43.4% of changes occurring with natural cognitive decline. In young healthy drivers, learning effects became negligible from the third session onwards for all tasks except for dual tasking (ICC=0.769). All measures except alerting and orientation gain were affected by blood alcohol concentrations. Finally, MedDrive was able to explain 29.3% of potential causes of swerving on the driving simulator. Discussion and conclusions MedDrive reveals improved performances compared to existing computed neuropsychological tasks. It shows promising results both for clinical and research purposes.
    ICADTS 2013, Brisbane; 08/2013